Me too.
On 3/21/06, Juan F. Codagnone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so far, so good
>
> On Saturday 11 March 2006 03:00, dan tran wrote:
> > I am currently using 2.0.3 snapshot(s) in my production build.
> > So far all my builds work great
> >
> > +1 and looking forward to the release.
> >
> > -Dan
so far, so good
On Saturday 11 March 2006 03:00, dan tran wrote:
> I am currently using 2.0.3 snapshot(s) in my production build.
> So far all my builds work great
>
> +1 and looking forward to the release.
>
> -Dan
>
> On 3/10/06, Wayne Fay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well I did say "correct
Looks like we finally made it! The results for this third vote are as
follows:
Binding: 5 (John, Vincent, Carlos, Brett, Emmanuel)
Non-Binding: 7 (Fabrizio, Alex, Vincent S, Dan, Edwin, Brian, Jesse)
I'm going to start working on the release now. It should be out tomorrow
at the latest.
Than
great work John!
my +1
fabrizio
On 3/10/06, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It looks like the issue count for 2.0.3 is once again at zero (adjusting
> for those two tasks that are for the release process). So, let's do
> another vote
--
+1
Alex
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
Vincent
2006/3/10, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi again,
>
> I wanted to let everyone know that we've got the latest round of
> regressions fixed, including:
>
> * Fabrizio's lingering path problems from MNG-2006
> * MNG-2136
> * MNG-2124
> * MNG-2130
>
> These fixes also took care of s
+1
Emmanuel
John Casey a écrit :
Hi again,
I wanted to let everyone know that we've got the latest round of
regressions fixed, including:
* Fabrizio's lingering path problems from MNG-2006
* MNG-2136
* MNG-2124
* MNG-2130
These fixes also took care of some other outstanding issues, which h
I am currently using 2.0.3 snapshot(s) in my production build.
So far all my builds work great
+1 and looking forward to the release.
-Dan
On 3/10/06, Wayne Fay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well I did say "correct me if I'm wrong"... ;-)
>
> Thanks for the education, Brett.
>
> Wayne
>
>
> On
Well I did say "correct me if I'm wrong"... ;-)
Thanks for the education, Brett.
Wayne
On 3/10/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>
> Actually, it's just PMC members. They are the ones with the authority to
> make a release official.
>
> O
+1
John Casey wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I wanted to let everyone know that we've got the latest round of
> regressions fixed, including:
>
> * Fabrizio's lingering path problems from MNG-2006
> * MNG-2136
> * MNG-2124
> * MNG-2130
>
> These fixes also took care of some other outstanding issues, wh
http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
Actually, it's just PMC members. They are the ones with the authority to
make a release official.
Of course, we like to hear from everyone that has tested something to
confirm whether it is working or not.
- Brett
Wayne Fay wrote:
> Correct me if I'm
Correct me if I'm wrong... but I'm pretty certain non-binding votes
are when "people who aren't official Maven devs but happen to
subscribe to this list" (like me) feel like voting on dev issues. ;-)
Edwin, you're a "real Maven dev" so your votes on an issue are always "binding".
Wayne
On 3/10
+1
(what's non-binding?)
^_^
John Casey wrote:
Hi again,
I wanted to let everyone know that we've got the latest round of
regressions fixed, including:
* Fabrizio's lingering path problems from MNG-2006
* MNG-2136
* MNG-2124
* MNG-2130
These fixes also took care of some other outstandin
+1
On 3/10/06, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I wanted to let everyone know that we've got the latest round of
> regressions fixed, including:
>
> * Fabrizio's lingering path problems from MNG-2006
> * MNG-2136
> * MNG-2124
> * MNG-2130
>
> These fixes also took care of some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+1 (non-binding)
John Casey wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I wanted to let everyone know that we've got the latest round of
> regressions fixed, including:
>
> * Fabrizio's lingering path problems from MNG-2006
> * MNG-2136
> * MNG-2124
> * MNG-2130
>
> Th
+1
-Vincent
> -Original Message-
> From: John Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: vendredi 10 mars 2006 21:40
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: [vote] Release Maven 2.0.3 (third RC)
>
> Hi again,
>
> I wanted to let everyone know that we
+1 (non-binding) :)
On 3/10/06, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi again,
>
> I wanted to let everyone know that we've got the latest round of
> regressions fixed, including:
>
> * Fabrizio's lingering path problems from MNG-2006
> * MNG-2136
> * MNG-2124
> * MNG-2130
>
> These fixes als
Hi again,
I wanted to let everyone know that we've got the latest round of
regressions fixed, including:
* Fabrizio's lingering path problems from MNG-2006
* MNG-2136
* MNG-2124
* MNG-2130
These fixes also took care of some other outstanding issues, which have
also been closed:
* MNG-1882
DOH! Forgot about MNG-2127...guess the new RC will have to wait until
tomorrow, anyway.
Brett, do you have the ability to fix/test that soon, or should I try to
find a windows environment I can use?
Thanks,
John
Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
Still playing with this rc with multiproject builds w
this should be fixed in SVN. As soon as I've verified that MNG-2124 is
fixed as well (should be *very* shortly now), I'll put together a new RC
and call a new vote...unless anyone else has any objections? BTW, I've
moved MNG-1797 off of the 2.0.3 radar, since the general sentiment seems
to be t
This should go into JIRA as a blocker on 2.0.3 to make sure we keep
track of it properly.
There was another 2.0.1 -> 2.0.2 regression filed that I just put in as
a blocker. IT might be dismissed with investigation, but I'd like this
to be the release where all those are cleared up so I slotted it
error
>>> is very irritating. Carlos made this patch one month ago.
>>> Please apply it for 2.0.3.
>>>
>>> Greg
>>>
>>> - Original Message - From: "John Casey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: "Maven Developers Li
Still playing with this rc with multiproject builds with a flat
layout: after the DefaultModelInheritanceAssembler fix everything work
as expected but I got my website broken due to a different behaviour
during publishing.
In my root module the website root directory is /x/htdocs. With the
previou
John, please send a link to your latest build with MNG-1797 fixed when
available so I can test it and vote.
-Original Message-
From: John Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 4:16 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [vote] Release Maven 2.0.3 (second attempt
> > is very irritating. Carlos made this patch one month ago.
> > Please apply it for 2.0.3.
> >
> > Greg
> >
> > - Original Message - From: "John Casey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Maven Developers List"
> > Sent:
0.3.
Greg
- Original Message - From: "John Casey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Maven Developers List"
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 11:16 PM
Subject: Re: [vote] Release Maven 2.0.3 (second attempt)
This is the newest RC binary, including Kenney's fixes for MNG-1
y" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Maven Developers List"
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 11:16 PM
Subject: Re: [vote] Release Maven 2.0.3 (second attempt)
This is the newest RC binary, including Kenney's fixes for MNG-1317 and
MNG-1318, along with
> Hello everyone,
> > >
> > > If you've been tracking the thread calling for the release of Maven
> > > 2.0.3, you'll know that several issues came up which have delayed any
> > > decision on the release. The full discussion can be found here:
> &g
elayed any
> > decision on the release. The full discussion can be found here:
> >
> > http://www.nabble.com/-vote-Release-Maven-2.0.3-t1166489.html#a3063584
> >
> > At any rate, I wanted to report that the last issue I have the ability
> > to debug is fixed - MN
Hello everyone,
If you've been tracking the thread calling for the release of Maven
2.0.3, you'll know that several issues came up which have delayed any
decision on the release. The full discussion can be found here:
http://www.nabble.com/-vote-Release-Maven-2.0.3-t1166489.html#a
of Maven
2.0.3, you'll know that several issues came up which have delayed any
decision on the release. The full discussion can be found here:
http://www.nabble.com/-vote-Release-Maven-2.0.3-t1166489.html#a3063584
-
To unsub
; >
> >
> > On 3/2/06, Fabrizio Giustina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>big +1 this time
> >>
> >>fabrizio
> >>
> >>On 3/2/06, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hello everyone,
>
ycleExecutor.java:306)
> > at
> > org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeTaskSegments(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:273)
> >
> >
> >
> > On 3/2/06, Fabrizio Giustina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>big +1 this t
on on the release. The full discussion can be found here:
http://www.nabble.com/-vote-Release-Maven-2.0.3-t1166489.html#a3063584
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-
+1
-Original Message-
From: John Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 1:48 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [vote] Release Maven 2.0.3 (second attempt)
Hello everyone,
If you've been tracking the thread calling for the release of Maven
2.0.3, y
Jesse McConnell wrote:
+1
Alex
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
l discussion can be found here:
> >
> > http://www.nabble.com/-vote-Release-Maven-2.0.3-t1166489.html#a3063584
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 (tested)
Vincent
2006/3/2, Mike Perham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Are people testing this release candidate before voting +1? There have
> been previous point releases with major bugs that would have come to
> light before the release if people had actually tested the binary first
> and I hope ot
Are people testing this release candidate before voting +1? There have
been previous point releases with major bugs that would have come to
light before the release if people had actually tested the binary first
and I hope others aside from myself learned from that mistake. I plan
on holding off
ion can be found here:
>
> http://www.nabble.com/-vote-Release-Maven-2.0.3-t1166489.html#a3063584
>
> At any rate, I wanted to report that the last issue I have the ability
> to debug is fixed - MNG-1415. The only outstanding issue from the
> previous discussion is MNG-1317, which Kenne
he full discussion can be found here:
>
> http://www.nabble.com/-vote-Release-Maven-2.0.3-t1166489.html#a3063584
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
l know that several issues came up which have delayed any
> > decision on the release. The full discussion can be found here:
> >
> > http://www.nabble.com/-vote-Release-Maven-2.0.3-t1166489.html#a3063584
> >
> > At any rate, I wanted to report that the last issue I
+1
John Casey wrote:
Hello everyone,
If you've been tracking the thread calling for the release of Maven
2.0.3, you'll know that several issues came up which have delayed any
decision on the release. The full discussion can be found here:
http://www.nabble.com/-vote-Release-M
+1
Emmanuel
John Casey a écrit :
Hello everyone,
If you've been tracking the thread calling for the release of Maven
2.0.3, you'll know that several issues came up which have delayed any
decision on the release. The full discussion can be found here:
http://www.nabble.com/-vo
+1
John Casey wrote:
Hello everyone,
If you've been tracking the thread calling for the release of Maven
2.0.3, you'll know that several issues came up which have delayed any
decision on the release. The full discussion can be found here:
http://www.nabble.com/-vote-Release-M
Hello everyone,
If you've been tracking the thread calling for the release of Maven
2.0.3, you'll know that several issues came up which have delayed any
decision on the release. The full discussion can be found here:
http://www.nabble.com/-vote-Release-Maven-2.0.3-t1166489.html#a3
Update:
WAGONSSH-40 is fixed, and wagon-ssh-1.0-alpha-7 has been released. Also,
the pom.xml for Maven 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT is updated to use this new version.
Also, would it be possible for someone with Win2K to look at MNG-1317?
I'm going to be trying to knock out MNG-1415 next.
Thanks,
John
I'll try to test the patch on WinXP tomorrow for MNG-1317, but i'll can't test
it on windows 2000
Emmanuel
John Casey a écrit :
Binding: 9 (John, Jason, Vincent, Brett, Lukas, Emmanuel, Kenney,
Arnaud, Carlos)
Non-Binding: 6 (Brian, Fabrizio, Mike, Vincent S, Stephane, Allan)
HOWEVER, there
Binding: 9 (John, Jason, Vincent, Brett, Lukas, Emmanuel, Kenney,
Arnaud, Carlos)
Non-Binding: 6 (Brian, Fabrizio, Mike, Vincent S, Stephane, Allan)
HOWEVER, there has been quite a bit of talk about some issues that
should be included in this release. For that reason, I'm going to work
on them
List
Subject: Re: [vote] Release Maven 2.0.3
I've fixed this issue in SVN, and will test it more throughly using my Mac
tonight or tomorrow. If I can, I will release wagon-ssh-1.0-alpha-7 and modify
Maven to depend on this new version prior to the 2.0.3 release.
-john
Michael Böckling wrote:
ience with IT tests, perhaps
someone could convert them and add them?
Thanks,
Brian
-Original Message-
From: John Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 3:50 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [vote] Release Maven 2.0.3
I've fixed this issue in SVN
opers List
Subject: RE: Setting parameters doesn't work with 2.0.3 (was: [vote]
Release Maven 2.0.3)
Yes you're right. 1.1 is what I'm using internally. I was pretty sure
that 1.0 had the options. I'll make a test case.
-Original Message-
From: John Casey [mailto:[EMAI
ameters doesn't work with 2.0.3 (was: [vote]
Release Maven 2.0.3)
I just checked out:
https://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/tags/dependency-maven-plugin-1.0
and peeked at both:
CopyDependenciesMojo.java
AbstractFromDependenciesMojo.java
and neither one declares an excludeTransitive parameter.
sn't work with 2.0.3 (was: [vote]
Release Maven 2.0.3)
BTW, I should mention that I just verified that a mojo I wrote with a
parameter specified as:
/**
* @parameter expression="${drefresh.verbose}" default-value="false"
*/
works in a 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT built on Tuesday nig
List
Subject: Re: Setting parameters doesn't work with 2.0.3 (was: [vote]
Release Maven 2.0.3)
BTW, I should mention that I just verified that a mojo I wrote with a
parameter specified as:
/**
* @parameter expression="${drefresh.verbose}" default-value="false"
*/
arameters seem to get injected into
the mojo.
-Original Message-
From: Reinhard Poetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday,
February 24, 2006 6:52 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Setting parameters doesn't work with 2.0.3 (was: [vote]
Release Maven 2.0.3)
John Casey wrote
gt;
> -Original Message-
> From: Reinhard Poetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 6:52 AM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Setting parameters doesn't work with 2.0.3 (was: [vote]
> Release Maven 2.0.3)
>
> John Casey wrote:
>
>
hard Poetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 6:52 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Setting parameters doesn't work with 2.0.3 (was: [vote] Release Maven
2.0.3)
John Casey wrote:
If you're interested, you can take the current release candidate for a
test
the mojo.
-Original Message-
From: Reinhard Poetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 6:52 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Setting parameters doesn't work with 2.0.3 (was: [vote] Release Maven
2.0.3)
John Casey wrote:
If you're interested, you can t
riday, February 24, 2006 6:52 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Setting parameters doesn't work with 2.0.3 (was: [vote] Release Maven
2.0.3)
John Casey wrote:
> If you're interested, you can take the current release candidate for a
> test drive. The RC tar
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
We'll have to look into that, but you're using a very old eclipse
plugin, since the downloadSources is false by default.
-- Kenney
> John Casey wrote:
>
>
> > If you're interested, you can take the current release candidate for a
> > test drive. The RC
John Casey wrote:
If you're interested, you can take the current release candidate for a
test drive. The RC tarball is at:
http://maven.zones.apache.org/~maven/builds/branches/maven-2.0.x/m2-20060222.031501.tar.gz
As I had some problems with Maven 2.0.2 I tried to use this RC. Unfortunatly
I've fixed this issue in SVN, and will test it more throughly using my
Mac tonight or tomorrow. If I can, I will release wagon-ssh-1.0-alpha-7
and modify Maven to depend on this new version prior to the 2.0.3 release.
-john
Michael Böckling wrote:
I usually don't add my 2 cents to this, but I
sey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 10:07 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [vote] Release Maven 2.0.3
Hi,
I think it's time to release Maven 2.0.3. This release will incorporate
21 resolved JIRA issues, including some critical fixes for Continuum and
users of the em
+1 from me, but I also would like to see that WAGONSSH-36 fixed in this release
fabrizio
On 2/21/06, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think it's time to release Maven 2.0.3. This release will incorporate
> 21 resolved JIRA issues, including some critical fixes for Continuum and
riginal Message-
From: John Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 10:07 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [vote] Release Maven 2.0.3
Hi,
I think it's time to release Maven 2.0.3. This release will incorporate
21 resolved JIRA issues, including some critical fix
I can test it on windows XP,but actual mvn.bat works fine on it. I don't know
for Win2000
Emmanuel
John Casey a écrit :
I don't have a windows box on which to test #1, but I'll give #2 a run
and see what I can do.
-john
Kenney Westerhof wrote:
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Stephane Nicoll wrote:
+1
On 2/21/06, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think it's time to release Maven 2.0.3. This release will incorporate
> 21 resolved JIRA issues, including some critical fixes for Continuum and
> users of the embedder. The full listing of fixes can be found here:
>
> http://jira.co
I don't have a windows box on which to test #1, but I'll give #2 a run
and see what I can do.
-john
Kenney Westerhof wrote:
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Stephane Nicoll wrote:
+1,
with 2 comments:
1) no earth shaking fixes.. why not wait a bit longer?
2) it might be nice if 2.0.3 included these:
I usually don't add my 2 cents to this, but I do hope that maven-2.0.3
includes the fix for WAGONSSH-36 (not MNG, I know, but since it comes
bundled...). For CI, this is certainly a blocker!
Regards,
Michael
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Stephane Nicoll wrote:
+1,
with 2 comments:
1) no earth
+1
Vincent
2006/2/21, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> I think it's time to release Maven 2.0.3. This release will incorporate
> 21 resolved JIRA issues, including some critical fixes for Continuum and
> users of the embedder. The full listing of fixes can be found here:
>
> http://jira.
+1
Arnaud
On 2/22/06, Kenney Westerhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Stephane Nicoll wrote:
>
> +1,
>
> with 2 comments:
>
> 1) no earth shaking fixes.. why not wait a bit longer?
>
> 2) it might be nice if 2.0.3 included these:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1317
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Stephane Nicoll wrote:
+1,
with 2 comments:
1) no earth shaking fixes.. why not wait a bit longer?
2) it might be nice if 2.0.3 included these:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1317 (mvn.bat doesn't work on win2k/xp)
(and possibly this one:
http://jira.codehaus.org/bro
+1
On 2/22/06, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think it's time to release Maven 2.0.3. This release will incorporate
> 21 resolved JIRA issues, including some critical fixes for Continuum and
> users of the embedder. The full listing of fixes can be found here:
>
> http://jira.co
+ 1 for me
John Casey wrote:
Hi,
I think it's time to release Maven 2.0.3. This release will
incorporate 21 resolved JIRA issues, including some critical fixes for
Continuum and users of the embedder. The full listing of fixes can be
found here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote
+1.
Emmanuel
John Casey a écrit :
Hi,
I think it's time to release Maven 2.0.3. This release will incorporate
21 resolved JIRA issues, including some critical fixes for Continuum and
users of the embedder. The full listing of fixes can be found here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Release
+1
Lukas
John Casey wrote:
Hi,
I think it's time to release Maven 2.0.3. This release will incorporate
21 resolved JIRA issues, including some critical fixes for Continuum and
users of the embedder. The full listing of fixes can be found here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.j
+1, everything seems to be working for me.
John Casey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think it's time to release Maven 2.0.3. This release will incorporate
> 21 resolved JIRA issues, including some critical fixes for Continuum and
> users of the embedder. The full listing of fixes can be found here:
>
> http
+1
-Vincent
> -Original Message-
> From: John Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: mercredi 22 février 2006 05:07
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: [vote] Release Maven 2.0.3
>
> Hi,
>
> I think it's time to release Maven 2.0.3. This release wil
+1
John Casey wrote:
Hi,
I think it's time to release Maven 2.0.3. This release will incorporate
21 resolved JIRA issues, including some critical fixes for Continuum and
users of the embedder. The full listing of fixes can be found here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proj
Hi,
I think it's time to release Maven 2.0.3. This release will incorporate
21 resolved JIRA issues, including some critical fixes for Continuum and
users of the embedder. The full listing of fixes can be found here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&styleName=H
81 matches
Mail list logo
