On 25/05/2007, at 11:44 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
If you have specific objections about the code from your review of
it, please let's hear them.
[...]
I see you put these in JIRA too. Thanks.
If I fix something or add something on trunk now, I need to make
sure it still exists in the
On 23 May 07, at 7:02 PM 23 May 07, Brett Porter wrote:
If I fix something or add something on trunk now, I need to make
sure it still exists in the future code. That's the double work,
and it's a disincentive to do anything.
Just for sake of providing a sanity check. No one has commit
On 23 May 07, at 7:02 PM 23 May 07, Brett Porter wrote:
On 24/05/2007, at 2:53 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
I've only ever vetoed code I as working on that someone interfered
with and didn't ask. I've not ever vetoed against the majority on
project decisions. It's Raphael's decision really, an
>But this vote is about where the active development of the code will
>continue. And I have to disagree on Mojo, even if it is temporary.
I'll agree it's temporary in my mind.
>The Maven PMC has no oversight over the project, nor any authority.
>The code at mojo is not covered under any of Ap
On 24/05/2007, at 2:53 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
I've only ever vetoed code I as working on that someone interfered
with and didn't ask. I've not ever vetoed against the majority on
project decisions. It's Raphael's decision really, and my only
point is that people should accept when they un
Separating this discussion from the vote.
On 24/05/2007, at 2:53 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
I don't consider working on Archetype at Mojo unacceptable.
Raphaël is welcome to work on it there, of course.
But this vote is about where the active development of the code will
continue. And I have
7;re waiting for a patch to be applied, otherwise you risk
having patches that contain other unapplied patched code.
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 8:13 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [vote] Next steps for Archetype
Hi,
On 23 May 07, at 10:52 AM 23 May 07, Brett Porter wrote:
Ok, probably needs a little clarity - I'll try and keep it brief as
it is a vote.
Firstly, we're not diametrically opposed on when to make people
committers, as I've tried to point out elsewhere, though we do
disagree. But that's n
+1
I've tried to create 2 archetypes for netbeans based apps (placed at
mojo.codehaus.org svn) and it works like a charm as opposed to the
current archetype in trunk.
Milos
On 5/23/07, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
On 5/23/07, Mark Hobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Mark
Short answers inlined
Raphaël
2007/5/23, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Ok, probably needs a little clarity - I'll try and keep it brief as
it is a vote.
Firstly, we're not diametrically opposed on when to make people
committers, as I've tried to point out elsewhere, though we do
disagree.
Ok, probably needs a little clarity - I'll try and keep it brief as
it is a vote.
Firstly, we're not diametrically opposed on when to make people
committers, as I've tried to point out elsewhere, though we do
disagree. But that's not really the issue here, so I won't go into it
any furthe
On 23 May 07, at 8:28 AM 23 May 07, Raphaël Piéroni wrote:
+1 (But it don't really count :-))
You are the one that counts the most. I disagree with Brett about
moving this code over here right now because I don't think you're
ready, though I do see that you have the potential to be a goo
+1
On 5/23/07, Mark Hobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
Mark
On 23/05/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We need to figure out where we go next with Archetype. Raphaël has
> been doing a good job adding features and patiently listening to my
> feedback/nagging. It appears
+1
Mark
On 23/05/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
We need to figure out where we go next with Archetype. Raphaël has
been doing a good job adding features and patiently listening to my
feedback/nagging. It appears to me that it is very close to being as
good as what we had befor
+1 (But it don't really count :-))
Raphaël
2007/5/23, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
We need to figure out where we go next with Archetype. Raphaël has
been doing a good job adding features and patiently listening to my
feedback/nagging. It appears to me that it is very close to being
Hi,
We need to figure out where we go next with Archetype. Raphaël has
been doing a good job adding features and patiently listening to my
feedback/nagging. It appears to me that it is very close to being as
good as what we had before (though still a long list of things to do
before 1.0).
16 matches
Mail list logo
