>
> - How do other projects deal with emeritus committers? Is this
> conforming to
> apache-wide standards?
We had a discussion about that on jakarta-general (was a while ago), and the
general feeling is that
karma should only be removed if people stated that they want that to happen.
That doe
Kenney Westerhof wrote:
- these people should be send a direct e-mail notifying them so they
know what's going on. If they've been unactive in such a long
period it's higly likely that they don't follow the dev list anymore,
and should they want to participate again they'd be in for a big sur
Hi,
+1
I have some comments though:
- maybe the list could also be kept in svn or svn metadata somewhere
(perhaps explicitly listing them with no karma, such as @emeritus=ro in
svn config?) since web pages aren't really good for archiving
- these people should be send a direct e-mail notifyi
+1
-john
On 1/5/07, Vincent Siveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
Vincent
2007/1/4, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> Vote to operate as
> - requiring 2/3rds of the PMC to vote (13), with a majority within
> those votes for it to pass (ie, add them all and if the result is >
> 0).
+1
Vincent
2007/1/4, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
Vote to operate as
- requiring 2/3rds of the PMC to vote (13), with a majority within
those votes for it to pass (ie, add them all and if the result is >
0). Other votes would be welcome with reasons as advisory, but not
binding.
- Vot
+1
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
Vote to operate as
- requiring 2/3rds of the PMC to vote (13), with a majority within
those votes for it to pass (ie, add them all and if the result is >
0). Other votes would be welcome with reasons as advisory, but not
binding.
- Votes can be changed at any time
+1
On 1/4/07, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
>> - Alex Karasulu
Yep been a while. I should have let you guys know I could go emeritus
long before.
My apologies.
>> [X] +1, establish list of emeritus committers
Regards,
Alex
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
- Alex Karasulu
Yep been a while. I should have let you guys know I could go emeritus
long before.
My apologies.
[X] +1, establish list of emeritus committers
Regards,
Alex
-
To unsubscribe, e-mai
+1
On 1/4/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Vote to operate as
- requiring 2/3rds of the PMC to vote (13), with a majority within
those votes for it to pass (ie, add them all and if the result is >
0). Other votes would be welcome with reasons as advisory, but not
binding.
- Votes
+1
Rahul
- Original Message -
From: "Brett Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Maven Developers List"
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 7:58 PM
Subject: [vote] Establish a list of emeritus committers
Hi,
Vote to operate as
- requiring 2/3rds of the PMC to
+1
On 1/4/07, Mike Perham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
On 1/4/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Vote to operate as
> - requiring 2/3rds of the PMC to vote (13), with a majority within
> those votes for it to pass (ie, add them all and if the result is >
> 0). Other votes wo
+1
On 1/4/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Vote to operate as
- requiring 2/3rds of the PMC to vote (13), with a majority within
those votes for it to pass (ie, add them all and if the result is >
0). Other votes would be welcome with reasons as advisory, but not
binding.
- Votes
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
Vote to operate as
- requiring 2/3rds of the PMC to vote (13), with a majority within those
votes for it to pass (ie, add them all and if the result is > 0). Other
votes would be welcome with reasons as advisory, but not binding.
- Votes can be changed at any time befo
+1
- Joakim
Brett Porter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Vote to operate as
> - requiring 2/3rds of the PMC to vote (13), with a majority within
> those votes for it to pass (ie, add them all and if the result is >
> 0). Other votes would be welcome with reasons as advisory, but not
> binding.
> - Votes can be
+1
arnaud
On 1/4/07, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
Stéphane
On 1/4/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Vote to operate as
> - requiring 2/3rds of the PMC to vote (13), with a majority within
> those votes for it to pass (ie, add them all and if the result is
+1
Stéphane
On 1/4/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Vote to operate as
- requiring 2/3rds of the PMC to vote (13), with a majority within
those votes for it to pass (ie, add them all and if the result is >
0). Other votes would be welcome with reasons as advisory, but not
bindin
+1
fabrizio
On 1/4/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Vote to operate as
- requiring 2/3rds of the PMC to vote (13), with a majority within
those votes for it to pass (ie, add them all and if the result is >
0). Other votes would be welcome with reasons as advisory, but not
binding
+1
-Vincent
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: jeudi 4 janvier 2007 07:59
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: [vote] Establish a list of emeritus committers
>
> Hi,
>
> Vote to operate as
> - requiring 2/3rds o
+1
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
Hi,
Vote to operate as
- requiring 2/3rds of the PMC to vote (13), with a majority within those
votes for it to pass (ie, add them all and if the result is > 0). Other
votes would be welcome with reasons as advisory, but not binding.
- Votes can be changed
- An emeritus committer can request commit access again at any time
they feel they can be active, and a vote will be held to accept them
or not.
I'm not a Maven committer so this is a "peanut gallery" comment, but the
corresponding policy in other similar situations I've seen across Apache is
Hi,
Vote to operate as
- requiring 2/3rds of the PMC to vote (13), with a majority within
those votes for it to pass (ie, add them all and if the result is >
0). Other votes would be welcome with reasons as advisory, but not
binding.
- Votes can be changed at any time before result is post
21 matches
Mail list logo
