my very late vote :(, altough it's not needed
[X] +1 for the full proposal - collapse all groups (implies a vote for
the next option if vote doesn't pass)
On 1/23/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yah, I sent a follow up mail acknowledging this and to the effect of
"go nuts, but don't
Yah, I sent a follow up mail acknowledging this and to the effect of
"go nuts, but don't go crazy" :)
- Brett
On 24/01/2007, at 2:02 PM, Rahul Thakur wrote:
Is this formalized then?
Rahul
Brett Porter wrote:
After the allotted 72 hours, the results stand as:
Full proposal: 9 (7 PMC, 2 c
Is this formalized then?
Rahul
Brett Porter wrote:
After the allotted 72 hours, the results stand as:
Full proposal: 9 (7 PMC, 2 committers): Brett, Arnaud, Emmanuel,
Trygve, Dennis, Fabrizio, Lukas, Rahul, Milos
Partial proposal: 6 (6 PMC): Joakim, John T, Kenney, Jesse, John C, Jason
Abst
+0 for me (a bit late)
-Vincent
On 1/12/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After the allotted 72 hours, the results stand as:
Full proposal: 9 (7 PMC, 2 committers): Brett, Arnaud, Emmanuel,
Trygve, Dennis, Fabrizio, Lukas, Rahul, Milos
Partial proposal: 6 (6 PMC): Joakim, John T, Ken
After the allotted 72 hours, the results stand as:
Full proposal: 9 (7 PMC, 2 committers): Brett, Arnaud, Emmanuel,
Trygve, Dennis, Fabrizio, Lukas, Rahul, Milos
Partial proposal: 6 (6 PMC): Joakim, John T, Kenney, Jesse, John C,
Jason
Abstained: 3 (3 PMC): Mike, Vincent S, Stephane
Against:
On 8 Jan 07, at 7:04 PM 8 Jan 07, Jason van Zyl wrote:
-1
I change mine to:
[X ] +1 for the partial proposal - retain subproject access restrictions
I just want at the sub-project level.
On 8 Jan 07, at 6:50 PM 8 Jan 07, Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
Since there was no objection to calling
-0 it might be nice to have access to everything once you join, but
it seems handy to have an acl of all those writing to the various areas.
On 8 Jan 2007, at 23:50, Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
Since there was no objection to calling a vote, as discussed in the
proposal, I'd like to call a vot
[x] +1 for the full proposal - collapse all groups (implies a vote for
the next option if vote doesn't pass)
-Lukas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[X] +1 for the full proposal - collapse all groups (implies a vote for
the next option if vote doesn't pass)
I think that anybody that got a committer status in any of the maven
subproject should at least be considered enough smart to understand by
himself if he has enough knowledge and confidenc
+1 for the partial proposal, retaining subproject access restrictions.
On 1/10/07, Jesse McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[X] +1 for the partial proposal - retain subproject access restrictions
On 1/9/07, John Tolentino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Brett Porter wrote:
> > [ ] +1 for the
[X] +1 for the partial proposal - retain subproject access restrictions
On 1/9/07, John Tolentino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brett Porter wrote:
> [ ] +1 for the full proposal - collapse all groups (implies a vote for
> the next option if vote doesn't pass)
> [X] +1 for the partial proposal -
Brett Porter wrote:
[ ] +1 for the full proposal - collapse all groups (implies a vote for
the next option if vote doesn't pass)
[X] +1 for the partial proposal - retain subproject access restrictions
[ ] 0 abstain from vote
[ ] -1 do not alter the current permissions
---
Brett Porter wrote:
[X] +1 for the full proposal - collapse all groups (implies a vote for
the next option if vote doesn't pass)
[ ] +1 for the partial proposal - retain subproject access restrictions
[ ] 0 abstain from vote
[ ] -1 do not alter the current permissions
Cheers,
Brett
--
Denn
Brett Porter wrote:
[(re)moved parts of original mail:]
[ ] +1 for the full proposal - collapse all groups (implies a vote for
the next option if vote doesn't pass)
[X] +1 for the partial proposal - retain subproject access restrictions
[ ] 0 abstain from vote
[ ] -1 do not alter the current
[ ] +1 for the full proposal - collapse all groups (implies a vote for
the next option if vote doesn't pass)
[X] +1 for the partial proposal - retain subproject access restrictions
[ ] 0 abstain from vote
[ ] -1 do not alter the current permissions
+0
Stéphane
On 1/9/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Since there was no objection to calling a vote, as discussed in the
proposal, I'd like to call a vote on this.
To see the proposal and discussion: http://mail-archives.apache.org/
mod_mbox/maven-dev/200612.mbox/%3c67FC84B5-451
+0
Vincent
2007/1/8, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
Since there was no objection to calling a vote, as discussed in the
proposal, I'd like to call a vote on this.
To see the proposal and discussion: http://mail-archives.apache.org/
mod_mbox/maven-dev/200612.mbox/%3c67FC84B5-4510-469B-A
+1 on the collapsing of access groups
Milos
On 1/9/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Since there was no objection to calling a vote, as discussed in the
proposal, I'd like to call a vote on this.
To see the proposal and discussion: http://mail-archives.apache.org/
mod_mbox/maven
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
Since there was no objection to calling a vote, as discussed in the
proposal, I'd like to call a vote on this.
To see the proposal and discussion:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/200612.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vote to operate as
- requiring 2/3rd
+1 with same comment.
I don't think committers that don't know enough a project will commit on it
except for basic patches.
Emmanuel
Arnaud HERITIER a écrit :
[ X ] +1 for the full proposal - collapse all groups (implies a vote
for the next option if vote doesn't pass)
We are all enough adul
+1 for the full proposal - collapse all groups (implies a vote for the
next option if vote doesn't pass)
Rahul
Brett Porter wrote:
On 09/01/2007, at 10:50 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
[X] +1 for the full proposal - collapse all groups (implies a vote
for the next option if vote doesn't pass)
On 09/01/2007, at 10:50 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
[X] +1 for the full proposal - collapse all groups (implies a vote
for the next option if vote doesn't pass)
[ ] +1 for the partial proposal - retain subproject access
restrictions
[ ] 0 abstain from vote
[ ] -1 do not alter the current permis
[ X ] +1 for the full proposal - collapse all groups (implies a vote
for the next option if vote doesn't pass)
We are all enough adult to know what we can(not) do. And everything is
stored in an SCM thus we can remove any error introduced by someone else.
Arnaud
On 1/9/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL
-1
On 8 Jan 07, at 6:50 PM 8 Jan 07, Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
Since there was no objection to calling a vote, as discussed in the
proposal, I'd like to call a vote on this.
To see the proposal and discussion: http://mail-archives.apache.org/
mod_mbox/maven-dev/200612.mbox/%3c67FC84B5-4510-
Hi,
Since there was no objection to calling a vote, as discussed in the
proposal, I'd like to call a vote on this.
To see the proposal and discussion: http://mail-archives.apache.org/
mod_mbox/maven-dev/200612.mbox/%3c67FC84B5-4510-469B-AEC1-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vote to operate as
- requiri
25 matches
Mail list logo
