I think the idea is not to terminate it, but simply to move further
development to the trunk, and use the branch only for bug fixes (e.g.
2.0.6/7/8...) while the trunk will be used for the main development
(2.1 for instance).
On 5/21/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Brett Porter wr
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
I propose we focus on developing Maven 2.1 with both a mix of new
features and bug fixes.
If we identify the need for a 2.0.5, we should manually merge changes
there based on revisions from trunk, bearing in mind our new dev process.
Why would anyone terminate a bug f
On 14 May 06, at 11:55 AM 14 May 06, Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
I propose we focus on developing Maven 2.1 with both a mix of new
features and bug fixes.
If we identify the need for a 2.0.5, we should manually merge
changes there based on revisions from trunk, bearing in mind our
new dev p
Hi,
I propose we focus on developing Maven 2.1 with both a mix of new
features and bug fixes.
If we identify the need for a 2.0.5, we should manually merge changes
there based on revisions from trunk, bearing in mind our new dev process.
Thoughts?
- Brett
-
