-Original Message-
> > > From: Eric Pugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: lundi 15 août 2005 23:06
> > > To: Maven Developers List
> > > Subject: Re: [proposal] plugin oversight
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > I think that this
PROTECTED]
> > Sent: lundi 15 août 2005 23:06
> > To: Maven Developers List
> > Subject: Re: [proposal] plugin oversight
> >
> > +1
> >
> > I think that this is key. It is also a good way to distribute the
> > work, and incentivise people... As long
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Maven Developers List'"
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 9:11 AM
Subject: RE: [proposal] plugin oversight
-Original Message-
From: Eric Pugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: lundi 15 août 2005 23:06
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [
I totally agree
+1
Arnaud
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : dimanche 14 août 2005 22:18
> À : Maven Developers List
> Objet : [mojo-dev] [proposal] plugin oversight
>
> Ah, unloved plugins. We've known for a
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Pugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: lundi 15 août 2005 23:06
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: [proposal] plugin oversight
>
> +1
>
> I think that this is key. It is also a good way to distribute the
> work,
+1
I think that this is key. It is also a good way to distribute the
work, and incentivise people... As long as some people don't end up
with the garbage can! I think it's better to say "these plugins need
adoption" then just to assign them all to one person.
Eric
On Aug 14, 2005, at
Ah, unloved plugins. We've known for a while that this is a problem in
Maven. Sometimes they remain stable, sometimes not but either way nobody
is looking at them. I just got prodded to review the ejb plugin (which
I've never worked on) and saw that of the 10 outstanding issues 6 were
dupes or won'
