Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3

I've been testing the Wagon Webdav module in the current release candidate - there are a few glitches to do with the graceful handling of redirects. See WAGON-103 for more details. I recommend that we should retract this from core for the 2.0.9 release. James On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 11:48 +0100,

Re: CLI Properties vs. Model Properties (Was Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3)

ent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 1:16 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: CLI Properties vs. Model Properties (Was Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3) Sorry for the spam. Digging deeper through the related links on MNG-2339, it's apparent that the comment in the DefaultMavenProjectBuilder i

RE: CLI Properties vs. Model Properties (Was Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3)

edict Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 3:38 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: CLI Properties vs. Model Properties (Was Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3) Brian, what do you consider the correct fix? That CLI takes precedence over POM properties? I was trying to glean through this chain to fin

Re: CLI Properties vs. Model Properties (Was Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3)

On 28/03/2008, at 6:37 AM, Paul Benedict wrote: Brian, what do you consider the correct fix? That CLI takes precedence over POM properties? I was trying to glean through this chain to find out your proposal. The "most correct" fix is: a) -Dversion should still replace ${version} b) -Dvers

Re: CLI Properties vs. Model Properties (Was Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3)

Brian, what do you consider the correct fix? That CLI takes precedence over POM properties? I was trying to glean through this chain to find out your proposal. Paul On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >I can't see why overriding model values makes any sen

RE: CLI Properties vs. Model Properties (Was Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3)

>I can't see why overriding model values makes any sense from the >command line - that's not what Olivier wanted but rather a straight >substitution. You shouldn't be able to override model values for sure. I was saying that if something is defined on the CLI for everything else, it should ta

RE: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3

Hi Dan, we saw that last night, try the RC4-SNAPSHOT: http://people.apache.org/~brianf -Original Message- From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 2:54 PM To: dev@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3 I'm seeing a regression i

Re: CLI Properties vs. Model Properties (Was Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3)

should start deprecating the non ${project. Forms of the properties with big warnings in 2.0.9. -Original Message- From: John Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 1:16 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: CLI Properties vs. Model Properties (Was Re: [

Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3

to catch LinkageError > > * [MNG-3395] - Default core plugin versions in the superpom. > > * [MNG-3442] - Add explicit resource bundle for English > > * [MNG-3461] - Mirrors should not apply to file:// repositories > > * [MNG-3467] - PatternSet needs a toSt

Re: CLI Properties vs. Model Properties (Was Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3)

, March 27, 2008 1:16 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: CLI Properties vs. Model Properties (Was Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3) Sorry for the spam. Digging deeper through the related links on MNG-2339, it's apparent that the comment in the DefaultMavenProjectBuilder is a touch misl

RE: CLI Properties vs. Model Properties (Was Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3)

, 2008 1:16 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: CLI Properties vs. Model Properties (Was Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3) Sorry for the spam. Digging deeper through the related links on MNG-2339, it's apparent that the comment in the DefaultMavenProjectBuilder is a touch misleading. Th

RE: CLI Properties vs. Model Properties (Was Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3)

as Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3) BTW, I found this comment on line 981 of DefaultMavenProjectBuilder: // [MNG-2339] ensure the system properties are still interpolated for backwards compat, but the model values must win I've checked that issue, and it looks like it was close

Re: CLI Properties vs. Model Properties (Was Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3)

different property, but we should understand why this changed before going further. John, any ideas? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Olivier Lamy Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 6:56 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [pre vot

CLI Properties vs. Model Properties (Was Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3)

PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Olivier Lamy Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 6:56 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3 Hi, Testing on corporate projects and build fine. +1 I have just noticed a change ("regression" ?). We have a corpora

Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3

CTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Olivier Lamy Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 6:56 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3 Hi, Testing on corporate projects and build fine. +1 I have just noticed a change ("regression" ?). We have a cor

RE: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3

Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3 Hi, Testing on corporate projects and build fine. +1 I have just noticed a change ("regression" ?). We have a corporate plugin. In the pom it's configured as this : ..

Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3

Hi, Testing on corporate projects and build fine. +1 I have just noticed a change ("regression" ?). We have a corporate plugin. In the pom it's configured as this : .. .. - ${version} .. We use it with mvn blabla -Dversion=here a version.

Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3

Tested on my projects, works fine. Here's my +1 for RC4. -- Fabrice - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 4:26 AM, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sejal, James, could you try with this informal RC? > http://people.apache.org/~brianf/2.0.9/

Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3

I've built mevenide with it and it worked fine. +1 Milos On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Jorg Heymans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > same here, no apparent issues with RC4 on my projects. > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 9:27 AM, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Tested w

Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3

same here, no apparent issues with RC4 on my projects. On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 9:27 AM, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > Tested with my local projects with no issue. > > 2008/3/26, Raphaël Piéroni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > +1 the bundle worked fine to build > > the archetype

Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3

+1 Tested with my local projects with no issue. 2008/3/26, Raphaël Piéroni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > +1 the bundle worked fine to build > the archetype plugin. > > Raphaël > > 2008/3/26, Raphaël Piéroni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > +1 for the new process. > > not yet tested the bundle. > > > > Rap

RE: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3

: Brian E. Fox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 11:07 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: RE: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3 It is, we'll respin RC4 in the morning. IMO, 3119 should be permanently reverted (in 2.0.x) for the reasons I put in the jira. -Ori

RE: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3

nd it's a simple fix in the poms if that causes a problem. I'm > worried about stuff like James found (MNG-3119). > > -Original Message- > From: Sejal Patel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 9:56 PM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject

Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3

simple fix in the poms if that causes a problem. I'm > worried about stuff like James found (MNG-3119). > > -Original Message- > From: Sejal Patel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 9:56 PM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: Re: [pre vote t

RE: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3

Original Message- From: Sejal Patel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 9:56 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3 Thanks but it won't be as great a test as you might think though since I long ago locked down the plugin version numb

Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3

; -Original Message- > From: Sejal Patel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 6:47 PM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3 > > +1 for now. Seems to work with my personal projects at home. I'll see how > well it

RE: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3

ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 6:47 PM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3 > > +1 for now. Seems to work with my personal projects at home. I'll see how > well it works on our projects at work and make sure it do

RE: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3

Sejal, thanks...that's exactly the kind of tests we'll need. -Original Message- From: Sejal Patel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 6:47 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3 +1 for now. Seems to work with my personal p

Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3

+1 for now. Seems to work with my personal projects at home. I'll see how well it works on our projects at work and make sure it doesn't break anything that used to work with 2.0.8. I'll give my final answer probably in a little over 24 hours from now (want to make sure it works with all of our pr

Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3

+1 the bundle worked fine to build the archetype plugin. Raphaël 2008/3/26, Raphaël Piéroni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > +1 for the new process. > not yet tested the bundle. > > Raphaël > > 2008/3/26, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > We fixed the regressions identified last week with the plug

Re: [pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3

+1 for the new process. not yet tested the bundle. Raphaël 2008/3/26, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > We fixed the regressions identified last week with the plugin tools and > reporting impl. The new 2.0.9 is staged at > > > > http://people.apache.org/~brianf/staging-repository/org/apache/m

[pre vote take 3] 2.0.9-RC3

We fixed the regressions identified last week with the plugin tools and reporting impl. The new 2.0.9 is staged at http://people.apache.org/~brianf/staging-repository/org/apache/maven/apa che-maven/2.0.9-RC3/ You'll notice that this one has an RC qualifier attached to it. Since what I've a