John Fallows wrote:
If processContents was set to "skip", the would validate,
but that seems very lenient.
It seems the only valid setting as we have to retain backwards compat so
can't change the format. Thanks!
- Brett
--
Brett,
> Take a peek at:
> http://maven.apache.org/maven-v3_0_0.xsd (Maven 1.1, can be used for
> 1.0.2 as well)
> http://maven.apache.org/maven-v4_0_0.xsd (Maven 2.0)
Looks good. :-)
> And if you can tell me why properties in the first don't validate
> properly for the case, that'd be great :
John,
Take a peek at:
http://maven.apache.org/maven-v3_0_0.xsd (Maven 1.1, can be used for
1.0.2 as well)
http://maven.apache.org/maven-v4_0_0.xsd (Maven 2.0)
And if you can tell me why properties in the first don't validate
properly for the case, that'd be great :)
Cheers,
Brett
John Fa
What are the current design goals for the M2 pom xsd?
The existing schema definition for Maven 1.x
http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-project-3.0.0.xsd
has no namespace and uses sequence for child elements.
Will Maven2 instance documents be required to specify a namespace in production?
http:
