Raised the following so this doesn't get lost:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1648
Mark
On 05/11/05, Tomislav Bodor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've attached a partial canonical paths patch. I don't know who this
> should really be going to if it's to find its way into the tree, but
Hi,
I've attached a partial canonical paths patch. I don't know who this
should really be going to if it's to find its way into the tree, but I
reckon someone here will know.
This doesn't quite fix the problem you are talking about in this thread,
but it does fix a similar one that I have
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Mark Hobson wrote:
> Hi Kenney,
>
> On 04/11/05, Kenney Westerhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I didn't realize the exact difference. I think I added the 'canonical'
> > versions, and the 'absolute' versions were implicit. They should
> > ofcourse be the same.
> >
> > Is this
Hi Kenney,
On 04/11/05, Kenney Westerhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I didn't realize the exact difference. I think I added the 'canonical'
> versions, and the 'absolute' versions were implicit. They should
> ofcourse be the same.
>
> Is this correct:
>
>
> /path/a/b/
>
> /path/c
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Mark Hobson wrote:
Hi,
> Hi there,
>
> The svn trunk eclipse plugin tests are failing for me under cygwin.
> The problem is that some parts of the project/classpath/setting
> writers are using absolute paths, and in others they're using
> canonical paths.
>
> The abstract test
Hi there,
The svn trunk eclipse plugin tests are failing for me under cygwin.
The problem is that some parts of the project/classpath/setting
writers are using absolute paths, and in others they're using
canonical paths.
The abstract test always replaces ${basedir} with either the basedir
system
