Re: [m2] Transitive dependency clash resolving

2005-06-13 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 08:48 +0200, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > Let's say that I have a dependency on project A and project B, and that > both have a dependency on project LOG. > > So I declare a dependency on those in my POM, and the transitive > dependency mechanism will get me also LOG... but wh

Re: [m2] Transitive dependency clash resolving

2005-06-13 Thread Brett Porter
Jörg Schaible wrote: IMHO there should be a distinction between direct and transitive dependencies in the POM. I should be able to *suggest* the version of the transitive dependencies to use, but not have it included in the cleaapath if no direct dependency references it. Nicola, you can u

RE: [m2] Transitive dependency clash resolving

2005-06-13 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Nicola, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote on Monday, June 13, 2005 8:49 AM: > Let's say that I have a dependency on project A and project > B, and that both have a dependency on project LOG. > > So I declare a dependency on those in my POM, and the > transitive dependency mechanism will get me also LO

[m2] Transitive dependency clash resolving

2005-06-13 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Let's say that I have a dependency on project A and project B, and that both have a dependency on project LOG. So I declare a dependency on those in my POM, and the transitive dependency mechanism will get me also LOG... but which version? If I want to specify the version I want, I can add LOG a