Hi Jason,
Not much work has been done yet. I have created a really minimal version
of the plugin. Thats 7 lines of real code. Have a look at the plugin if
you want to, its attached to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1659 . It may not be the
best way of doing it, but doubt there
Geoffrey De Smet wrote:
Resources could use a lot more then the current filtering:
- build timestamp
Most of these are supported and they actually use a reflection tool to
provide a light version of Velocity essentially.
- pom information:
-- version
-- name, description, organization, ...
Resources could use a lot more then the current filtering:
- build timestamp
- pom information:
-- version
-- name, description, organization, ...
-- url
- svn revision
So all these things can be shown in the application and logs
The current resources filtering happens something like this now:
s
Piéroni Raphaël wrote:
Do the archetype plugin have a Velocity feature ?
Archetype uses Velocity for creating project templates. But that
actually needs to be fixed in some places as running GIFs through
Velocity usually doesn't work very well :-)
Jason.
-
Brett Porter wrote:
I'm not so sure about this. Do we really want to be swizzling resources?
I don't know what anyone might want to do, that's why I would use Velocity.
This is the first suggestion of what users might want to do.
So far what I've seen has been fairly limited needs - fields i
Do the archetype plugin have a Velocity feature ?
2006/3/2, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I'm not so sure about this. Do we really want to be swizzling resources?
>
> So far what I've seen has been fairly limited needs - fields in the
> manifest and a properties file of info for record kee
I'm not so sure about this. Do we really want to be swizzling resources?
So far what I've seen has been fairly limited needs - fields in the
manifest and a properties file of info for record keeping. I think a
specialised plugin (maybe even a velocity plugin) is better for this
than introducing ve
Anders Hessellund Jensen wrote:
I would like to be able to substitute timestamps with the build time
into a resource file. As I understand it, there is currently no plugin
to to this, so I consider writing one.
Sorry for not responding to this earlier, and I know that you've started
working o
The plugin is in progress. I'm aiming for functionality identical to
that of the TStamp Ant core task:
http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTasks/tstamp.html .
Anders Hessellund Jensen wrote:
I would like to be able to substitute timestamps with the build time
into a resource file. As I understand
I could certainly put this to use..
-Original Message-
From: Anders Hessellund Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 10:30 AM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: [m2] Timestamp plugin
I would like to be able to substitute timestamps with the build time
into a
This seems like a very useful plugin to have. I think we should have one.
Cheers
Prasad
On 2/28/06, Anders Hessellund Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to be able to substitute timestamps with the build time
> into a resource file. As I understand it, there is currently no plugin
>
I would like to be able to substitute timestamps with the build time
into a resource file. As I understand it, there is currently no plugin
to to this, so I consider writing one.
The plugin should leverage the existing resource filtering mechanism of
M2. The plugin would take a configuration l
12 matches
Mail list logo
