Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
Looks ok to me, though I don't know why we shouldn't just drop the
ant:cvs part altogether and use scm:checkout as you have in the
otherwise blocks. What do you think?
I tried that but could not get cvs to work in a way that
Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
Looks ok to me, though I don't know why we shouldn't just drop the
ant:cvs part altogether and use scm:checkout as you have in the
otherwise blocks. What do you think?
I tried that but could not get cvs to work in a way that
Phil Steitz wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
Looks ok to me, though I don't know why we shouldn't just drop the
ant:cvs part altogether and use scm:checkout as you have in the
otherwise blocks. What do you think?
I tried that but could not get cvs to work in a way that would preserve
backward c
Brett Porter wrote:
Looks ok to me, though I don't know why we shouldn't just drop the
ant:cvs part altogether and use scm:checkout as you have in the
otherwise blocks. What do you think?
Emmanuel, do you have any thoughts? I'm not overly familiar with the plugin.
+1. scm:checkout works fine
Brett Porter wrote:
Looks ok to me, though I don't know why we shouldn't just drop the
ant:cvs part altogether and use scm:checkout as you have in the
otherwise blocks. What do you think?
I tried that but could not get cvs to work in a way that would preserve
backward compatibility. I will pla
Looks ok to me, though I don't know why we shouldn't just drop the
ant:cvs part altogether and use scm:checkout as you have in the
otherwise blocks. What do you think?
Emmanuel, do you have any thoughts? I'm not overly familiar with the plugin.
- Brett
Phil Steitz wrote:
> Last week I added a p
Last week I added a patch to MPJDIFF-6 here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPJDIFF-6?page=all
Comments?
Phil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
