Re: [discuss] iBatis, JPA and Java 5.0

2007-01-23 Thread Jesse McConnell
well, I believe a lot of the 'less then robust' stem from a couple of things we ran into last summer doing some related work. (at least for me, others may vary) I know joakim talked to erik some about the issues we ran into with plexus-security at the time (now plexus-redback). For those issues

Re: [discuss] iBatis, JPA and Java 5.0

2007-01-23 Thread Andy Jefferson
>> JDO is not bad, but JPOX has proven to be less then robust. > Sometime ago I joined this list to provide an easier a communication channel > for solving continuum/jpox issues and besides a few emails no one has ever > requested any help on issues neither gave any feedback. > JPOX is the only

Re: [discuss] iBatis, JPA and Java 5.0

2007-01-09 Thread Trygve Laugstøl
Carlos Sanchez wrote: On 1/2/07, Rahul Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: - Original Message - From: "Brett Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 4:59 PM Subject: Re: [discuss] iBatis, JPA and Java 5.0 > I've been thinking stay

Re: [discuss] iBatis, JPA and Java 5.0

2007-01-03 Thread Brett Porter
On 03/01/2007, at 4:29 PM, Rahul Thakur wrote: I am not sure what you refer to by: [snip] The way Continuum is designed means you get to a certain point where you want to save an object and you find that you can't, or you aren't saving everything you want, etc. [/snip] Could you please gi

Re: [discuss] iBatis, JPA and Java 5.0

2007-01-03 Thread Rahul Thakur
Hi Erik, I am playing around refactoring some store stuff using jdo and ibatis on a separate branch (key-refactoring) and welcome any help i can get with JDO :-). I am usually on #continuum on IRC (irc.codehaus.org), or happy to join jpox lists. Cheers, Rahul Erik Bengtson wrote: Quoting

Re: [discuss] iBatis, JPA and Java 5.0

2007-01-03 Thread Jesse McConnell
its not just jpox in continuum but also the jpox usage in the plexus-security rbac and user management stores that joakim worked through a couple of months back while consulting with you I think. Joakim can explain more on that if he likes. I just remember that we had a mess of issues in getting

Re: [discuss] iBatis, JPA and Java 5.0

2007-01-03 Thread Erik Bengtson
Quoting Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > JDO is not bad, but JPOX has proven to be less then robust. Sometime ago I joined this list to provide an easier a communication channel for solving continuum/jpox issues and besides a few emails no one has ever requested any help on issues neither gav

Re: [discuss] iBatis, JPA and Java 5.0

2007-01-02 Thread Brett Porter
I've been thinking stay with JDO for now, look at JPA in the long term. I haven't used iBatis, and would be happy to hear some practical experience from people who have. I tend to think of it as "a more productive JDBC", as opposed to the different programming model of JDO/Hibernate/JPA.

[discuss] iBatis, JPA and Java 5.0

2007-01-02 Thread Rahul Thakur
These buzzwords have been making rounds on IRC and dev list :-), and after slight digging around I found a reference to a similar discussion here: http://www.mail-archive.com/ibatis-user-java@incubator.apache.org/msg01251.html Agreed that the store implementation for Continuum should be plugg