Re: [discuss] Graduate Continuum to its own TLP

2008-01-28 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
ok. On Jan 28, 2008 2:44 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yep, that's the type of proposal. It might be better to look for one > from Jakarta since that's closer to Continuum's scenario. And the > description I refer to is entered into the 1st and 3rd paragraph > (though the descript

Re: [discuss] Graduate Continuum to its own TLP

2008-01-28 Thread Brett Porter
Yep, that's the type of proposal. It might be better to look for one from Jakarta since that's closer to Continuum's scenario. And the description I refer to is entered into the 1st and 3rd paragraph (though the description can be more than that if desired). It's really the "mission stateme

Re: [discuss] Graduate Continuum to its own TLP

2008-01-28 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
Brett, What do you mean with "proposed project description, and the proposal" ? I thought to send only a proposal like this one: http://www.opensubscriber.com/message/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/6461007.html Do you think to something else? If it's only that, I think I'll send it this week, maybe the next.

Re: [discuss] Graduate Continuum to its own TLP

2008-01-07 Thread Brett Porter
of course :) On 07/01/2008, at 5:09 PM, Rahul Thakur wrote: Are more than one nominations allowed per person? Rahul Brett Porter wrote: So the poll for progressing seems in favour. Before we continue to vote on a proposal to send to the board, we need to decide on a description for the p

Re: [discuss] Graduate Continuum to its own TLP

2007-12-22 Thread Jesse McConnell
+1 I still think this is a great idea... On Dec 22, 2007 6:34 AM, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm ok too, but I don't have the time to work on it. > > Emmanuel > > Olivier Lamy a écrit : > > Hi, > > Agree to start processing this. > > > > If I can help I will. > > > > -- > > Oli

Re: [discuss] Graduate Continuum to its own TLP

2007-12-21 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, Agree to start processing this. If I can help I will. -- Olivier 2007/12/20, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > So, what's next? > > This seems generally in favour - now might be a good time to get > started on it? > > From past experience the steps would be: > - poll the current maven com

Re: [discuss] Graduate Continuum to its own TLP

2007-10-01 Thread Mauro Talevi
Jesse McConnell wrote: I actually would prefer to have an increased focus on maven and maven2 integration. tbh there are many different continuous integration servers and the ties with maven could be increased some more and leverage some really nice features in maven. I don't really think conti