Re: Maven-plugins WAS: [Vote] Arnaud Heritier as a committer

2004-04-20 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
> Yes, it was the entire change of the plugin I wasn't kosher with as it changed entirely the css and markup and broke the theme work Bob did. I definitely want to maintain what Bob originally had because it is the first plugin I intend to swap out partially for the pure java version, the first pha

RE: Maven-plugins WAS: [Vote] Arnaud Heritier as a committer

2004-04-19 Thread Vincent Massol
t I think we must not force plugins out. Thanks -Vincent > -Original Message- > From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 20 April 2004 06:15 > To: 'Maven Developers List' > Subject: RE: Maven-plugins WAS: [Vote] Arnaud Heritier as a committer >

RE: Maven-plugins WAS: [Vote] Arnaud Heritier as a committer

2004-04-19 Thread Brett Porter
> Not Fabrizio's doing at all, I'm just asking that you be > careful in what you apply because the xdoc plugin is going to > be one of the first bridges between component land, and with > it maintainability, and the maven1 plugins. Yep, will do. > Who cares if it's spectacular or not, if Arnau

RE: Maven-plugins WAS: [Vote] Arnaud Heritier as a committer

2004-04-19 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 23:54, Brett Porter wrote: > > Yes, it was the entire change of the plugin I wasn't kosher > > with as it changed entirely the css and markup and broke the > > theme work Bob did. I definitely want to maintain what Bob > > originally had because it is the first plugin I int

RE: Maven-plugins WAS: [Vote] Arnaud Heritier as a committer

2004-04-19 Thread Brett Porter
> Yes, it was the entire change of the plugin I wasn't kosher > with as it changed entirely the css and markup and broke the > theme work Bob did. I definitely want to maintain what Bob > originally had because it is the first plugin I intend to > swap out partially for the pure java version, t

RE: Maven-plugins WAS: [Vote] Arnaud Heritier as a committer

2004-04-19 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 23:35, Brett Porter wrote: > > And the approach building a set of developers for the > > plugins? If it's akin to what has happened with Arnaud that > > would be an excellent thing. A track record of producing good > > quality patches and recognized by someone else trying t

RE: Maven-plugins WAS: [Vote] Arnaud Heritier as a committer

2004-04-19 Thread Brett Porter
> And the approach building a set of developers for the > plugins? If it's akin to what has happened with Arnaud that > would be an excellent thing. A track record of producing good > quality patches and recognized by someone else trying to take > care of that plugin. I think Vincent also menti

Re: Maven-plugins WAS: [Vote] Arnaud Heritier as a committer

2004-04-19 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 19:00, Brett Porter wrote: > There's a few discussions here, so on each point: > > Arnaud: +1 to Arnaud (welcome!) > HOWEVER: my understanding is that 3 x +1 is not enough to jump in - aren't > we required to wait 24 hours so those on the other side of the planet have a > cha

Maven-plugins WAS: [Vote] Arnaud Heritier as a committer

2004-04-19 Thread Brett Porter
ly helpful. - I don't remember, I think there was something, but its early :) Cheers, Brett > -Original Message- > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, 20 April 2004 8:28 AM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: RE: [Vote] Arnaud Heritier

RE: [Vote] Arnaud Heritier as a committer

2004-04-19 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 18:18, Fabrizio Giustina wrote: > > There's nothign stopping you from putting your own stuff in any > web-enabled location and pointing any build you want at that location. > > I know, and I already do that... but you still need to ask people to add your new > repository loc

RE: [Vote] Arnaud Heritier as a committer

2004-04-19 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: lunedì 19 aprile 2004 23.19 To: Maven Developers List Subject: RE: [Vote] Arnaud Heritier as a committer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Vote] Arnaud Heritier as a committer

2004-04-19 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 16:38, Fabrizio Giustina wrote: > Yes, please... start thinking about opening the doors for new committers on > maven-plugins or on specific plugins only. > I agree that cvs access should not be given away for free, but the list of plugins > is too long to have so few people

RE: [Vote] Arnaud Heritier as a committer

2004-04-19 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
PROTECTED] Sent: lunedì 19 aprile 2004 18.10 To: 'Maven Developers List' Subject: RE: [Vote] Arnaud Heritier as a committer +1 from me too for both the distinction and for Arnaud as a committer on the maven-plugins. Thanks -Vincent ---

RE: [Vote] Arnaud Heritier as a committer

2004-04-19 Thread Heritier Arnaud
: RE: [Vote] Arnaud Heritier as a committer On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 12:50, Heritier Arnaud wrote: > Hello guys, > > Thanks a lot Emmanuel to suggest doing me a committer. > I'm totally aggree that you should do the distinction between the two modules. > In any case, I won't

RE: [Vote] Arnaud Heritier as a committer

2004-04-19 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 12:50, Heritier Arnaud wrote: > Hello guys, > > Thanks a lot Emmanuel to suggest doing me a committer. > I'm totally aggree that you should do the distinction between the two modules. > In any case, I won't take the liberty to modify the maven core. You certainly can, but t

RE: [Vote] Arnaud Heritier as a committer

2004-04-19 Thread Jason van Zyl
-- > > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 19 April 2004 17:56 > > To: Maven Developers List > > Subject: Re: [Vote] Arnaud Heritier as a committer > > > > On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 11:47, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: > > > > > > > >

RE: [Vote] Arnaud Heritier as a committer

2004-04-19 Thread Heritier Arnaud
ssarily a good editor and vice versa. Thanks a lot for your respect. Arnaud. -Message d'origine- De : Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : lundi 19 avril 2004 18:10 À : 'Maven Developers List' Objet : RE: [Vote] Arnaud Heritier as a committer +1 from me too

RE: [Vote] Arnaud Heritier as a committer

2004-04-19 Thread Vincent Massol
+1 from me too for both the distinction and for Arnaud as a committer on the maven-plugins. Thanks -Vincent > -Original Message- > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 19 April 2004 17:56 > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: Re: [Vote] Arnaud Heritier

Re: [Vote] Arnaud Heritier as a committer

2004-04-19 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 11:47, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: > > > > I would like to start making a distinction here. A committer for > > maven-plugins is fine, but not for the core. > > I'm +1 too for a distinction. > > > > > If this distinction is fine, which we can control with the cvs avail > > file

Re: [Vote] Arnaud Heritier as a committer

2004-04-19 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
- Original Message - From: "Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Maven Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 4:20 PM Subject: Re: [Vote] Arnaud Heritier as a committer > On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 10:00, Emmanuel Venisse w

Re: [Vote] Arnaud Heritier as a committer

2004-04-19 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 10:00, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: > Howdy, > > As part of maven fixes and evolution, I'd like to add Arnaud as a committer. > Since few month, he submit a lot of patchs for fix bugs and it's him that > rewrite the PDF plugin. > > Moreover, it often takes part on the mailing lis

[Vote] Arnaud Heritier as a committer

2004-04-19 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
Howdy, As part of maven fixes and evolution, I'd like to add Arnaud as a committer. Since few month, he submit a lot of patchs for fix bugs and it's him that rewrite the PDF plugin. Moreover, it often takes part on the mailing list to help the other users. My +1. Emmanuel