Re: [VOTE 3] maven-assembly-plugin 2.2-beta-4

2009-06-01 Thread David Jencks
On Jun 1, 2009, at 1:47 PM, Paul Gier wrote: When the source plugin forks the lifecycle it causes all the phases up to "generate-sources" to be run again. So if your assembly plugin is bound to any phase before that it will be run twice. Once in the main lifecycle and once in the forked

Re: [VOTE 3] maven-assembly-plugin 2.2-beta-4

2009-06-01 Thread Paul Gier
When the source plugin forks the lifecycle it causes all the phases up to "generate-sources" to be run again. So if your assembly plugin is bound to any phase before that it will be run twice. Once in the main lifecycle and once in the forked lifecycle. Since your assembly goal is bound to th

Re: [VOTE 3] maven-assembly-plugin 2.2-beta-4

2009-06-01 Thread David Jencks
I guess my description wasn't quite precise enough to get people to look at the snippet. The snippet I showed has this bit twice: [INFO] [assembly:single {execution: default}] [INFO] Building tar : /Users/david/geronimo/svn/geronimo/genesis/ trunk/target/genesis-2.0-SNAPSHOT-source-release.t

[VOTE 3] maven-assembly-plugin 2.2-beta-4

2009-06-01 Thread John Casey
Hi again, I've corrected the missing NOTICE and LICENSE files, and [hopefully] the POM signature issue (by using Maven 2.0.10 for the release...2.2.0 isn't released yet, so I don't want to inject further risk of bugs). Please let me know if I've missed anything else. URLs below have been upd

Re: [VOTE 3] maven-assembly-plugin 2.2-beta-4

2009-06-01 Thread Paul Gier
A new goal "jar-no-fork" was added to the source plugin in MSOURCES-13. If you update to version 2.1 of the source plugin and change the goal "jar" to "jar-no-fork" that might work better for you. David Jencks wrote: I thought it was working great but... what could cause this? [INFO] -

[CANCELED] [VOTE 3] maven-assembly-plugin 2.2-beta-4

2009-06-01 Thread John Casey
Ben, you're right...that was a stupid move on my part, forgetting about a bug that I spent quite a lot of time fixing! :-) I'll also correct that one-off source-release assembly for the assembly plugin itself, and reissue the release for a new vote. -john Benjamin Bentmann wrote: John Casey

Re: [VOTE 3] maven-assembly-plugin 2.2-beta-4

2009-06-01 Thread John Casey
If you're talking about the [source:jar] bit, then that's another plugin (maven-sources-plugin, IIRC) that may need to be turned off...though that does produce a different type of artifact than the project source structure we're attempting to put together for source releases. -john David Jenc

Re: [VOTE 3] maven-assembly-plugin 2.2-beta-4

2009-05-30 Thread David Jencks
I thought it was working great but... what could cause this? [INFO] [INFO] Building Genesis [INFO]task-segment: [clean, install] [INFO] [INF

Re: [VOTE 3] maven-assembly-plugin 2.2-beta-4

2009-05-30 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
John Casey wrote: I've corrected the regressions from previous VOTEs for this plugin, and I'm ready to try this once again.. Thanks for all your efforts on this plugin and the various upstream projects to bring us an easy source bundling tool. I kinda feel bad to say the following... http

Re: [VOTE 3] maven-assembly-plugin 2.2-beta-4

2009-05-30 Thread Deng Ching
+1, I tried it with Archiva and I didn't see any problems in the generated tar and zip bundles. The links in the nav menu seems broken.. I'm not sure if the new staged site just hasn't been synched yet or if it is really broken. Thanks, Deng On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 4:41 AM, John Casey wrote: >

[VOTE 3] maven-assembly-plugin 2.2-beta-4

2009-05-29 Thread John Casey
Hi again, I've corrected the regressions from previous VOTEs for this plugin, and I'm ready to try this once again...the URLs below have been updated where appropriate. Also note that I've staged the site documentation, and included a link to that as well. --- As I'm sure you've noticed, we'v