>
> I don't have time until early June, but would be happy to help you if
> you need by then.
Same thing for me.
We could think about this in June.
>
> > > Jerome
Arnaud
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For add
On Thu, 2004-05-13 at 00:50, Arnaud Heritier wrote:
>
> > I think you're reaching an interesting point here.
> >
> > The developer information should be retrieved from an external
> > repository, this being an LDAP or a simple global XML file shared by all
> > projects.
> >
> > Otherwise yo
> I think you're reaching an interesting point here.
>
> The developer information should be retrieved from an external
> repository, this being an LDAP or a simple global XML file shared by all
> projects.
>
> Otherwise you have a maintenance burdain on big projects.
>
> Furthermore, it i
Arnaud wrote:
> Yes. But we use the same declaration for a developer (or contributor) in
> several project.xml.
> Actually a developer is defined by a name, an email, ...
> Someone asked some month ago to have a messengerId.
> We can think that it all this data could be retrieved from a single
> r
> > I'm agree with you but the result is that all maven-plugins commiters
> are
> > developers for all plugins :-(
>
> Nope. They are potential plugin "developers" that's all.
Yes, potentially.
> >
> > Yes. I think that we can have developers with a commiter role but also
> > developers without
> -Original Message-
> From: Arnaud Heritier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 May 2004 22:39
> To: 'Maven Developers List'
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Remove developers from plugins project.xml
>
>
>
> > -Message d'origine-
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : mardi 11 mai 2004 18:02
> À : 'Maven Developers List'
> Objet : RE: [VOTE] Remove developers from plugins project.xml
>
...
>
> For me, developers are the persons
On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 11:26, Heritier Arnaud wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to propose that we remove the developers declaration in the pom
> for each plugin and that we use only the one in the plugin-parent.
>
> Why
>
> Because :
> - It will simplify the mainten
> -Original Message-
> From: Heritier Arnaud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 May 2004 17:45
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Remove developers from plugins project.xml
>
> ok for this.
> But in this case we must use roles to define this.
; which should be contacted
> when any changes to plugin are going to be added. It's clear that each
> plugin has different developers.
>
> Michal
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Heritier Arnaud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tue
I'm -1 because more and more plugins will be considered as standalone
projects with their own lifecycle.
Thanks
-Vincent
> -Original Message-
> From: Heritier Arnaud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 May 2004 17:27
> To: Maven Dev (E-mail)
> Subject: [VOTE] Re
rent developers.
Michal
> -Original Message-
> From: Heritier Arnaud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 5:27 PM
> To: Maven Dev (E-mail)
> Subject: [VOTE] Remove developers from plugins project.xml
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I would
Hi all,
I would like to propose that we remove the developers declaration in the pom
for each plugin and that we use only the one in the plugin-parent.
Why
Because :
- It will simplify the maintenance. There are approximatively 80 plugins and
20 or 30 comit
13 matches
Mail list logo
