Re: [VOTE] Release maven-plugin-tools 2.1 (take 2)

2007-03-16 Thread Daniel Kulp
+1 Dan On Saturday 10 March 2007 18:25, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > Hi, > > Trying this vote once more. This time with staging. > > This release is a preparation for a new release of the > maven-plugin-plugin. > > Changes: > - Add support for new annotations: @since for mojos and > @implementation

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-plugin-tools 2.1 (take 2)

2007-03-16 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Well, you voted the first time around, but that vote failed. So a new vote had to be called for. Stephane Nicoll wrote: I did vote already for this one right? (I don't remember actually and I can't find that back in my mails). In any case +1 Stéphane On 3/15/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-plugin-tools 2.1 (take 2)

2007-03-16 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Here are the results of this vote: +1 (3 + 1 non-binding): Dennis Lundberg, Brett Porter, Stephane Nicoll and Jerome Lacoste (non-binding). I will proceed with the release. Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi, Trying this vote once more. This time with staging. This release is a preparation for a ne

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-plugin-tools 2.1 (take 2)

2007-03-16 Thread Stephane Nicoll
I did vote already for this one right? (I don't remember actually and I can't find that back in my mails). In any case +1 Stéphane On 3/15/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I need one more vote... -- Dennis Lundberg Dennis Lundberg wrote: > Hi, > > Trying this vote once more. T

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-plugin-tools 2.1 (take 2)

2007-03-15 Thread Dennis Lundberg
I need one more vote... -- Dennis Lundberg Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi, Trying this vote once more. This time with staging. This release is a preparation for a new release of the maven-plugin-plugin. Changes: - Add support for new annotations: @since for mojos and @implementation for paramete

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-plugin-tools 2.1 (take 2)

2007-03-12 Thread Brett Porter
+1 On 10/03/2007, at 3:25 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi, Trying this vote once more. This time with staging. This release is a preparation for a new release of the maven-plugin- plugin. Changes: - Add support for new annotations: @since for mojos and @implementation for parameters - Rem

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-plugin-tools 2.1 (take 2)

2007-03-11 Thread Jerome Lacoste
On 3/11/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Trying this vote once more. This time with staging. This release is a preparation for a new release of the maven-plugin-plugin. Changes: - Add support for new annotations: @since for mojos and @implementation for parameters - Remove p

[VOTE] Release maven-plugin-tools 2.1 (take 2)

2007-03-10 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi, Trying this vote once more. This time with staging. This release is a preparation for a new release of the maven-plugin-plugin. Changes: - Add support for new annotations: @since for mojos and @implementation for parameters - Remove pluggy. It was only for the bootstrap and is no longer nee

[RESULT][VOTE] Release maven-plugin-tools 2.1

2007-03-10 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Here are the results of this vote: +1 (1): Dennis Lundberg -1 (2): Daniel Kulp, Brett Porter This vote has failed. Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi, I'd like to release maven-plugin-tools-2.1. The previous release was 2.0.5. This release is a preparation for a new release of the maven-plugin-plugi

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-plugin-tools 2.1

2007-03-04 Thread Brett Porter
-1 Agreeing with Daniel - AFAICT the POMs are not correctly configured to generate the proper license files, etc. on release. If you could update the parents and either stage a release or deploy snapshots with the release profile turned on, then I'm +1. Thanks! - Brett On 04/03/2007, at

Re: making releases was: [VOTE] Release maven-plugin-tools 2.1

2007-03-04 Thread Brett Porter
On 04/03/2007, at 6:41 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: Can you point to some specific Apache rule that says so? There have been discussions on this topic before, but I have yet to see someone point me to the source for this rule. I don't disagree with the sentiment of this, I just want to know

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-plugin-tools 2.1

2007-03-04 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 4 Mar 07, at 6:41 AM 4 Mar 07, Dennis Lundberg wrote: Daniel Kulp wrote: +1 However, by apache rules we should be voting on staged artifacts, not snapshots. The snapshots don't meet apache release requirements so technically, any vote on them should be an immediate -1. Plus, things

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-plugin-tools 2.1

2007-03-04 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Daniel Kulp wrote: +1 However, by apache rules we should be voting on staged artifacts, not snapshots. The snapshots don't meet apache release requirements so technically, any vote on them should be an immediate -1. Plus, things like the gpg signatures and stuff are not available to verify

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-plugin-tools 2.1

2007-03-04 Thread Daniel Kulp
+1 However, by apache rules we should be voting on staged artifacts, not snapshots. The snapshots don't meet apache release requirements so technically, any vote on them should be an immediate -1. Plus, things like the gpg signatures and stuff are not available to verify and such. For Jaso

[VOTE] Release maven-plugin-tools 2.1

2007-03-04 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi, I'd like to release maven-plugin-tools-2.1. The previous release was 2.0.5. This release is a preparation for a new release of the maven-plugin-plugin. I could not find any project in JIRA where issues for this component would be, but the differences that can be found between the last rele