Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result :
+1 (binding): Benjamin Bentmann, Dennis Lundberg, Olivier Lamy
+1 (non binding): Tony Chemit
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This time I'm building with Maven 2.0.10, so the signatures should
Le Sun, 06 Dec 2009 22:17:24 +0100,
Dennis Lundberg a écrit :
+1
> Hi,
>
> This time I'm building with Maven 2.0.10, so the signatures should be
> OK. I did not re-stage the site, since there were no changes to it.
>
>
> This vote comes soon after the 2.2 release, but I'd like to get a quick
+1
2009/12/8 Benjamin Bentmann :
> Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>
>> Staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-042/
>>
>> Staging site:
>> http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-changes-plugin-2.3/
>
> +1
>
>
> Benjamin
>
> -
+1
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This time I'm building with Maven 2.0.10, so the signatures should be
> OK. I did not re-stage the site, since there were no changes to it.
>
>
> This vote comes soon after the 2.2 release, but I'd like to get a quick
> release out to fix http://jira.codehaus
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-042/
Staging site:
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-changes-plugin-2.3/
+1
Benjamin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr.
Hi,
This time I'm building with Maven 2.0.10, so the signatures should be
OK. I did not re-stage the site, since there were no changes to it.
This vote comes soon after the 2.2 release, but I'd like to get a quick
release out to fix http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHANGES-186 which is
a regress
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>
>> This vote comes soon after the 2.2 release
>
> No need to apologize ;-)
>
>> Staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-036/
>
> The .pom.asc seems not to match the plugin POM [0]. Looking at the POM,
> it see
2.2.1 is recommended in the release guide now (mostly because the wagon upgrade
is necessary to work with scp).
I think we should solve the concern about building with JDK 1.4 a different way
(toolchains, and/or animal sniffer).
Cheers,
Brett
On 05/12/2009, at 7:13 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> > Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> >
> >> This vote comes soon after the 2.2 release
> >
> > No need to apologize ;-)
> >
> >> Staging repo:
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-036/
> >
> > The .
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>
>> This vote comes soon after the 2.2 release
>
> No need to apologize ;-)
>
>> Staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-036/
>
> The .pom.asc seems not to match the plugin POM [0]. Looking at the POM,
> it see
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
This vote comes soon after the 2.2 release
No need to apologize ;-)
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-036/
The .pom.asc seems not to match the plugin POM [0]. Looking at the POM,
it seems as if it was deployed using Maven 2.1.0 a
Hi,
This vote comes soon after the 2.2 release, but I'd like to get a quick
release out to fix http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHANGES-186 which is
a regression from the 2.1 version.
We solved 7 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11212&version=15999
There are st
12 matches
Mail list logo
