Vote passes with +1's from Karl, Olivier, and me.
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> +1
>
> On 17 September 2014 06:27, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
> > So, this vote is still open, and I'd be grateful for more voters.
> >
> > I originally forgot my own +1.
> >
> >
> > On Sun,
+1
On 17 September 2014 06:27, Benson Margulies wrote:
> So, this vote is still open, and I'd be grateful for more voters.
>
> I originally forgot my own +1.
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Robert,
>>
>> > SCM is a Git project and I think we will be pu
So, this vote is still open, and I'd be grateful for more voters.
I originally forgot my own +1.
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise
wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> > SCM is a Git project and I think we will be punished
> > if we remove tags
>
>> there.
>>
>
> So we should prevent to
Hi Robert,
> SCM is a Git project and I think we will be punished
> if we remove tags
there.
So we should prevent to be bad guys ;-)...
Search for Maven-3.2.0 ...
Hm...Ok...
So we just let the tag in the history without having a real release
existing neither in Central etc.
Ki
SCM is a Git project and I think we will be punished if we remove tags
there.
Search for Maven-3.2.0 ...
Op Sun, 14 Sep 2014 19:15:32 +0200 schreef Karl Heinz Marbaise
:
Hi,
> Hi Benson,
I would suggest to send an offical makes it cleared and better to follow
on the list...
[CANCLE] [
Hi,
> Hi Benson,
I would suggest to send an offical makes it cleared and better to follow
on the list...
[CANCLE] [VOTE] message...
And yes i would delete the 1.9.2 tag from SVN...
The above is my opinion.
Do we have documented this kind of behaviour somewhere i couldn't
remember that
Hi Benson,
I would suggest to send an offical makes it cleared and better to follow
on the list...
[CANCLE] [VOTE] message...
And yes i would delete the 1.9.2 tag from SVN...
Kind regards
Karl-Heinz Marbaise
On 9/14/14 5:50 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Ben
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>
>> I would like to pull back this vote, unless someone objects. On the one
>> hand, the problem with the release plugin and git is already addressed in
>> 1.9.1. On the o
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> I would like to pull back this vote, unless someone objects. On the one
> hand, the problem with the release plugin and git is already addressed in
> 1.9.1. On the other hand, there are some lingering pull requests, some of
> which look
I would like to pull back this vote, unless someone objects. On the one
hand, the problem with the release plugin and git is already addressed in
1.9.1. On the other hand, there are some lingering pull requests, some of
which look reasonable, so it seems unkind to release without them. I'll
wait un
Hi Benson,
>
We solved 4 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=20535&styleName=Text&projectId=10527&Create=Create&atl_token=ACIO-CAVI-QX7G-9IAS%7C6ec69413b98c8f7154244ebb8f5f495082468378%7Clin
Also listed below.
There are still a couple of issues left in
JIRA:http:/
Hi,
We solved 4 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=20535&styleName=Text&projectId=10527&Create=Create&atl_token=ACIO-CAVI-QX7G-9IAS%7C6ec69413b98c8f7154244ebb8f5f495082468378%7Clin
Also listed below.
There are still a couple of issues left in
JIRA:http://jira.co
12 matches
Mail list logo
