Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 : Mark Raynsford, Robert Scholte, Hervé BOUTEMY, Olivier Lamy
PMC quorum: reached
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
On Sun, 03 Dec 2017 22:50:42 +0100, Robert Scholte
wrote:
Hi,
We solved 27 issues:
https://issues.ap
+1
On 4 December 2017 at 08:50, Robert Scholte wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 27 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
> ctId=12317529&version=12330875&styleName=Text
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=pr
+1
tried to reproduce the build and check the result with diffoscope: just found
know little files dates noise
Regards,
Hervé
Le dimanche 3 décembre 2017, 22:50:42 CET Robert Scholte a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> We solved 27 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12
+1
On Sun, 03 Dec 2017 22:50:42 +0100, Robert Scholte
wrote:
Hi,
We solved 27 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317529&version=12330875&styleName=Text
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=proje
On 2017-12-03T22:50:42 +0100
"Robert Scholte" wrote:
>
> We solved 27 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317529&version=12330875&styleName=Text
>
+1 (non-binding)
Pretty heavily tested on multiple projects. Both the javadoc and
aggregation goals have be
Hi,
We solved 27 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317529&version=12330875&styleName=Text
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%2012317529%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20key%2
I'm going to cancel this vote.
The modules + aggregators is a valid find and it is quite easy to fix.
I'd prefer to add it for 3.0.0, otherwise others will hit it too.
Robert
On Sat, 18 Nov 2017 16:10:34 +0100, Robert Scholte
wrote:
Hi,
We solved 27 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira
that works because OpenJDK uses module-source-path, i.e.
src//<*.java>
Maven uses source-path because it matches exactly one module , i.e.
src/main/java/<*.java>
Aggregator for modules requires to make use of module-source-paths.
I guess we need to consider to make use of symbolic links :(
t
On 2017-11-18T17:44:23 +0100
Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> JDK javadoc seems to cover the "aggregated javadocs" scenario: in Java 9
> terms, that's "multi-modules" = exactly the case for JDK 9 javadoc [1]
> I don't know what's the command line to produce this, but looks feasible from
> javadoc side
>
JDK javadoc seems to cover the "aggregated javadocs" scenario: in Java 9
terms, that's "multi-modules" = exactly the case for JDK 9 javadoc [1]
I don't know what's the command line to produce this, but looks feasible from
javadoc side
Regards,
Hervé
[1] https://docs.oracle.com/javase/9/docs/ap
Le samedi 18 novembre 2017, 17:18:06 CET Mark Raynsford a écrit :
> On 2017-11-18T16:14:04 +
>
> Mark Raynsford wrote:
> > Presumably, with the module-info.java files
> > excluded, it reverts back to plain classpath style JavaDoc.
>
> Actually, it results in sort of weird looking JavaDoc tha
On 2017-11-18T16:14:04 +
Mark Raynsford wrote:
> Presumably, with the module-info.java files
> excluded, it reverts back to plain classpath style JavaDoc.
Actually, it results in sort of weird looking JavaDoc that only
contains a single module, and claims that all packages are in
that module:
On 2017-11-18T17:04:12 +0100
"Robert Scholte" wrote:
> That's similar to MJAVADOC-479[1]
>
> Seems like all Java 9 issues are not resolved yet.
> I don't mind canceling the vote if we can fix this as well.
>
> thanks,
> Robert
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-479
Yeah, t
That's similar to MJAVADOC-479[1]
Seems like all Java 9 issues are not resolved yet.
I don't mind canceling the vote if we can fix this as well.
thanks,
Robert
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-479
On Sat, 18 Nov 2017 16:57:36 +0100, Mark Raynsford
wrote:
Hello!
I'd lik
Hello!
I'd like to vote on this issue, but I still have a remaining problem
and am not sure if it's because the plugin is broken due to the new
module changes, or just because my project setup is slightly
unusual.
See here:
https://github.com/io7m/maven-javadoc-bug-20171118
The "c" module attem
Hi,
We solved 27 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317529&version=12330875&styleName=Text
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%2012317529%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20key%2
Issue found related to a Maven multimodule projects and Java 9 module
descriptors.
This needs to be fixed for 3.0.0.
thanks,
Robert
On Fri, 17 Nov 2017 18:37:16 +0100, Robert Scholte
wrote:
Hi,
We solved 26 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=123175
Hi Mark,
thanks for testing. I can confirm the problem.
I'll cancel the vote and roll out another release based on your patch.
thanks,
Robert
On Sat, 18 Nov 2017 12:46:51 +0100, Mark Raynsford
wrote:
On 2017-11-17T19:00:54 +
Mark Raynsford wrote:
-1 (non-binding)
The staged versio
On 2017-11-17T19:00:54 +
Mark Raynsford wrote:
> -1 (non-binding)
>
> The staged version still fails with a basic module setup:
>
> https://github.com/io7m/maven-javadoc-bug-20171117
I've submitted a PR that I believe fixes the issue, but I'm not sure if
it's already too late to get it i
-1 (non-binding)
The staged version still fails with a basic module setup:
https://github.com/io7m/maven-javadoc-bug-20171117
--
Mark Raynsford | http://www.io7m.com
pgpI76h0Nsf03.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
We solved 26 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317529&version=12330875&styleName=Text
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%2012317529%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20key%2
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 : Peter Ansell, Olivier Lamy, Anders Hammar, Hervé BOUTEMY, Robert
Scholte
PMC quorum: reached
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 22:05:42 +0200, Robert Scholte
wrote:
Hi,
We solved 18 issues:
+1
On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 22:05:42 +0200, Robert Scholte
wrote:
Hi,
We solved 18 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317529&version=12330875&styleName=Text
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=proje
+1
Regards,
Hervé
Le lundi 17 juillet 2017, 22:05:42 CEST Robert Scholte a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> We solved 18 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317529&ve
> rsion=12330875&styleName=Text
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> https://issues
+1
Tested with Maven 3.3.3 and IBM JDK 7.1 on Windows 7.
/Anders
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 10:05 PM, Robert Scholte
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 18 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
> ctId=12317529&version=12330875&styleName=Text
>
> There are still a couple of
+1
On 18 July 2017 at 06:05, Robert Scholte wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 18 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
> ctId=12317529&version=12330875&styleName=Text
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=proje
+1
Checksum for the source release matches the given sha1.
Plugin works as intended to create valid site (javadoc:javadoc) and
javadoc jars (javadoc:jar) using both JDK-8u131 and JDK-9b177
Only question is whether the Release Notes page on the staging site is
intentionally empty at this point in
Hi,
We solved 18 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317529&version=12330875&styleName=Text
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%2012317529%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20key%2
28 matches
Mail list logo