On Nov 26, 2010, at 10:03 AM, Sebastian Annies wrote:
> We just didn't find it any sooner. I would have if I could.
> Benjamin already applied the patch and we will build our next releases with a
> Maven snapshot and wait for 3.0.2.
Yup, it will come off the grid shortly.
> BR,
> Sebastian
>
We just didn't find it any sooner. I would have if I could.
Benjamin already applied the patch and we will build our next releases
with a Maven snapshot and wait for 3.0.2.
BR,
Sebastian
On 26.11.2010 14:27, Jason van Zyl wrote:
You need to get in the cycle sooner, we're about to release and w
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Benjamin Bentmann, Daniel Kulp, Jason van Zyl, Arnaud
Héritier, Kristian Rosenvold, John Casey, Ralph Goers, Stephen Connolly,
Emmanuel Venisse, Lukas Theussl, Olivier Lamy, Vincent Siveton, Brett
Porter, Hervé Boutemy
+1 (non
You need to get in the cycle sooner, we're about to release and we're not
stopping now.
We'll apply your fix, if appropriate, after the release and the build will be
available on the grid, and in the next release in about 6 weeks.
If you knew that it didn't work in 3.0 then you've had plenty of
-1 non-binding
We discovered a showstopper for us (not specific to 3.0.1 it also occurs
with 3.0) and we would appreciate if you would consider to appy the test
and fix also 72 hours have passed already and give 3.0.1 another try.
The issue prevents us from building a site.
http://jira.codeha
+1
Hervé
Le mardi 23 novembre 2010, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> 3.0.1-RC1 seems to be fine, thanks to those who tested it. So let's do
> the real thing.
>
> We solved 21 issues since 3.0:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16
> 331
>
> There ar
+1
Signatures are good on src and bin tgz, built from source and confirmed ITs
pass locally.
- Brett
On 23/11/2010, at 10:18 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 3.0.1-RC1 seems to be fine, thanks to those who tested it. So let's do the
> real thing.
>
> We solved 21 issues since 3.0:
> h
+1
Flexmojos is perfectly happy with it
VELO
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Vincent Siveton wrote:
> +1
>
> Vincent
>
> 2010/11/23 Benjamin Bentmann :
> > Hi,
> >
> > 3.0.1-RC1 seems to be fine, thanks to those who tested it. So let's do
> the
> > real thing.
> >
> > We solved 21 issues sinc
+1
Vincent
2010/11/23 Benjamin Bentmann :
> Hi,
>
> 3.0.1-RC1 seems to be fine, thanks to those who tested it. So let's do the
> real thing.
>
> We solved 21 issues since 3.0:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16331
>
> There are still a couple of issues l
+1 (non-binding)
/Paul
Quoting Benjamin Bentmann :
> Hi,
>
> 3.0.1-RC1 seems to be fine, thanks to those who tested it. So let's do
> the real thing.
>
> We solved 21 issues since 3.0:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16
> 331
>
> There are still a co
+1
- Olivier
2010/11/23 Benjamin Bentmann :
> Hi,
>
> 3.0.1-RC1 seems to be fine, thanks to those who tested it. So let's do the
> real thing.
>
> We solved 21 issues since 3.0:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16331
>
> There are still a couple of issues
+1
-Lukas
On 11/23/2010 12:18 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
3.0.1-RC1 seems to be fine, thanks to those who tested it. So let's do
the real thing.
We solved 21 issues since 3.0:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16331
There are still a couple of is
+1
Emmanuel
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Benjamin Bentmann <
benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 3.0.1-RC1 seems to be fine, thanks to those who tested it. So let's do the
> real thing.
>
> We solved 21 issues since 3.0:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId
+1
- Stephen
---
Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes are a direct result
of using swype to type on the screen
On 23 Nov 2010 11:18, "Benjamin Bentmann" wrote:
Hi,
3.0.1-RC1 seems to be fine, thanks to those who tested it. So let's do the
real thing.
We solved 21 issues si
+1
Works fine on my projects.
On Nov 23, 2010, at 3:18 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 3.0.1-RC1 seems to be fine, thanks to those who tested it. So let's do the
> real thing.
>
> We solved 21 issues since 3.0:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=1
+1
On 11/23/10 6:18 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
3.0.1-RC1 seems to be fine, thanks to those who tested it. So let's do
the real thing.
We solved 21 issues since 3.0:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16331
There are still a couple of issues left in
+1
Kristian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Non-binding +1; seems to be working fine in NetBeans development builds.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
+1
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Tue, 11/23/10, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> From: Benjamin Bentmann
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0.1
> To: "Maven Developers List"
> Date: Tuesday, November 23, 2010, 11:18 AM
> Hi,
>
> 3.0.1-RC1 seems to be fine, thanks to
+1 (non-binding)
2010/11/23 Igor Fedorenko
> +1.
>
> Both Tycho and m2e work as expected.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Igor
>
>
> On 10-11-23 06:18 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 3.0.1-RC1 seems to be fine, thanks to those who tested it. So let's do
>> the real thing.
>>
>> We solved 21 issu
+1.
Both Tycho and m2e work as expected.
--
Regards,
Igor
On 10-11-23 06:18 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
3.0.1-RC1 seems to be fine, thanks to those who tested it. So let's do
the real thing.
We solved 21 issues since 3.0:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&
+1
Arnaud Héritier
aherit...@apache.org
On Nov 23, 2010, at 12:18 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 3.0.1-RC1 seems to be fine, thanks to those who tested it. So let's do the
> real thing.
>
> We solved 21 issues since 3.0:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=105
+1
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 16:56, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
> On 23 November 2010 11:18, Benjamin Bentmann >wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > 3.0.1-RC1 seems to be fine, thanks to those who tested it. So let's do
> the
> > real thing.
> >
> > We solved 21 issues since 3.0:
> >
> >
> http://jira.codehaus.o
On 23 November 2010 11:18, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 3.0.1-RC1 seems to be fine, thanks to those who tested it. So let's do the
> real thing.
>
> We solved 21 issues since 3.0:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16331
>
> There are still a couple
+1
Works for the builds of the projects I'm working on.
On Nov 23, 2010, at 6:18 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 3.0.1-RC1 seems to be fine, thanks to those who tested it. So let's do the
> real thing.
>
> We solved 21 issues since 3.0:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jsp
+1
Dan
On Tuesday 23 November 2010 6:18:15 am Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 3.0.1-RC1 seems to be fine, thanks to those who tested it. So let's do
> the real thing.
>
> We solved 21 issues since 3.0:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16
> 331
>
>
+1
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 12:23 PM, chemit wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:18:15 +0100
> Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
>
> +1 (non binding)
>
> thanks.
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > 3.0.1-RC1 seems to be fine, thanks to those who tested it. So let's
> > do the real thing.
> >
> > We solved 21 issues since 3.0
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:18:15 +0100
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
+1 (non binding)
thanks.
> Hi,
>
> 3.0.1-RC1 seems to be fine, thanks to those who tested it. So let's
> do the real thing.
>
> We solved 21 issues since 3.0:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&versio
Hi,
3.0.1-RC1 seems to be fine, thanks to those who tested it. So let's do
the real thing.
We solved 21 issues since 3.0:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16331
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNaviga
29 matches
Mail list logo
