Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-4

> I searched on the asf repository [1], [2] but I didn't found it : > > [1] > https://repository.apache.org/index.html#nexus-search;quick~org.apache.maven > [2] > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repositor

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-4

Gilles Scokart wrote: Are you publishing this to an apache maven repository or did you publish it directly into central? I see it at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/3.0-alpha-4/ as found by https://repository.apache.org/index.html#ne

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-4

Are you publishing this to an apache maven repository or did you publish it directly into central? I searched on the asf repository [1], [2] but I didn't found it : [1] https://repository.apache.org/index.html#nexus-search;quick~org.apache.maven

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-4

Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Benjamin Bentmann, Jason van Zyl, Olivier Lamy, Arnaud Héritier +1 (non-binding): Paul Benedict, Stephen Connolly I will promote the artifacts to the central repository and continue with the release. Thanks for all the feedbac

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-4

+1 Tested on several projects Arnaud Héritier Software Factory Manager eXo platform - http://www.exoplatform.com --- http://www.aheritier.net On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > On 2009-11-14, at 4:47 AM, Dan Fabulich wrote: > > >> I was waiting until alpha-3 was out to

Re: Multithreaded testing was: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-4

On 16/11/2009, at 9:22 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > Then I consider you lost. Go back and read what I wrote. At any rate this is > not by biggest concern at the moment. If the conditions 1-3 are met in the > last email and Larry says it's fine, I'm fine. You top replied to several questions refe

Re: Multithreaded testing was: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-4

On 2009-11-16, at 10:15 AM, Brett Porter wrote: You've lost me. Then I consider you lost. Go back and read what I wrote. At any rate this is not by biggest concern at the moment. If the conditions 1-3 are met in the last email and Larry says it's fine, I'm fine. Everything I see at htt

Re: Multithreaded testing was: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-4

You've lost me. Everything I see at http://svn.sonatype.org/m2eclipse/sandbox/trunk/maven-performance-tests/ is under the ALv2 accdg to headers except: - the contents of a test maven repository - http://svn.sonatype.org/m2eclipse/sandbox/trunk/maven-performance-tests/remoteRepo/ which is a sub

Re: Multithreaded testing was: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-4

If you can get Larry to sign off on: 1) We going to keep modifying the source as necessary 2) It's EPL and it should be that way because that's where we got it from 3) And we might want to release it I'm not going to discuss this ad nauseum because I believe Larry would say technically it's

Re: Multithreaded testing was: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-4

On 16/11/2009, at 7:35 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: >> >>> We are likely to make some modifications, if we haven't already, and so >>> it's easier not to put it here. If we made anything more then minimal >>> changes we have to back it out. >> >> You mean >> http://svn.sonatype.org/m2eclipse/san

Re: Multithreaded testing was: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-4

On 2009-11-16, at 9:27 AM, Brett Porter wrote: On 16/11/2009, at 7:14 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html The performance framework is EPL, which is not an authorized license according to our documentation. You mean org.eclipse.test.performance here? We ar

Re: Multithreaded testing was: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-4

On 16/11/2009, at 7:14 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html > > The performance framework is EPL, which is not an authorized license > according to our documentation. You mean org.eclipse.test.performance here? > We are likely to make some modifications, if we h

Re: Multithreaded testing was: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-4

http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html The performance framework is EPL, which is not an authorized license according to our documentation. We are likely to make some modifications, if we haven't already, and so it's easier not to put it here. If we made anything more then minimal changes

Re: Multithreaded testing was: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-4

On Nov 15, 2009, at 3:47 PM, Brett Porter wrote: > > On 15/11/2009, at 6:33 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > >>> I think this is sonatype code that I don't have access to? Can somebody at >>> Sonatype just run my code against the performance framework and see how it >>> goes? >>> >> >> We can gi

Re: Multithreaded testing was: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-4

On 15/11/2009, at 6:33 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: >> I think this is sonatype code that I don't have access to? Can somebody at >> Sonatype just run my code against the performance framework and see how it >> goes? >> > > We can give you access. There are licensing problems with checking it in

Re: Multithreaded testing was: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-4

There you go, it's all yours Dan :-) On 2009-11-14, at 8:38 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Jason van Zyl wrote: We can give you access. Well, http://svn.sonatype.org/m2eclipse/sandbox/trunk/maven-performance-tests/ is already public. Benjamin -

Re: Multithreaded testing was: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-4

Jason van Zyl wrote: We can give you access. Well, http://svn.sonatype.org/m2eclipse/sandbox/trunk/maven-performance-tests/ is already public. Benjamin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For addit

Re: Multithreaded testing was: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-4

On 2009-11-14, at 8:27 PM, Dan Fabulich wrote: Jason van Zyl wrote: Honestly there's not really any public proposal or design to look at Got one now :-) http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Experimental+Multithreading+Support and I really think that we should try your branch a

Multithreaded testing was: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-4

Jason van Zyl wrote: Honestly there's not really any public proposal or design to look at Got one now :-) http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Experimental+Multithreading+Support and I really think that we should try your branch against the performance framework and make sure ev

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-4

On 2009-11-14, at 4:47 AM, Dan Fabulich wrote: I was waiting until alpha-3 was out to merge in the MNG-3004 branch. MNG-3004 passes all ITs, including a few new ITs of the experimental multithreaded mode. Can we recut alpha-4 with MNG-3004 in it? I'd personally still like to see a lit

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-4

I was waiting until alpha-3 was out to merge in the MNG-3004 branch. MNG-3004 passes all ITs, including a few new ITs of the experimental multithreaded mode. Can we recut alpha-4 with MNG-3004 in it? -Dan - To unsubscribe,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-4

+1 Stephen 2009/11/13 Benjamin Bentmann : > Hi, > > Ready for the next round ;-) ? > > We solved 6 issues: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=14951 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?re

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-4

+1 2009/11/13 Benjamin Bentmann : > Hi, > > Ready for the next round ;-) ? > > We solved 6 issues: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=14951 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-4

+1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-4

+1 Keep them coming! On 2009-11-13, at 7:25 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, Ready for the next round ;-) ? We solved 6 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=14951 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Iss

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-4

Hi, Ready for the next round ;-) ? We solved 6 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=14951 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=10500&status=1 Staging repo: https://reposit