[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-12 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Benjamin Bentmann, Arnaud Héritier, Olivier Lamy, Jason van Zyl, Stéphane Nicoll, Dan Fabulich, Brian Fox, Brett Porter, Vincent Siveton, John Casey, Hervé Boutemy +1 (non-binding): Stephen Connolly, Stuart McCulloch, Paul Bene

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-12 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
+1 Hervé Le lundi 09 novembre 2009, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit : > Hi, > > OK, here we go, another alpha release of Maven, for all those brave guys > that want to take it for a test drive ;-) > > We solved many issues: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=14

Re : Re : Re : [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-12 Thread Julien HENRY
OK, thanks - Message d'origine > De : Olivier Lamy > À : Maven Developers List > Envoyé le : Jeu 12 Novembre 2009, 16 h 58 min 00 s > Objet : Re: Re : Re : [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3 > > wagon weddav is not any more included in the distrib. >

Re: Re : Re : [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-12 Thread Olivier Lamy
gt;> Envoyé le : Mar 10 Novembre 2009, 15 h 56 min 15 s >> Objet : Re : [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3 >> >> Hi, >> >> I don't know if it is related to Maven 3, but I'm not able to update to a >> newer >> SNAPSHOT that is available in my

Re : Re : [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-12 Thread Julien HENRY
a known issue? - Message d'origine > De : Julien HENRY > À : Maven Developers List > Envoyé le : Mar 10 Novembre 2009, 15 h 56 min 15 s > Objet : Re : [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3 > > Hi, > > I don't know if it is related to Maven 3, but I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-12 Thread John Casey
+1, seems to run well here. Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, OK, here we go, another alpha release of Maven, for all those brave guys that want to take it for a test drive ;-) We solved many issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=14719 There are stil

Re: IT failure (was: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3)

2009-11-12 Thread Brian Fox
That sounds like the one that is supposed to be fixed in alpha-4 On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Brett Porter wrote: > Doesn't affect my vote, but I noted that this IT fails on 3.0-alpha-3, even > though it is marked as fixed in JIRA: > - mng4361ForceDependencySnapshotUpdate > > Anyone else see

Re: IT failure (was: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3)

2009-11-12 Thread Brett Porter
Doesn't affect my vote, but I noted that this IT fails on 3.0-alpha-3, even though it is marked as fixed in JIRA: - mng4361ForceDependencySnapshotUpdate Anyone else see the same result or should I post logs? Cheers, Brett On 12/11/2009, at 11:00 PM, Brett Porter wrote: > +1 > > I downloaded t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-12 Thread Vincent Siveton
+1 Vincent 2009/11/9 Benjamin Bentmann : > Hi, > > OK, here we go, another alpha release of Maven, for all those brave guys > that want to take it for a test drive ;-) > > We solved many issues: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=14719 > > There are still a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-12 Thread Brett Porter
+1 I downloaded the source tarball and verified the signature matches KEYS. I built from source, then rebuilt the source with itself without error on a clean repository. I'll do some more testing, but that's sufficient for an alpha release. Nice work! Cheers, Brett On 10/11/2009, at 3:39 AM,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-11 Thread Brian Fox
+1 On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Paul Gier wrote: > +1 > I tested it on a few projects and in general it seems to be working well. > > I ran into a problem resolving local snapshots with classifiers after I had > just installed them which appears to be related to an existing problem ni > 2.x [

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-10 Thread Paul Gier
+1 I tested it on a few projects and in general it seems to be working well. I ran into a problem resolving local snapshots with classifiers after I had just installed them which appears to be related to an existing problem ni 2.x [1]. But I had trouble reliably reproducing the without messing

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-10 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 on alpha 3 for my large corporate build (previously untested on 3.x range). A nice 10% faster than 2.2.1 too.

Re: Possible problems with snapshot updates in Maven 3.0-alpha-3 (was Re: Re : [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3)

2009-11-10 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Benjamin Bentmann wrote: If you have -U specified and the maven-metadata-nexus.xml for this parent POM in your local repo is not updated to match the one in your Nexus, that's indeed a bug. I'll look into it for alpha-4. Confirmed and tracked in [0]. If you like, CI already produced a fixed

Re: Compat problems between Maven 3.0-alpha-3 and plugin (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3)

2009-11-10 Thread Tony Chemit
Le Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:48:18 +0100, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit : > Tony Chemit wrote: > > > Any idea about it ? > > Sorry, not from those few bits of info. Please fill an issue at > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG with as much information attached as > available. I ideally need something t

Compat problems between Maven 3.0-alpha-3 and plugin (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3)

2009-11-10 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Tony Chemit wrote: Any idea about it ? Sorry, not from those few bits of info. Please fill an issue at http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG with as much information attached as available. I ideally need something to reproduce, so a minimal test project or the SVN URL to your project with ste

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-10 Thread Tony Chemit
Le Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:26:23 +0100, Tony Chemit a écrit : > Le Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:39:09 +0100, > Benjamin Bentmann a écrit : > > > Hi, > > > > OK, here we go, another alpha release of Maven, for all those brave guys > > that want to take it for a test drive ;-) > > > +1, but some of our plu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-10 Thread Tony Chemit
Le Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:39:09 +0100, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit : > Hi, > > OK, here we go, another alpha release of Maven, for all those brave guys > that want to take it for a test drive ;-) > +1, but some of our plugins does not works any longer. In the defect plugin, we use the maven 2.2.1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-10 Thread Dan Fabulich
It's clear that the consensus is against landing MNG-3004 for alpha-3, so I'll pull back. I've tested alpha-3 against several builds and found it good, thanks to Benjamin's quick bugfixing last week. +1 Dan Fabulich wrote: I just posted a proposal that the code I checked in before this an

Possible problems with snapshot updates in Maven 3.0-alpha-3 (was Re: Re : [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3)

2009-11-10 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Julien HENRY schrieb: I don't know if it is related to Maven 3, but I'm not able to update to a newer SNAPSHOT that is available in my corporate repository, even by using the -U command line option. It seems Maven is not even asking the repository manager for a new version. If you have -U s

Re : [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-10 Thread Julien HENRY
ce SNAPSHOT update whatever is in the local repository... Regards, Julien - Message d'origine > De : Benjamin Bentmann > À : Maven Developers List > Envoyé le : Lun 9 Novembre 2009, 17 h 39 min 09 s > Objet : [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3 > > Hi, &

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-10 Thread Paul Benedict
+1 with my builds. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-10 Thread Stuart McCulloch
2009/11/10 Benjamin Bentmann > Hi, > > OK, here we go, another alpha release of Maven, for all those brave guys > that want to take it for a test drive ;-) > > We solved many issues: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=14719 > > There are still a couple of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-10 Thread Stephane Nicoll
+1 Stéphane On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > OK, here we go, another alpha release of Maven, for all those brave guys > that want to take it for a test drive ;-) > > We solved many issues: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&ver

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-10 Thread Jason van Zyl
+1 On 2009-11-10, at 10:03 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: +1 Tested with company builds. Just a remark : the release note need to include some links to asf wiki regarding compatibility and site plugin. Thanks, -- Olivier 2009/11/9 Benjamin Bentmann : Hi, OK, here we go, another alpha release of Ma

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-10 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 Tested with company builds. Just a remark : the release note need to include some links to asf wiki regarding compatibility and site plugin. Thanks, -- Olivier 2009/11/9 Benjamin Bentmann : > Hi, > > OK, here we go, another alpha release of Maven, for all those brave guys > that want to take i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-09 Thread Brian Fox
> I haven't tested alpha-3 yet, but I don't want to see anything derail that, > since it's been a long time coming. I think it would be better for issues > found after the last 11 months of changes to be separate from anything > introduced by a multi-threaded build. Agreed. Unless you can attach t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-09 Thread Brett Porter
On 10/11/2009, at 2:05 PM, Dan Fabulich wrote: I just posted a proposal that the code I checked in before this announcement should make it in to alpha-3. I think if I vote -1 that will veto the release. I don't think that's professional (I did just break the build three days before th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-09 Thread Dan Fabulich
I just posted a proposal that the code I checked in before this announcement should make it in to alpha-3. I think if I vote -1 that will veto the release. I don't think that's professional (I did just break the build three days before the release vote, and I'm still quite ashamed by it), s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-09 Thread Henri Gomez
+0 (non binding) I'm using m2eclipse from the trunk, using the embedded maven 3 from the trunk, to build several in-house projects. No problems for now 2009/11/9 Arnaud HERITIER : > +1 > Tested with success on several projects > It becomes to be interesting :-) > > Arnaud Héritier > Software Fact

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-09 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
+1 Tested with success on several projects It becomes to be interesting :-) Arnaud Héritier Software Factory Manager eXo platform - http://www.exoplatform.com --- http://www.aheritier.net On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 from me > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-09 Thread Stephen Connolly
+1 from me 2009/11/9 Benjamin Bentmann : > Hi, > > OK, here we go, another alpha release of Maven, for all those brave guys > that want to take it for a test drive ;-) > > We solved many issues: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=14719 > > There are still a

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-09 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi, OK, here we go, another alpha release of Maven, for all those brave guys that want to take it for a test drive ;-) We solved many issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=14719 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: http://jira.codehaus.or