w00t - congrats to all developers and testers alike.
Time to go add an enforcer rule to all of $works projects for a 3.0 minimum
:)
--
Pull me down under...
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> I will promote the artifacts to the central repository and continue with
>
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Benjamin Bentmann, Jason van Zyl, Emmanuel Venisse,
Stephen Connolly, John Casey, Vincent Siveton, Daniel Kulp, Stéphane
Nicoll, Hervé Boutemy, Arnaud Héritier, Olivier Lamy, Dennis Lundberg,
Brett Porter, Lukas Theussl, Carlos
+1
Used to build Sonar, no problem.
- Fabrice
belling...@apache.org
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
> any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this
> marat
Le Mon, 04 Oct 2010 14:16:07 +0200,
Benjamin Bentmann a écrit :
Hi Benjamin,
72 hours passed, we are so excited to have the final decision ? Would
it be today ?
Thanks ;)
Tony.
> Hi,
>
> feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not
> aware of any major regression so let'
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware
> of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of
> this marathon.
>
> We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3:
>
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?project
+1 (non-binding)
everything by the book!
On 10/4/10 5:16 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not
aware of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing
line of this marathon.
We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3:
http
Hi
+1 (non-binding)
works for me.
Regards
Mark Donszelmann
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
> any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this
> marathon.
>
> We
+1
Woohoo!
Thanks,
~t~
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
> any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this
> marathon.
>
> We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3:
>
+1
Works like a champ, draws less than an amp
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
+1 looks fine for me though
(tried with OpenWebBeans and in company projects)
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Tue, 10/5/10, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> From: Dennis Lundberg
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0
> To: "Maven Developers List"
> Date: Tuesday, October 5, 2
+1
On Oct 4, 2010, at 8:16 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
> any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this
> marathon.
>
> We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3:
> http://jira.codehaus.or
+1
Kristian
ma., 04.10.2010 kl. 14.16 +0200, skrev Benjamin Bentmann:
> Hi,
>
> feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware
> of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of
> this marathon.
>
> We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3:
> http://j
+1
Niall
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
> any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this
> marathon.
>
> We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3:
> http://jira.code
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> +1 tested in some projects and works fine
>
> Are we doing a PR with the press team?
I pinged Sally earlier this month and will follow up.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Mark Derricutt wrote:
>> +1 Bring on the 3.0!
>> --
>> Pull me
+1 tested in some projects and works fine
Are we doing a PR with the press team?
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Mark Derricutt wrote:
> +1 Bring on the 3.0!
> --
> Pull me down under...
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>
+1 Bring on the 3.0!
--
Pull me down under...
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> +1
>
+1
-Lukas
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware
of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of
this marathon.
We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId
+1
There are a couple of issues (MNG-1911, MNG-4850, and various output
improvements), but not worth holding this up any longer. It's well overdue.
- Brett
On 04/10/2010, at 11:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
On 5 October 2010 22:43, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> To me the situation looks like this: The ProjectSorter serves one purpose,
> that is to figure out the build order of projects within a reactor. Unless I
> misunderstand, you seem to have a different use case and merely use the
> ProjectSorter be
Mark Hobson wrote:
Is there a way that we could support both behaviours?
To me the situation looks like this: The ProjectSorter serves one
purpose, that is to figure out the build order of projects within a
reactor. Unless I misunderstand, you seem to have a different use case
and merely us
On 5 October 2010 21:50, Mark Hobson wrote:
> I've raised MNG-4854 [1] to demonstrate the problem.
Benjamin, I understand your comment on the issue. The situation I
have is with maven-runtime where all dependencies have already been
mediated, so project:1.0 is in fact using dependency:1.0 at run
On 5 October 2010 18:35, Mark Hobson wrote:
> I've taken a quick look at ProjectSorter in the debugger and it looks
> like it's skipping vertexes where versions don't match. For example,
> if A depends on B:1.0 but B is resolved to 1.1 (via resolution or
> management) then A->B:1.0 is lost. One
+1 from me
I've tried it on my private projects and the projects at my day job and
all seems well.
On 2010-10-04 14:16, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware
> of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line o
Branching the m3 vote thread:
On 5 October 2010 16:22, Mark Hobson wrote:
> Sorry, I don't think I was clear enough before. It's not the ordering
> of elements at the same level that's a problem, it's that the element
> order is wrong. I was also meaning deterministic with regard from
> m2.2.1
On 5 October 2010 15:54, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> a DAG which is toposorted is naturally unordered for elements at the same
> level in a graph. The set is deterministic, the order of that set is not.
> Relying on any ordering for something that is naturally unordered is not
> really a great idea
On Oct 5, 2010, at 10:04 AM, Mark Hobson wrote:
> On 5 October 2010 14:31, Baptiste MATHUS wrote:
>> +1.
>> It'd confirm what I checked yesterday (see my other mail). I was having
>> problem with XML parser due to a different classpath ordering inside
>> surefire between m2.2.1 and m3.
>>
>> As
Benjamin Bentmann
> À : Maven Developers List
> Envoyé le : Lun 4 octobre 2010, 14h 16min 07s
> Objet : [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0
>
> Hi,
>
> feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
> any
>major regression so let's
On 5 October 2010 14:31, Baptiste MATHUS wrote:
> +1.
> It'd confirm what I checked yesterday (see my other mail). I was having
> problem with XML parser due to a different classpath ordering inside
> surefire between m2.2.1 and m3.
>
> As Olivier said, it's true it's bad to rely on classpath orde
+1 works for me.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
2010/10/5 Mark Hobson
> It generally works for my builds apart from the behaviour of an
> internal Maven plugin. This plugin uses the shared component
> maven-runtime to determine the dependency order of the project's
> dependencies, which is subtly different between m2.2.1 and m3. I
>
+1.
It'
It generally works for my builds apart from the behaviour of an
internal Maven plugin. This plugin uses the shared component
maven-runtime to determine the dependency order of the project's
dependencies, which is subtly different between m2.2.1 and m3. I
haven't had time to fully debug the proble
+1
Le 5 octobre 2010 00:44, Arnaud Héritier a écrit :
> Tested on various projects.
> +1
>
> Arnaud
>
> On Oct 4, 2010, at 2:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
>> any major regression so let's try and cross th
Tested on various projects.
+1
Arnaud
On Oct 4, 2010, at 2:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
> any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this
> marathon.
>
> We solved 31 issues since
-0. I have the same objection to Aether that I noted when it was introduced.
It is now much more difficult for me to enhance dependency resolution in Maven
to include metadata beyond what the Aether api supports since Aether is not
part of Maven.
Ralph
On Oct 4, 2010, at 5:16 AM, Benjamin Ben
On 4 October 2010 05:16, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
> any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this
> marathon.
I seem to have a problem with a combination of Maven 2 and 3:
http://mail-archives.a
+1 (non binding)
Tested on all Sonar projects including parallel builds and Tycho-based.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 21:57, Toni Menzel wrote:
> +1 (non binding) OPS4J stuff builds on and works with this cool release!
>
> Toni
>
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY
> wrote:
> > +1
> >
>
+1 (non binding) OPS4J stuff builds on and works with this cool release!
Toni
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> +1
>
> Hervé
>
> Le lundi 04 octobre 2010, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware
>> of
+1
Hervé
Le lundi 04 octobre 2010, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware
> of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of
> this marathon.
>
> We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3:
> http://jira.codeha
Nonbinding +1; seems to be working well embedded in NetBeans IDE development
builds. Nice job.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
+1. maven 3.0 looks good on tycho.
--
Regards,
Igor
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware
of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of
this marathon.
We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3:
http://jira.cod
+1 (non-binding)
> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 17:33:04 +0200
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0
> From: m...@batmat.net
> To: dev@maven.apache.org
>
> (non-binding.Sorry)
>
> 2010/10/4 Baptiste MATHUS
>
> > +1
> >
> > After fixing our co
(non-binding.Sorry)
2010/10/4 Baptiste MATHUS
> +1
>
> After fixing our conf (many xml parsers in the classpath), maven 3.0 built
> them fine, so it's not blocking at all. I'll have to internally investigate
> where the difference comes from, if possible I might file the corresponding
> issue on
+1
After fixing our conf (many xml parsers in the classpath), maven 3.0 built
them fine, so it's not blocking at all. I'll have to internally investigate
where the difference comes from, if possible I might file the corresponding
issue once analyzed.
Baptiste
2010/10/4 Stephane Nicoll
> +1
>
>
+1
Stéphane
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
> any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this
> marathon.
>
> We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3:
>
> http://jir
+1 (non-binding)
/Paul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
+1
Dan
On Monday 04 October 2010 8:16:07 am Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware
> of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of
> this marathon.
>
> We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3:
> http://jir
+1 go go maven gadgets!
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 09:57, Vincent Siveton wrote:
> yeah +1
>
> Vincent
>
> 2010/10/4 Benjamin Bentmann :
>> Hi,
>>
>> feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
>> any major regression so l
yeah +1
Vincent
2010/10/4 Benjamin Bentmann :
> Hi,
>
> feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
> any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this
> marathon.
>
> We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Relea
+1
On 10/4/10 8:16 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware
of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of
this marathon.
We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa
+1
Stephen
On 4 October 2010 15:06, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> +1
>
> Emmanuel
>
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann <
> benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu
> > wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware
> of
> > any major regression so
+1,
works fine for me
Nicolas
2010/10/4 Greg Akins
> +1
>
> Ran against all my projects successfully
>
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Benjamin Bentmann
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware
> of
> > any major regression so let's try
+1
Emmanuel
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
> any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this
> marathon.
>
> We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3:
>
> http://jir
+1
Ran against all my projects successfully
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Benjamin Bentmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
> any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this
> marathon.
>
> We solved 31 issues s
+1
Let it be free!
On Oct 4, 2010, at 8:16 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
> any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this
> marathon.
>
> We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3:
> http:/
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware
of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of
this marathon.
We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=13142
There are still
Benjamin Bentmann
> À : Maven Developers List
> Envoyé le : Lun 4 octobre 2010, 14h 16min 07s
> Objet : [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0
>
> Hi,
>
> feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
> any
>major regression so let's try and cr
On 4 October 2010 13:16, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
> any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this
> marathon.
>
> We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/
+1 (non-binding)
Works fine for our projects.
Great job guys.
Le Mon, 04 Oct 2010 14:16:07 +0200,
Benjamin Bentmann a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not
> aware of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing
> line of this maratho
+1
Vincent
2010/8/30 Benjamin Bentmann :
> Hi,
>
> what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here we
> go!
>
> Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and
> Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on these new
> components
Sorry, for the late response. I'm running into a few issues building
the JBoss App server with beta-3. I'm currently trying to narrow down
the issues enough to create small test projects/test cases.
The issues seem to be related to very specific edge cases, so I don't
think they are things to ho
Hi,
Despite a few known bugs in the code, I consider the vote has passed
with the following result:
+1 (binding): Benjamin Bentmann, Jason van Zyl, Brian Fox, Emmanuel
Venisse, Arnaud Héritier, Oliver Lamy, Kristian Rosenvold
+1 (non-binding): Paul Merlin, Stephen Connolly, Tony Chemit, Igo
+1 (non binding)
works fine with gwt-maven plugin
2010/9/2 Hervé BOUTEMY
> +1
>
> Hervé
>
> Le lundi 30 août 2010, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here
> > we go!
> >
> > Apart from another few regression fixes, this
+1
Hervé
Le lundi 30 août 2010, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here
> we go!
>
> Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and
> Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on t
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Given that this is just one plugin, I give this candidate my +1. We
should note this as a known issue in the release notes though.
Please go ahead and fill an issue in MNG.
Benjamin
-
To unsubscribe,
Comparing the results between beta-2 and beta-3 I see a difference in my
builds for the Appassembler Maven Plugin (@mojo.codehaus.org). In beta-2
the plugin (correctly) assembles the dependencies in a flat structure in
my configured "lib" directory. Whereas beta-3 puts the dependencies in
my config
+1
Kristian
Den 30.08.2010 15:09, skrev Benjamin Bentmann:
Hi,
what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So
here we go!
Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice
and Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on
these new
+1
2010/8/30 Benjamin Bentmann :
> Hi,
>
> what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here we
> go!
>
> Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and
> Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on these new
> components.
>
> Ove
+1
Arnaud Héritier
aherit...@apache.org
On Aug 30, 2010, at 3:09 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here we go!
>
> Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and
> Aether [0] and shall help to ge
I opened http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4786 . The test case comes
directly from the Maven book (see
http://www.sonatype.com/books/mhandbook/reference/ch04s04.html)
2010/8/31 Benjamin Bentmann
> Vincent Latombe wrote:
>
> I'm getting an NPE, calling a plugin that uses ant scripts
>> Caused
Vincent Latombe wrote:
I'm getting an NPE, calling a plugin that uses ant scripts
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.maven.script.ant.AntMojoWrapper.execute(AntMojoWrapper.java:126)
at
org.apache.maven.plugin.DefaultBuildPluginManager.executeMojo(DefaultBui
velopers List
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)
>
> Hi,
>
> what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here
> we go!
>
> Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and
> Aether [0] and shall help to
+1 (non-binding)
"better, stronger, faster" :-)
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Bentmann [mailto:benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu]
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 8:09 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)
Hi,
what's a better s
+1 The artifacts I was getting the NPEs on during release no longer NPE with
current SNAPSHOTs and this build.
--
Pull me down under...
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Benjamin Bentmann <
benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-
+1
20-some modules with AspectJ, built, deploy.
Terracotta plugin 1.4.0 failed to execute tests with NPE in aether code
[MNG-4785], worked fine in beta-2. But imho - one plugin is not a reason
to stop this version, could be fixed in beta-4
On 8/30/10 6:09 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
+1 (non binding).
Tested on a 30+ multimodule build without problem.
2010/8/30 Igor Fedorenko
> +1. Both tycho and m2eclipse builds are happy.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Igor
>
>
> Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here we
>> go!
+1. Both tycho and m2eclipse builds are happy.
--
Regards,
Igor
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here
we go!
Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and
Aether [0] and shall help to get some more co
+1
Le Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:09:28 +0200,
Benjamin Bentmann a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here
> we go!
>
> Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and
> Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community te
+1
Emmanuel
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Benjamin Bentmann <
benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here we
> go!
>
>
> Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and
> Aether [0] and shall help
I'm seeing a regression on 3.0-beta-2 with respect to time for my work's
"build most everything aggregator pom" build (mvn clean install -DskipTest)
Memory seems improved:
3.0-beta-3: Final Memory: 324M/760M Total time: 14:02.778s
3.0-beta-2: Final Memory: 524M/800M Total time: 8:58.144s
Nothin
Plus 1. (just discovered the "plus" key on my board is broken)
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Benjamin Bentmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here we
> go!
>
> Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and
> Ae
+1 (non-binding)
Tested with my oss and work projects.
Tested a release process using git.
/Paul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
+1
On Aug 30, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here we go!
>
> Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and
> Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on these
Hi,
what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here
we go!
Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and
Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on these
new components.
Overall, we solved 19 issues:
http://jira.codeha
Not yet
Arnaud
On Aug 28, 2010, at 6:49 PM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> With the vote canceled, I may have missed the respin. Is there a new
> build available?
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For a
With the vote canceled, I may have missed the respin. Is there a new
build available?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
If there's any further information I can give let me know.
I suspect there's something to do with the dependencies in the project, as
some of our artifacts released fine, but 3-4 had this NPE.
1) We use version ranges for our internal dependecies, such as [2.0.0,3.0.0)
2) We're using nexus 1.5.x
Mark Derricutt wrote:
-1 - I'm getting NullPointerExceptions with the aether in todays current
nightly build when doing releases.
https://gist.github.com/8ac6e71ad49cf8928549
Raised as http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4779
Thanks, I hereby cancel the vote to fix this first.
Benjamin
--
+1 (non-binding)
2010/8/26 Paul Merlin
>
> +1
>
> /Paul
>
> Quoting Benjamin Bentmann :
> > Hi,
> >
> > apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and
> > Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on these
> > new components. Overall, we solved 16 iss
+1
/Paul
Quoting Benjamin Bentmann :
> Hi,
>
> apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and
> Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on these
> new components. Overall, we solved 16 issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proj
-1 - I'm getting NullPointerExceptions with the aether in todays current
nightly build when doing releases.
https://gist.github.com/8ac6e71ad49cf8928549
Raised as http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4779
--
Pull me down under...
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Oleg Gusakov
wrote:
> +1
>
> 2
+1
20-some module project with AspectJ & Terracotta - no issues.
On 8/25/10 4:36 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice
and Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on
these new components. Overall, we solved
+1
On Aug 25, 2010, at 4:36 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and
> Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on these new
> components. Overall, we solved 16 issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/
Hi,
apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and
Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on these
new components. Overall, we solved 16 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16681
There are still a cou
+100 - works on one of my OSGi artifacts where beta-1 ( and last SNAPSHOTs
from a week or so ago ) failed.
My only issue left is the lack of -SNAPSHOTs in version ranges ( an ongoing
M3 gripe that hopefully some mid-way resolution can be discovered ).
--
Pull me down under...
On Wed, Aug 11, 2
lukewpatterson wrote:
my project never explicitly defines the project.url element in the pom [...]
"The parameters 'docURL' for goal ...:generate-osgi-manifest are missing or
invalid..."
like I said, this could very well be the desired behavior, not sure what
missing pom elements default to
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Benjamin Bentmann, Jason van Zyl, Hervé Boutemy, Olivier
Lamy, Daniel Kulp, Stéphane Nicoll, Arnaud Héritier, Lukas Theussl,
Emmanuel Venisse, Vincent Siveton, Brian Fox, Ralph Goers
+1 (non-binding): Christian Edward Gruber, E
noticed different behavior when running <=beta-1 and this, I'm guessing it's
related to: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4615 ([regression] @required
plugin parameters are not validated)
the new behavior might actually be the desired behavior, not sure
from the plugin's plugin.xml:
+1 from me, works on our tricky builds
-Stephen
On 7 August 2010 12:16, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 28 issues:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16090
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/se
+1 Works well on our complex projects too.
-Ben
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 28 issues:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16090
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
> http://jira.codeha
+1
Vincent
Le 2010-08-09 à 14:56, Kristian Rosenvold
a écrit :
+1
Kristian
lø., 07.08.2010 kl. 13.16 +0200, skrev Benjamin Bentmann:
Hi,
We solved 28 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16090
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
1 - 100 of 288 matches
Mail list logo