Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-08 Thread Mark Derricutt
w00t - congrats to all developers and testers alike. Time to go add an enforcer rule to all of $works projects for a 3.0 minimum :) -- Pull me down under... On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > I will promote the artifacts to the central repository and continue with >

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-08 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Benjamin Bentmann, Jason van Zyl, Emmanuel Venisse, Stephen Connolly, John Casey, Vincent Siveton, Daniel Kulp, Stéphane Nicoll, Hervé Boutemy, Arnaud Héritier, Olivier Lamy, Dennis Lundberg, Brett Porter, Lukas Theussl, Carlos

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-08 Thread Fabrice Bellingard
+1 Used to build Sonar, no problem. - Fabrice belling...@apache.org On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of > any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this > marat

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-08 Thread chemit
Le Mon, 04 Oct 2010 14:16:07 +0200, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit : Hi Benjamin, 72 hours passed, we are so excited to have the final decision ? Would it be today ? Thanks ;) Tony. > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not > aware of any major regression so let'

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-08 Thread Jörg Schaible
Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware > of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of > this marathon. > > We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?project

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-07 Thread Oleg Gusakov
+1 (non-binding) everything by the book! On 10/4/10 5:16 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this marathon. We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3: http

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-07 Thread Mark Donszelmann
Hi +1 (non-binding) works for me. Regards Mark Donszelmann On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of > any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this > marathon. > > We

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-07 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 Woohoo! Thanks, ~t~ On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of > any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this > marathon. > > We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-07 Thread Luke Patterson
+1 Works like a champ, draws less than an amp - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-07 Thread Mark Struberg
+1 looks fine for me though (tried with OpenWebBeans and in company projects) LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 10/5/10, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > From: Dennis Lundberg > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0 > To: "Maven Developers List" > Date: Tuesday, October 5, 2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-07 Thread Brian Fox
+1 On Oct 4, 2010, at 8:16 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of > any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this > marathon. > > We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3: > http://jira.codehaus.or

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-07 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 Kristian ma., 04.10.2010 kl. 14.16 +0200, skrev Benjamin Bentmann: > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware > of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of > this marathon. > > We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3: > http://j

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-06 Thread Niall Pemberton
+1 Niall On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of > any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this > marathon. > > We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3: > http://jira.code

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-06 Thread Brian Fox
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote: > +1 tested in some projects and works fine > > Are we doing a PR with the press team? I pinged Sally earlier this month and will follow up. > > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Mark Derricutt wrote: >> +1 Bring on the 3.0! >> -- >> Pull me

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-06 Thread Carlos Sanchez
+1 tested in some projects and works fine Are we doing a PR with the press team? On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Mark Derricutt wrote: > +1 Bring on the 3.0! > -- > Pull me down under... > > > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Brett Porter wrote: > >> +1 >> >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-06 Thread Mark Derricutt
+1 Bring on the 3.0! -- Pull me down under... On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Brett Porter wrote: > +1 >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-06 Thread Lukas Theussl
+1 -Lukas Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this marathon. We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-05 Thread Brett Porter
+1 There are a couple of issues (MNG-1911, MNG-4850, and various output improvements), but not worth holding this up any longer. It's well overdue. - Brett On 04/10/2010, at 11:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of

Re: [m3] ProjectSorter problems (was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0)

2010-10-05 Thread Mark Hobson
On 5 October 2010 22:43, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > To me the situation looks like this: The ProjectSorter serves one purpose, > that is to figure out the build order of projects within a reactor. Unless I > misunderstand, you seem to have a different use case and merely use the > ProjectSorter be

Re: [m3] ProjectSorter problems (was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0)

2010-10-05 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Mark Hobson wrote: Is there a way that we could support both behaviours? To me the situation looks like this: The ProjectSorter serves one purpose, that is to figure out the build order of projects within a reactor. Unless I misunderstand, you seem to have a different use case and merely us

Re: [m3] ProjectSorter problems (was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0)

2010-10-05 Thread Mark Hobson
On 5 October 2010 21:50, Mark Hobson wrote: > I've raised MNG-4854 [1] to demonstrate the problem. Benjamin, I understand your comment on the issue. The situation I have is with maven-runtime where all dependencies have already been mediated, so project:1.0 is in fact using dependency:1.0 at run

Re: [m3] ProjectSorter problems (was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0)

2010-10-05 Thread Mark Hobson
On 5 October 2010 18:35, Mark Hobson wrote: > I've taken a quick look at ProjectSorter in the debugger and it looks > like it's skipping vertexes where versions don't match.  For example, > if A depends on B:1.0 but B is resolved to 1.1 (via resolution or > management) then A->B:1.0 is lost.  One

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-05 Thread Dennis Lundberg
+1 from me I've tried it on my private projects and the projects at my day job and all seems well. On 2010-10-04 14:16, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware > of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line o

[m3] ProjectSorter problems (was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0)

2010-10-05 Thread Mark Hobson
Branching the m3 vote thread: On 5 October 2010 16:22, Mark Hobson wrote: > Sorry, I don't think I was clear enough before.  It's not the ordering > of elements at the same level that's a problem, it's that the element > order is wrong.  I was also meaning deterministic with regard from > m2.2.1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-05 Thread Mark Hobson
On 5 October 2010 15:54, Jason van Zyl wrote: > a DAG which is toposorted is naturally unordered for elements at the same > level in a graph.  The set is deterministic, the order of that set is not. > Relying on any ordering for something that is naturally unordered is not > really a great idea

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-05 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Oct 5, 2010, at 10:04 AM, Mark Hobson wrote: > On 5 October 2010 14:31, Baptiste MATHUS wrote: >> +1. >> It'd confirm what I checked yesterday (see my other mail). I was having >> problem with XML parser due to a different classpath ordering inside >> surefire between m2.2.1 and m3. >> >> As

Re : [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-05 Thread Julien HENRY
Benjamin Bentmann > À : Maven Developers List > Envoyé le : Lun 4 octobre 2010, 14h 16min 07s > Objet : [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0 > > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of > any >major regression so let's

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-05 Thread Mark Hobson
On 5 October 2010 14:31, Baptiste MATHUS wrote: > +1. > It'd confirm what I checked yesterday (see my other mail). I was having > problem with XML parser due to a different classpath ordering inside > surefire between m2.2.1 and m3. > > As Olivier said, it's true it's bad to rely on classpath orde

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-05 Thread Paul Benedict
+1 works for me. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-05 Thread Baptiste MATHUS
2010/10/5 Mark Hobson > It generally works for my builds apart from the behaviour of an > internal Maven plugin. This plugin uses the shared component > maven-runtime to determine the dependency order of the project's > dependencies, which is subtly different between m2.2.1 and m3. I > +1. It'

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-05 Thread Mark Hobson
It generally works for my builds apart from the behaviour of an internal Maven plugin. This plugin uses the shared component maven-runtime to determine the dependency order of the project's dependencies, which is subtly different between m2.2.1 and m3. I haven't had time to fully debug the proble

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-05 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 Le 5 octobre 2010 00:44, Arnaud Héritier a écrit : > Tested on various projects. > +1 > > Arnaud > > On Oct 4, 2010, at 2:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of >> any major regression so let's try and cross th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Arnaud Héritier
Tested on various projects. +1 Arnaud On Oct 4, 2010, at 2:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of > any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this > marathon. > > We solved 31 issues since

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Ralph Goers
-0. I have the same objection to Aether that I noted when it was introduced. It is now much more difficult for me to enhance dependency resolution in Maven to include metadata beyond what the Aether api supports since Aether is not part of Maven. Ralph On Oct 4, 2010, at 5:16 AM, Benjamin Ben

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Hilco Wijbenga
On 4 October 2010 05:16, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of > any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this > marathon. I seem to have a problem with a combination of Maven 2 and 3: http://mail-archives.a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Evgeny Mandrikov
+1 (non binding) Tested on all Sonar projects including parallel builds and Tycho-based. On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 21:57, Toni Menzel wrote: > +1 (non binding) OPS4J stuff builds on and works with this cool release! > > Toni > > On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY > wrote: > > +1 > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Toni Menzel
+1 (non binding) OPS4J stuff builds on and works with this cool release! Toni On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > +1 > > Hervé > > Le lundi 04 octobre 2010, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit : >> Hi, >> >> feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware >> of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
+1 Hervé Le lundi 04 octobre 2010, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit : > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware > of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of > this marathon. > > We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3: > http://jira.codeha

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Jesse Glick
Nonbinding +1; seems to be working well embedded in NetBeans IDE development builds. Nice job. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Igor Fedorenko
+1. maven 3.0 looks good on tycho. -- Regards, Igor Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this marathon. We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3: http://jira.cod

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Robert Scholte
+1 (non-binding) > Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 17:33:04 +0200 > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0 > From: m...@batmat.net > To: dev@maven.apache.org > > (non-binding.Sorry) > > 2010/10/4 Baptiste MATHUS > > > +1 > > > > After fixing our co

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Baptiste MATHUS
(non-binding.Sorry) 2010/10/4 Baptiste MATHUS > +1 > > After fixing our conf (many xml parsers in the classpath), maven 3.0 built > them fine, so it's not blocking at all. I'll have to internally investigate > where the difference comes from, if possible I might file the corresponding > issue on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Baptiste MATHUS
+1 After fixing our conf (many xml parsers in the classpath), maven 3.0 built them fine, so it's not blocking at all. I'll have to internally investigate where the difference comes from, if possible I might file the corresponding issue once analyzed. Baptiste 2010/10/4 Stephane Nicoll > +1 > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Stephane Nicoll
+1 Stéphane On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of > any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this > marathon. > > We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3: > > http://jir

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Paul Merlin
+1 (non-binding) /Paul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Daniel Kulp
+1 Dan On Monday 04 October 2010 8:16:07 am Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware > of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of > this marathon. > > We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3: > http://jir

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Jesse McConnell
+1 go go maven gadgets! -- jesse mcconnell jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 09:57, Vincent Siveton wrote: > yeah +1 > > Vincent > > 2010/10/4 Benjamin Bentmann : >> Hi, >> >> feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of >> any major regression so l

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Vincent Siveton
yeah +1 Vincent 2010/10/4 Benjamin Bentmann : > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of > any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this > marathon. > > We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Relea

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread John Casey
+1 On 10/4/10 8:16 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this marathon. We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Stephen Connolly
+1 Stephen On 4 October 2010 15:06, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: > +1 > > Emmanuel > > On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann < > benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware > of > > any major regression so

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread nicolas de loof
+1, works fine for me Nicolas 2010/10/4 Greg Akins > +1 > > Ran against all my projects successfully > > On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Benjamin Bentmann > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware > of > > any major regression so let's try

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
+1 Emmanuel On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of > any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this > marathon. > > We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3: > > http://jir

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Greg Akins
+1 Ran against all my projects successfully On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of > any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this > marathon. > > We solved 31 issues s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Jason van Zyl
+1 Let it be free! On Oct 4, 2010, at 8:16 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of > any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this > marathon. > > We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3: > http:/

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi, feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this marathon. We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=13142 There are still

Re : [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Julien HENRY
Benjamin Bentmann > À : Maven Developers List > Envoyé le : Lun 4 octobre 2010, 14h 16min 07s > Objet : [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0 > > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of > any >major regression so let's try and cr

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread Stuart McCulloch
On 4 October 2010 13:16, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of > any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this > marathon. > > We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

2010-10-04 Thread chemit
+1 (non-binding) Works fine for our projects. Great job guys. Le Mon, 04 Oct 2010 14:16:07 +0200, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit : > Hi, > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not > aware of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing > line of this maratho

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-09-03 Thread Vincent Siveton
+1 Vincent 2010/8/30 Benjamin Bentmann : > Hi, > > what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here we > go! > > Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and > Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on these new > components

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-09-02 Thread Paul Gier
Sorry, for the late response. I'm running into a few issues building the JBoss App server with beta-3. I'm currently trying to narrow down the issues enough to create small test projects/test cases. The issues seem to be related to very specific edge cases, so I don't think they are things to ho

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-09-02 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi, Despite a few known bugs in the code, I consider the vote has passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Benjamin Bentmann, Jason van Zyl, Brian Fox, Emmanuel Venisse, Arnaud Héritier, Oliver Lamy, Kristian Rosenvold +1 (non-binding): Paul Merlin, Stephen Connolly, Tony Chemit, Igo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-09-01 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 (non binding) works fine with gwt-maven plugin 2010/9/2 Hervé BOUTEMY > +1 > > Hervé > > Le lundi 30 août 2010, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here > > we go! > > > > Apart from another few regression fixes, this

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-09-01 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
+1 Hervé Le lundi 30 août 2010, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit : > Hi, > > what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here > we go! > > Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and > Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-09-01 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Dennis Lundberg wrote: Given that this is just one plugin, I give this candidate my +1. We should note this as a known issue in the release notes though. Please go ahead and fill an issue in MNG. Benjamin - To unsubscribe,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-09-01 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Comparing the results between beta-2 and beta-3 I see a difference in my builds for the Appassembler Maven Plugin (@mojo.codehaus.org). In beta-2 the plugin (correctly) assembles the dependencies in a flat structure in my configured "lib" directory. Whereas beta-3 puts the dependencies in my config

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-09-01 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 Kristian Den 30.08.2010 15:09, skrev Benjamin Bentmann: Hi, what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here we go! Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on these new

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-08-31 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 2010/8/30 Benjamin Bentmann : > Hi, > > what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here we > go! > > Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and > Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on these new > components. > > Ove

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-08-31 Thread Arnaud Héritier
+1 Arnaud Héritier aherit...@apache.org On Aug 30, 2010, at 3:09 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here we go! > > Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and > Aether [0] and shall help to ge

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-08-31 Thread Vincent Latombe
I opened http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4786 . The test case comes directly from the Maven book (see http://www.sonatype.com/books/mhandbook/reference/ch04s04.html) 2010/8/31 Benjamin Bentmann > Vincent Latombe wrote: > > I'm getting an NPE, calling a plugin that uses ant scripts >> Caused

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-08-31 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Vincent Latombe wrote: I'm getting an NPE, calling a plugin that uses ant scripts Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.maven.script.ant.AntMojoWrapper.execute(AntMojoWrapper.java:126) at org.apache.maven.plugin.DefaultBuildPluginManager.executeMojo(DefaultBui

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-08-31 Thread Vincent Latombe
velopers List > Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2) > > Hi, > > what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here > we go! > > Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and > Aether [0] and shall help to

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-08-31 Thread Jeff Jensen
+1 (non-binding) "better, stronger, faster" :-) -Original Message- From: Benjamin Bentmann [mailto:benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu] Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 8:09 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2) Hi, what's a better s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-08-30 Thread Mark Derricutt
+1 The artifacts I was getting the NPEs on during release no longer NPE with current SNAPSHOTs and this build. -- Pull me down under... On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Benjamin Bentmann < benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu> wrote: > Hi, > > what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-08-30 Thread Oleg Gusakov
+1 20-some modules with AspectJ, built, deploy. Terracotta plugin 1.4.0 failed to execute tests with NPE in aether code [MNG-4785], worked fine in beta-2. But imho - one plugin is not a reason to stop this version, could be fixed in beta-4 On 8/30/10 6:09 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-08-30 Thread Baptiste MATHUS
+1 (non binding). Tested on a 30+ multimodule build without problem. 2010/8/30 Igor Fedorenko > +1. Both tycho and m2eclipse builds are happy. > > -- > Regards, > Igor > > > Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here we >> go!

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-08-30 Thread Igor Fedorenko
+1. Both tycho and m2eclipse builds are happy. -- Regards, Igor Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here we go! Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and Aether [0] and shall help to get some more co

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-08-30 Thread Tony Chemit
+1 Le Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:09:28 +0200, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit : > Hi, > > what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here > we go! > > Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and > Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community te

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-08-30 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
+1 Emmanuel On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Benjamin Bentmann < benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu> wrote: > Hi, > > what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here we > go! > > > Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and > Aether [0] and shall help

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-08-30 Thread Stephen Connolly
I'm seeing a regression on 3.0-beta-2 with respect to time for my work's "build most everything aggregator pom" build (mvn clean install -DskipTest) Memory seems improved: 3.0-beta-3: Final Memory: 324M/760M Total time: 14:02.778s 3.0-beta-2: Final Memory: 524M/800M Total time: 8:58.144s Nothin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-08-30 Thread Brian Fox
Plus 1. (just discovered the "plus" key on my board is broken) On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here we > go! > > Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and > Ae

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-08-30 Thread Paul Merlin
+1 (non-binding) Tested with my oss and work projects. Tested a release process using git. /Paul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-08-30 Thread Jason van Zyl
+1 On Aug 30, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here we go! > > Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and > Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on these

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-08-30 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi, what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here we go! Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on these new components. Overall, we solved 19 issues: http://jira.codeha

Re: [CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3

2010-08-28 Thread Arnaud Héritier
Not yet Arnaud On Aug 28, 2010, at 6:49 PM, Paul Benedict wrote: > With the vote canceled, I may have missed the respin. Is there a new > build available? > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For a

Re: [CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3

2010-08-28 Thread Paul Benedict
With the vote canceled, I may have missed the respin. Is there a new build available? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: [CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3

2010-08-26 Thread Mark Derricutt
If there's any further information I can give let me know. I suspect there's something to do with the dependencies in the project, as some of our artifacts released fine, but 3-4 had this NPE. 1) We use version ranges for our internal dependecies, such as [2.0.0,3.0.0) 2) We're using nexus 1.5.x

[CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3

2010-08-26 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Mark Derricutt wrote: -1 - I'm getting NullPointerExceptions with the aether in todays current nightly build when doing releases. https://gist.github.com/8ac6e71ad49cf8928549 Raised as http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4779 Thanks, I hereby cancel the vote to fix this first. Benjamin --

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3

2010-08-26 Thread Baptiste MATHUS
+1 (non-binding) 2010/8/26 Paul Merlin > > +1 > > /Paul > > Quoting Benjamin Bentmann : > > Hi, > > > > apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and > > Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on these > > new components. Overall, we solved 16 iss

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3

2010-08-26 Thread Paul Merlin
+1 /Paul Quoting Benjamin Bentmann : > Hi, > > apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and > Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on these > new components. Overall, we solved 16 issues: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proj

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3

2010-08-25 Thread Mark Derricutt
-1 - I'm getting NullPointerExceptions with the aether in todays current nightly build when doing releases. https://gist.github.com/8ac6e71ad49cf8928549 Raised as http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4779 -- Pull me down under... On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Oleg Gusakov wrote: > +1 > > 2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3

2010-08-25 Thread Oleg Gusakov
+1 20-some module project with AspectJ & Terracotta - no issues. On 8/25/10 4:36 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on these new components. Overall, we solved

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3

2010-08-25 Thread Jason van Zyl
+1 On Aug 25, 2010, at 4:36 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and > Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on these new > components. Overall, we solved 16 issues: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3

2010-08-25 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi, apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on these new components. Overall, we solved 16 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16681 There are still a cou

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-2

2010-08-10 Thread Mark Derricutt
+100 - works on one of my OSGi artifacts where beta-1 ( and last SNAPSHOTs from a week or so ago ) failed. My only issue left is the lack of -SNAPSHOTs in version ranges ( an ongoing M3 gripe that hopefully some mid-way resolution can be discovered ). -- Pull me down under... On Wed, Aug 11, 2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-2

2010-08-10 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
lukewpatterson wrote: my project never explicitly defines the project.url element in the pom [...] "The parameters 'docURL' for goal ...:generate-osgi-manifest are missing or invalid..." like I said, this could very well be the desired behavior, not sure what missing pom elements default to

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-2

2010-08-10 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Benjamin Bentmann, Jason van Zyl, Hervé Boutemy, Olivier Lamy, Daniel Kulp, Stéphane Nicoll, Arnaud Héritier, Lukas Theussl, Emmanuel Venisse, Vincent Siveton, Brian Fox, Ralph Goers +1 (non-binding): Christian Edward Gruber, E

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-2

2010-08-10 Thread lukewpatterson
noticed different behavior when running <=beta-1 and this, I'm guessing it's related to: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4615 ([regression] @required plugin parameters are not validated) the new behavior might actually be the desired behavior, not sure from the plugin's plugin.xml:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-2

2010-08-10 Thread Stephen Connolly
+1 from me, works on our tricky builds -Stephen On 7 August 2010 12:16, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 28 issues: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16090 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/se

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-2

2010-08-10 Thread Ben Tatham
+1 Works well on our complex projects too. -Ben On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 28 issues: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16090 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > > http://jira.codeha

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-2

2010-08-09 Thread Vincent Siveton
+1 Vincent Le 2010-08-09 à 14:56, Kristian Rosenvold a écrit : +1 Kristian lø., 07.08.2010 kl. 13.16 +0200, skrev Benjamin Bentmann: Hi, We solved 28 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16090 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

  1   2   3   >