[RESULT][VOTE] Maven Shared Utils 0.1, Take 2

2012-11-01 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result : +1 (binding): Benson Margulies, Mark Struberg, Oliver Lamy, Kristian Rosenvold I will promote the artifacts to the central repo. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven

Re: [VOTE] Maven Shared Utils 0.1, Take 2

2012-10-30 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 2012/10/29 Kristian Rosenvold : > Hi, > > This is the first version of maven-shared-utils, a replacement for > plexus-utils. This version has been tested > extensively with the current maven code base, so as version numbers > come "0.1" is slightly arbitrary; we > expect to add a feature or tw

Re: [VOTE] Maven Shared Utils 0.1, Take 2

2012-10-30 Thread Stephen Connolly
I think we should have both... but it may take me a while to actually get around to committing the change ;-) On 30 October 2012 10:45, Benson Margulies wrote: > Indeed, > http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/maven-project-release-procedure.html > does not mention the tag. If someone wants

Re: [VOTE] Maven Shared Utils 0.1, Take 2

2012-10-30 Thread Benson Margulies
Indeed, http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/maven-project-release-procedure.html does not mention the tag. If someone wants both the source package *and* tag, someone should edit that. On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: > The release guidelines say reference staged

Re: [VOTE] Maven Shared Utils 0.1, Take 2

2012-10-30 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
The release guidelines say reference staged zip (http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/maven-project-release-procedure.html), so if we decide to switch we should update the guideline. I'd personally prefer the scm url, but I just followed the guide ;) Kristian 2012/10/30 Stephen Connolly :

Re: [VOTE] Maven Shared Utils 0.1, Take 2

2012-10-30 Thread Stephen Connolly
isn't the vote supposed to include the SCM tag details? On 29 October 2012 14:39, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: > Hi, > > This is the first version of maven-shared-utils, a replacement for > plexus-utils. This version has been tested > extensively with the current maven code base, so as version numbe

Re: [VOTE] Maven Shared Utils 0.1

2012-10-29 Thread Brett Porter
On 29/10/2012, at 11:51 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > I have two further objections to this. > > 1: there are files that do not comply with the requirements for IP > notices: readme.md and findbugs-exclude.xml. > > I think that, as a PMC, we should impose more or less the same > standards on f

Re: [VOTE] Maven Shared Utils 0.1, Take 2

2012-10-29 Thread Mark Struberg
+1 LieGrue, strub - Original Message - > From: Kristian Rosenvold > To: Maven Developers List > Cc: > Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 3:39 PM > Subject: [VOTE] Maven Shared Utils 0.1, Take 2 > > Hi, > > This is the first version of maven-shared-utils,

Markdow issue [was Re: [VOTE] Maven Shared Utils 0.1, Take 2 ]

2012-10-29 Thread Olivier Lamy
Changing subject to not pollute vote thread :-) yup works fine here too :-) http://helix.incubator.apache.org sources https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-helix.git;a=summary 2012/10/29 Benson Margulies : > strange; I have a working markdown index on a project at work. when I > get

Re: [VOTE] Maven Shared Utils 0.1, Take 2

2012-10-29 Thread Benson Margulies
strange; I have a working markdown index on a project at work. when I get home I will send details. On Oct 29, 2012, at 11:19 AM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: > 2012/10/29 Benson Margulies : >> By the way, does markdown really do XML comments :-) > > Google said it does - I haven't really tested mu

Re: [VOTE] Maven Shared Utils 0.1, Take 2

2012-10-29 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
2012/10/29 Benson Margulies : > By the way, does markdown really do XML comments :-) Google said it does - I haven't really tested much more than that ;) An interesting bug I just came across is that markdown/index.md does not work the way it's supposed to; it seems like it has to be apt/index.ap

Re: [VOTE] Maven Shared Utils 0.1, Take 2

2012-10-29 Thread Benson Margulies
+1, binding, and thanks very much. By the way, does markdown really do XML comments :-) On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: > Hi, > > This is the first version of maven-shared-utils, a replacement for > plexus-utils. This version has been tested > extensively with the cu

[VOTE] Maven Shared Utils 0.1, Take 2

2012-10-29 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Hi, This is the first version of maven-shared-utils, a replacement for plexus-utils. This version has been tested extensively with the current maven code base, so as version numbers come "0.1" is slightly arbitrary; we expect to add a feature or two (and a relase or two) before calling it 1.0. He

[Cancelled] [VOTE] Maven Shared Utils 0.1

2012-10-29 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
New vote coming up in 20 seconds. 2012/10/29 Benson Margulies : > I have two further objections to this. > > 1: there are files that do not comply with the requirements for IP > notices: readme.md and findbugs-exclude.xml. > > I think that, as a PMC, we should impose more or less the same > stan

Re: [VOTE] Maven Shared Utils 0.1

2012-10-29 Thread Benson Margulies
I have two further objections to this. 1: there are files that do not comply with the requirements for IP notices: readme.md and findbugs-exclude.xml. I think that, as a PMC, we should impose more or less the same standards on first releases of new components that the incubator imposes on podling

Re: [VOTE] Maven Shared Utils 0.1

2012-10-29 Thread Benson Margulies
This vote email does not have a specific link to the source archive. I won't vote -1 (in fact, I won't vote until I look it over, but that's supposed to be required). On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 3:35 AM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: > Hi, > > This is the first version of maven-shared-utils, a replacemen