Looks like we're a go. I'll push the release out tomorrow.
On 4-Jan-09, at 7:32 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
This is really to get the ball rolling for Maven 3.x. While I have
some gracious guinea pigs who are arduously pummeling this code base
I wouldn't recommend anyone use this in produ
On 5-Jan-09, at 7:54 PM, Paul Benedict wrote:
Is there a site distribution or a temporary location where the maven 3
site can be viewed? I find it difficult to try anything new without
some help.
None of the new features are available for public use yet. We're
focusing on making it a drop
Is there a site distribution or a temporary location where the maven 3
site can be viewed? I find it difficult to try anything new without
some help.
PS: Anyone the owner of www.maven-3.com ?
Paul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-u
It's probably a general plugin API problem which is not surprising.
So we'll schedule that into alpha-2 or alpha-3.
On 5-Jan-09, at 1:38 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hi,
+0 (as all projects which use an old version of plexus-maven-plugin
cannot build).
IMHO this issue must be in the release note.
Hi,
+0 (as all projects which use an old version of plexus-maven-plugin
cannot build).
IMHO this issue must be in the release note.
But I have tested successfully with some company builds.
--
Olivier
PS : jira issue http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3960
2009/1/5 Jason van Zyl :
> Hi,
>
> This
+1 lets get the ball rolling :)
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>> Put it in JIRA for alpha-2. Either this should come out or we update the
>> version.
>>
>> On 5
+1
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Put it in JIRA for alpha-2. Either this should come out or we update the
> version.
>
> On 5-Jan-09, at 12:49 PM, Vincent Siveton wrote:
>
>> +0
>>
>> Since the model adds new field (ActivationCustom), I think the xsd
>> version should be
Put it in JIRA for alpha-2. Either this should come out or we update
the version.
On 5-Jan-09, at 12:49 PM, Vincent Siveton wrote:
+0
Since the model adds new field (ActivationCustom), I think the xsd
version should be 4.0.1 or 5.0.
Cheers,
Vincent
2009/1/4 Jason van Zyl :
Hi,
This is r
+0
Since the model adds new field (ActivationCustom), I think the xsd
version should be 4.0.1 or 5.0.
Cheers,
Vincent
2009/1/4 Jason van Zyl :
> Hi,
>
> This is really to get the ball rolling for Maven 3.x. While I have some
> gracious guinea pigs who are arduously pummeling this code base I wo
+1
Arnaud
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is really to get the ball rolling for Maven 3.x. While I have some
> gracious guinea pigs who are arduously pummeling this code base I wouldn't
> recommend anyone use this in production. If you want to try it and give
+1
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
This is really to get the ball rolling for Maven 3.x. While I have some
gracious guinea pigs who are arduously pummeling this code base I
wouldn't recommend anyone use this in production. If you want to try it
and give feedback that's great, but we have a lot of w
+1
Stéphane
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is really to get the ball rolling for Maven 3.x. While I have some
> gracious guinea pigs who are arduously pummeling this code base I wouldn't
> recommend anyone use this in production. If you want to try it and gi
+1
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
This is really to get the ball rolling for Maven 3.x. While I have some
gracious guinea pigs who are arduously pummeling this code base I
wouldn't recommend anyone use this in production. If you want to try it
and give feedback that's great, but we have a lot of w
+1
- Fabrice
belling...@apache.org
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is really to get the ball rolling for Maven 3.x. While I have some
> gracious guinea pigs who are arduously pummeling this code base I wouldn't
> recommend anyone use this in production. If
+1
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is really to get the ball rolling for Maven 3.x. While I have some
> gracious guinea pigs who are arduously pummeling this code base I wouldn't
> recommend anyone use this in production. If you want to try it and give
> feedb
+1
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
This is really to get the ball rolling for Maven 3.x. While I have
some gracious guinea pigs who are arduously pummeling this code base I
wouldn't recommend anyone use this in production. If you want to try
it and give feedback that's great, but we have a lot of w
On 4-Jan-09, at 11:49 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
On Jan 4, 2009, at 4:32 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
We are trying extremely hard to make everything accessible by
producing tons of ITs, a specification for POM construction and
builds coming off the grid at a very high frequency. I hope that
On Jan 4, 2009, at 4:32 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
We are trying extremely hard to make everything accessible by
producing tons of ITs, a specification for POM construction and
builds coming off the grid at a very high frequency. I hope that
fairly soon into the alpha cycle we can attract
+1
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:jvan...@sonatype.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2009 7:32 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Maven 3.0-alpha-1
Hi,
This is really to get the ball rolling for Maven 3.x. While I have
some gracious guinea pigs who are
+1 :)
~t~
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is really to get the ball rolling for Maven 3.x. While I have some
> gracious guinea pigs who are arduously pummeling this code base I wouldn't
> recommend anyone use this in production. If you want to try it and give
Hi,
This is really to get the ball rolling for Maven 3.x. While I have
some gracious guinea pigs who are arduously pummeling this code base I
wouldn't recommend anyone use this in production. If you want to try
it and give feedback that's great, but we have a lot of work we know
ourselves
21 matches
Mail list logo
