Results:
Binding +11: Brian, Wendy, Arnaud, Brett, Vincent, Lukas, Stepane,
Jason, Jesse, John, Olivier
-Original Message-
From: Brian E. Fox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 12:42 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Maven 2.0.9
Time to vote on the final
for the bug on javadoc, those projects are using 2.3.
I couldn't test 2.4 on them.
I have some projects on 2.4 but they have many less code.
Arnaud
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What version of the javadoc plugin? The only thing I can think it'd be
> r
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 8:09 AM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.0.9
>
>
>
> Just to let you know, I made more tests I noticed two problems :
> - I have several javadocs errors I hadn't before with 2.0.7 on o
Did you check if these occur in 2.0.8?
-Original Message-
From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 8:09 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.0.9
Just to let you know, I made more tests I noticed two
What version of the javadoc plugin? The only thing I can think it'd be
related to is the change to the lifecycle forking.
- Brett
On 09/04/2008, at 10:09 PM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
Just to let you know, I made more tests I noticed two problems :
- I have several javadocs errors I hadn't befo
Just to let you know, I made more tests I noticed two problems :
- I have several javadocs errors I hadn't before with 2.0.7 on our
continuous integration server. Those errors are related to the jdk :
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6442982
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bu
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Time to vote on the final Maven 2.0.9 Release. We went through 8 Release
> Candidates and fixed all know regressions from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9 during
> that time. Note that there were no source changes between RC8 and this
> fin
On 08/04/2008, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Time to vote on the final Maven 2.0.9 Release. We went through 8 Release
> Candidates and fixed all know regressions from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9 during
> that time. Note that there were no source changes between RC8 and this
> final build.
+1 (no
+1
I've been using RC7 since it was uploaded (and some before that). I've
just checked the zip file from below is working as expected and
contains the correct license and notice files. I reviewed the commits
between 2.0.8 and 2.0.9 earlier.
Cheers,
Brett
On 08/04/2008, at 2:42 AM, Brian
+1
Vincent
2008/4/7, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Time to vote on the final Maven 2.0.9 Release. We went through 8 Release
> Candidates and fixed all know regressions from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9 during
> that time. Note that there were no source changes between RC8 and this
> final build.
>
>
>
+1
Great work, thanks everyone!
-Lukas
Brian E. Fox wrote:
Time to vote on the final Maven 2.0.9 Release. We went through 8 Release
Candidates and fixed all know regressions from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9 during
that time. Note that there were no source changes between RC8 and this
final build.
Rel
+1
Stéphane
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Time to vote on the final Maven 2.0.9 Release. We went through 8 Release
> Candidates and fixed all know regressions from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9 during
> that time. Note that there were no source changes between RC8 a
Sorry, I forgot to update my M2_HOME. Release version is ok, there is no
issue.
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Bouiaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have downloaded apache-maven-2.0.9-bin.zip and mvn -v still return Maven
> version: 2.0.9-*RC8*.
>
> Do you observe the same issue ?
>
>
>
Hi,
I have downloaded apache-maven-2.0.9-bin.zip and mvn -v still return Maven
version: 2.0.9-*RC8*.
Do you observe the same issue ?
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> --
> Olivier
>
> 2008/4/7, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Time to vote on
+1
--
Olivier
2008/4/7, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Time to vote on the final Maven 2.0.9 Release. We went through 8 Release
> Candidates and fixed all know regressions from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9 during
> that time. Note that there were no source changes between RC8 and this
> final build.
>
+1
On 7-Apr-08, at 9:42 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
Time to vote on the final Maven 2.0.9 Release. We went through 8
Release
Candidates and fixed all know regressions from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9 during
that time. Note that there were no source changes between RC8 and this
final build.
Release is staged
+1 looks good to me!
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 6:21 PM, James William Dumay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> +1
>
> This release is looking really good - thanks to everyone who made this
> release possible.
>
> James
>
> On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 12:42 -0400, Brian E. Fox wrote:
> > Time to vote on the fina
+1
This release is looking really good - thanks to everyone who made this
release possible.
James
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 12:42 -0400, Brian E. Fox wrote:
> Time to vote on the final Maven 2.0.9 Release. We went through 8 Release
> Candidates and fixed all know regressions from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9 dur
+1, works fine for me.
Rahul
Brian E. Fox wrote:
Time to vote on the final Maven 2.0.9 Release. We went through 8 Release
Candidates and fixed all know regressions from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9 during
that time. Note that there were no source changes between RC8 and this
final build.
Release is stag
+1
Hervé
Le lundi 07 avril 2008, Brian E. Fox a écrit :
> Time to vote on the final Maven 2.0.9 Release. We went through 8 Release
> Candidates and fixed all know regressions from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9 during
> that time. Note that there were no source changes between RC8 and this
> final build.
>
>
>
>
t work, in fact I believe the pom won't parse. This is something
> > we'll have to note in the release notes and we may want to prohibit
> > these from going into central.
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Arnaud HERITIER [m
in the release notes and we may want to prohibit
> these from going into central.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 1:15 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.0.9
>
+1
-john
On Apr 7, 2008, at 12:42 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
Time to vote on the final Maven 2.0.9 Release. We went through 8
Release
Candidates and fixed all know regressions from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9 during
that time. Note that there were no source changes between RC8 and this
final build.
Relea
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, Brian E. Fox wrote:
Forgot to mention that we had no problems with the latest RC - which was
running all builds (including site-gen with a lot of plugins) on our CI
server.
The beta-6 of site plugin discovered an invalid site.xml which had passed
before - but this is typi
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, Brian E. Fox wrote:
Time to vote on the final Maven 2.0.9 Release. We went through 8 Release
Candidates and fixed all know regressions from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9 during
that time. Note that there were no source changes between RC8 and this
final build.
Big +1 - both on the actual
+1
Brian E. Fox wrote:
Time to vote on the final Maven 2.0.9 Release. We went through 8 Release
Candidates and fixed all know regressions from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9 during
that time. Note that there were no source changes between RC8 and this
final build.
Release is staged at:
http://people.apach
+1 It works fine on archetype plugin build.
Raphaël
2008/4/7, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Time to vote on the final Maven 2.0.9 Release. We went through 8 Release
> Candidates and fixed all know regressions from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9 during
> that time. Note that there were no source changes b
+1
2008/4/7, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> +1
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Apr 7, 2008, at 11:42 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
>
> Time to vote on the final Maven 2.0.9 Release. We went through 8 Release
> > Candidates and fixed all know regressions from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9 during
> > that time. Note that th
+1
--jason
On Apr 7, 2008, at 11:42 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
Time to vote on the final Maven 2.0.9 Release. We went through 8
Release
Candidates and fixed all know regressions from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9 during
that time. Note that there were no source changes between RC8 and this
final build.
Re
15 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.0.9
Hi,
Something I didn't understand. What will happen with MNG-3220 and
maven version < 2.0.9. How will they do with the new scope ?
Arnaud
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Time
Hi,
Something I didn't understand. What will happen with MNG-3220 and
maven version < 2.0.9. How will they do with the new scope ?
Arnaud
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Time to vote on the final Maven 2.0.9 Release. We went through 8 Release
> Candid
Just built my projects with this fresh 2.0.9, and everything went fine, so
here's my +1
Thanks Brian!
Cheers
--
Fabrice
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Time to vote on the final Maven 2.0.9 Release. We went through 8 Release
> C
Time to vote on the final Maven 2.0.9 Release. We went through 8 Release
Candidates and fixed all know regressions from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9 during
that time. Note that there were no source changes between RC8 and this
final build.
Release is staged at:
http://people.apache.org/~brianf/stage-2.0.9
33 matches
Mail list logo
