I vote for B.
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Hi
>
> Recent discussions about the Checkstyle Plugin has raised the question
> of requiring Java 5 in Maven Plugins.
>
> We will IIUC require Java 5 for Maven 2.2. So when do we start using it
> in our plugins?
>
> [A] We start using it across the board f
+1 for [B].
This is what I had to do for the Findbugs plugin since Findbugs relies
on Java 5 since . We are still able to use it against Java 1.3 or 1.4
generated code.
Regards,
Garvin LeClaire
garvin.lecla...@gmail.com
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi
Recent discussions about the Checksty
t Porter
> An: Maven Developers List
> Gesendet: Samstag, den 16. Mai 2009, 03:12:56 Uhr
> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Java 5 and Maven Plugins
>
>
> On 16/05/2009, at 5:06 AM, Stephane Nicoll wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Benjamin Bentmann <
> > benja
On 16/05/2009, at 5:06 AM, Stephane Nicoll wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Benjamin Bentmann <
benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu> wrote:
Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Fri May 15 2009 12:18:59 pm Brian Fox wrote:
I don't think we should go out of our way yet to convert
everything to
java5, preser
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Benjamin Bentmann <
benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu> wrote:
> Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> On Fri May 15 2009 12:18:59 pm Brian Fox wrote:
>>
>>> I don't think we should go out of our way yet to convert everything to
>>> java5, preserving 1.4 compatibility (essentially 2.0/2.
Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Fri May 15 2009 12:18:59 pm Brian Fox wrote:
I don't think we should go out of our way yet to convert everything to
java5, preserving 1.4 compatibility (essentially 2.0/2.1 compatibility)
should be considered. However if there's a reason, like the checkstyle
update requies
On Fri May 15 2009 12:18:59 pm Brian Fox wrote:
> I don't think we should go out of our way yet to convert everything to
> java5, preserving 1.4 compatibility (essentially 2.0/2.1 compatibility)
> should be considered. However if there's a reason, like the checkstyle
> update requies java 5, then w
I don't think we should go out of our way yet to convert everything to
java5, preserving 1.4 compatibility (essentially 2.0/2.1 compatibility)
should be considered. However if there's a reason, like the checkstyle
update requies java 5, then we should do it and set a prerequisite of maven
2.2.0.
O
I myself have been very conservative about Java updates because I still have
to support Java 1.3 applications. I learned to use Maven with JDK6 and
target 1.3 environment.
for this reason I'm +1 with [A] or [B] (depending on the status of SNAPSHOT
plugins that in some cas include major fix compared
Hi
Recent discussions about the Checkstyle Plugin has raised the question
of requiring Java 5 in Maven Plugins.
We will IIUC require Java 5 for Maven 2.2. So when do we start using it
in our plugins?
[A] We start using it across the board for the next release of every
plugin that wants to use Ja
10 matches
Mail list logo
