Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 3)

2014-01-08 Thread Baptiste Mathus
+1, non-binding. PS : FTR, I suppose we're talking about the fa42b42693571297b323f474f9228ce99ffaf662 git sha1 tag. 2014/1/8 Robert Scholte > +1 (binding) > > Robert > > Op Tue, 07 Jan 2014 19:22:38 +0100 schreef domi : > > > Hi, >> >> We fixed 11 issues. The new feature is the jgit provide

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 3)

2014-01-08 Thread Robert Scholte
+1 (binding) Robert Op Tue, 07 Jan 2014 19:22:38 +0100 schreef domi : Hi, We fixed 11 issues. The new feature is the jgit provider (based on jgit). Details: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10527&version=18783 Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/conten

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 3)

2014-01-08 Thread Stephen Connolly
Oh, before I forget... the take 2 SCM tag was pushed to ASF git servers, so perhaps we should push the fa42b42 tag with a distinguishing tag name. Github seems to be smart enough to pick up that the tag changed: https://github.com/apache/maven-scm/tree/maven-scm-1.9 but others who checked out from

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 3)

2014-01-08 Thread Stephen Connolly
Tests performed by me: * Source release SHA1 sum matches in email => PASS * RAT report is same or better than previous release => 0 files, so PASS * Source bundle builds successfully => PASS These are all the tests I have time to run right now, but on this basis I am happy to vote +1 (binding)

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 3)

2014-01-07 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
+1 Regards, Hervé Le mardi 7 janvier 2014 19:22:38 domi a écrit : > Hi, > > We fixed 11 issues. The new feature is the jgit provider (based on jgit). > Details: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10527&version=187 > 83 > > Staging repository: > https://repository.apac

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 3)

2014-01-07 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 On 8 January 2014 05:22, domi wrote: > Hi, > > We fixed 11 issues. The new feature is the jgit provider (based on jgit). > Details: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10527&version=18783 > > Staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/mave

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2014-01-07 Thread Andreas Gudian
For the last surefire releases, I just created a tar.gz from the local site, uploaded it to people.a.o via SCP and did the commit from there. Was a matter of minutes instead of hours. It's cumbersome, though... A pretty large part of the files is the Javadoc. And I don't know about you guys, but I

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 3)

2014-01-07 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 2014/1/7 domi > Hi, > > We fixed 11 issues. The new feature is the jgit provider (based on jgit). > Details: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10527&version=18783 > > Staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-009/ > > Staged s

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2014-01-07 Thread Stephen Connolly
Doxia was at least 1.5hr for me, so 2h wouldn't surprise me at all. On Tuesday, 7 January 2014, Dominik Bartholdi wrote: > Thanks Oliver! > It just hanged for more then two hours, then I just stopped it - sorry if > this was too short, I did not expect it to take as long. > /Domi > > On 07.01.201

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2014-01-07 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
Thanks Oliver! It just hanged for more then two hours, then I just stopped it - sorry if this was too short, I did not expect it to take as long. /Domi On 07.01.2014, at 08:28, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > in the short term, Olivier did the publication: job done > > but let's understand what "does n

[VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 3)

2014-01-07 Thread domi
Hi, We fixed 11 issues. The new feature is the jgit provider (based on jgit). Details: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10527&version=18783 Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-009/ Staged site: http://maven.apache.org/scm-archive

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2014-01-06 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
IMHO the latest strategy is good for main site content: ie we can now publish a modification in plugins list, for example, in a few minutes, with a site being build in a consistent manner (no more anybody frightened to break the site because something in his conf is different) but for component

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2014-01-06 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
in the short term, Olivier did the publication: job done but let's understand what "does not work": did you get a failure? Or only you stopped the publication process after some (long) time? Regards, Hervé Le mardi 7 janvier 2014 05:52:16 Dominik Bartholdi a écrit : > Hi Oliver, > > I tried o

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2014-01-06 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
If you're in europe you should probably set the us svn server in your hosts file; someone here will give you the magic settings :) I tend to cross my fingers and let site publication run overnight. All the different site publication strategies have been flawed in one way or another, this latest st

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2014-01-06 Thread Olivier Lamy
done: http://maven.apache.org/scm-archives/scm-LATEST/ On 7 January 2014 15:52, Dominik Bartholdi wrote: > Hi Oliver, > > I tried over and over again - it just does not work out on my Mac - I’m not > able to publish the Documentation. > Would be great if you could do it - everything else (the a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2014-01-06 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
Hi Oliver, I tried over and over again - it just does not work out on my Mac - I’m not able to publish the Documentation. Would be great if you could do it - everything else (the artifacts) are already done (https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-009/). thanks Domi On 07.01.2

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2014-01-06 Thread Olivier Lamy
I don't know if you stop trying this but if needed I can do it for you, I use an external ci server to not block my laptop and be able to continue various music, videos etc... Just let me know. On 7 January 2014 08:23, Dominik Bartholdi wrote: > My next problem… > does any one have any idea? > Pu

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2014-01-06 Thread Robert Scholte
Just be patient, it is a huge commit. All changes to the documentation of the whole(!) SCM site are committed at once. Robert Op Mon, 06 Jan 2014 22:23:59 +0100 schreef Dominik Bartholdi : My next problem… does any one have any idea? Publishing the page always hangs here (more then 30 Mi

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2014-01-06 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
My next problem… does any one have any idea? Publishing the page always hangs here (more then 30 Minutes, actually never ends...): mvn scm-publish:publish-scm -Dusername=imod -Dpassword=x …. [INFO] [INFO] Building Maven

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2014-01-06 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
Thanks, I was searching for it on the sonatype OSS Nexus - now I can see it! Lets see how far I get now :) Domi On 06.01.2014, at 19:56, Benson Margulies wrote: > Are you imod? If so, the repo is sitting there. I can close it for > you, but you should try logging in and closing it for yourself.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2014-01-06 Thread Benson Margulies
Are you imod? If so, the repo is sitting there. I can close it for you, but you should try logging in and closing it for yourself. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h..

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2014-01-06 Thread Benson Margulies
Did you log into repository.apache.org? On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Dominik Bartholdi wrote: > > Hey guys, > I finally started the release of scm-1.9 - I was able to stage the artifacts, > but now , following this process > http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html#close-sta

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2014-01-06 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
Hey guys, I finally started the release of scm-1.9 - I was able to stage the artifacts, but now , following this process http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html#close-stage I would have to close the staging repo (as described here https://docs.sonatype.org/display/Repository/C

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2014-01-03 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
I was hopping for a drysuite :) On 03.01.2014, at 11:49, Stephen Connolly wrote: > And better to get your feet wet early after all ;-) > > > On 3 January 2014 10:43, Robert Scholte wrote: > >> Domi, you knew that day would come sooner or later, right? ;) >> >> >> Op Fri, 03 Jan 2014 08:58

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2014-01-03 Thread Stephen Connolly
And better to get your feet wet early after all ;-) On 3 January 2014 10:43, Robert Scholte wrote: > Domi, you knew that day would come sooner or later, right? ;) > > > Op Fri, 03 Jan 2014 08:58:59 +0100 schreef Dominik Bartholdi < > d...@fortysix.ch>: > > > Thanks Robert, >> I’ll give it a go

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2014-01-03 Thread Robert Scholte
Domi, you knew that day would come sooner or later, right? ;) Op Fri, 03 Jan 2014 08:58:59 +0100 schreef Dominik Bartholdi : Thanks Robert, I’ll give it a go, but its gona be my first “official maven plugin release”, so please be patient :) /Domi On 30.12.2013, at 13:07, Robert Scholte

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2014-01-03 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
Thanks Robert, I’ll give it a go, but its gona be my first “official maven plugin release”, so please be patient :) /Domi On 30.12.2013, at 13:07, Robert Scholte wrote: > Personally I think it is important that the source-releases.zip can at least > be built somewhere. The more the better of

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-30 Thread Robert Scholte
Personally I think it is important that the source-releases.zip can at least be built somewhere. The more the better of course. If Windows isn't the right OS, then that's fine for me. @Domi, if nobody sees any blockers, could you start a take 3? thanks, Robert Op Fri, 27 Dec 2013 10:00:07

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-27 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
Hi Robert, I had a go too, on Mac everything is OK - but on Win with SVN 1.8.5 the maven-scm-plugin failed to create the repository :( regards Domi On 24.12.2013, at 22:26, Robert Scholte wrote: > Hi, > > I've fixed SCM-737, which means that the source-releases.zip should match all > the f

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-24 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi, I've fixed SCM-737, which means that the source-releases.zip should match all the files project files again. If I'm correct this means that the reason for the -1 vote has been solved. However, on my Windows machine I don't get the test for the maven-scm-plugin to succeed. The svnadmin

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-19 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I usually ignore threads when they degenerate into procedural discussions and I'll guarantee supress any voting thread where the first thing that comes out is a -1; I've got coding to do. Sorry for being an idiot, I'm usually quite good at keeping my foot out of my mouth. Can't always get it right

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-19 Thread Stephen Connolly
On Thursday, 19 December 2013, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: > I think all the crap/trolling in the release threads has gone way too far, > it's just not fun any more. > > I can only request that PMC members chip in *before* the the vote to > /improve/ technical problems with a release > rather than s

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-19 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I think all the crap/trolling in the release threads has gone way too far, it's just not fun any more. I can only request that PMC members chip in *before* the the vote to /improve/ technical problems with a release rather than spending a ton of energy documenting their -1 *after* the release is s

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-19 Thread Robert Scholte
Stephens remarks are valid, let me try to pick this up in the next couple of weeks. Robert Op Thu, 19 Dec 2013 18:31:13 +0100 schreef Dominik Bartholdi : Thanks Oliver, its a bit disappointing, as this at the end (at least for me) also means the other scm components are not maintainable

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-19 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
Thanks Oliver, its a bit disappointing, as this at the end (at least for me) also means the other scm components are not maintainable anymore… Taking this into account, then its probably a better idea to not have this under the apache umbrella anyway. Where do you think we should release it from?

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-15 Thread Olivier Lamy
So that's 2 weeks now. I presume I can say the vote failed. I will delete the tag and the staging repo. If someone else want to act RM let's go. perso I'm tired @Domi I'm sorry I believed if was a good idea to have the module jgit here (but cvs looks to me more important :P ). Anyway we can re

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-04 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
OK, then you have my +1 /Domi On 03.12.2013, at 08:20, Olivier Lamy wrote: > No worries. > IMHO it's not the problem. Issue is cvs-commons module. > > -- > Olivier > On Dec 3, 2013 3:34 PM, "Dominik Bartholdi" wrote: > >> Sorry guys, during the week I’m usually a bit short in time… >> But is

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-02 Thread Olivier Lamy
No worries. IMHO it's not the problem. Issue is cvs-commons module. -- Olivier On Dec 3, 2013 3:34 PM, "Dominik Bartholdi" wrote: > Sorry guys, during the week I’m usually a bit short in time… > But is ist possible, that my commit > d1f102e5223e5fe0f852e1a5becb497f0e860d6a is actually causing th

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-02 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
Sorry guys, during the week I’m usually a bit short in time… But is ist possible, that my commit d1f102e5223e5fe0f852e1a5becb497f0e860d6a is actually causing this issue? Its an exclude of some CVS stuff I had in my untracked list all the time when doing a full build... regards Domi On 03.12.201

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-02 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-737 created Le mardi 3 décembre 2013 03:05:17 Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit : > +1 > > need to find a workaround for CVS provider unit tests later > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le lundi 2 décembre 2013 19:38:41 Olivier Lamy a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > We fixed 11 issues

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-02 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
+1 need to find a workaround for CVS provider unit tests later Regards, Hervé Le lundi 2 décembre 2013 19:38:41 Olivier Lamy a écrit : > Hi, > > We fixed 11 issues. The new feature is the jgit provider (based on jgit). > Details: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=105

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-02 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
now that: 1. the problem is known 2. its impact estimated low: only tests for CVS provider IMHO, we can afford releasing as is and creating a Jira issue to find a better solution later Regards, Hervé Le mardi 3 décembre 2013 12:47:55 Olivier Lamy a écrit : > On 3 December 2013 11:18, Stephen

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-02 Thread Benson Margulies
I dunno, change the version to 2.0 and remove support for CVS? On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > On 3 December 2013 12:52, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: >> Am 03.12.2013, 02:47 Uhr, schrieb Olivier Lamy : >> >>> For some reasons I don't understand yet why defaultExclude=false >>> do

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-02 Thread Olivier Lamy
On 3 December 2013 12:52, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > Am 03.12.2013, 02:47 Uhr, schrieb Olivier Lamy : > >> For some reasons I don't understand yet why defaultExclude=false >> doesn't work for CVS directories. > > > Uh, isnt that supposed to be "yes" to enable the exclusion of default > patterns? no

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-02 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
Am 03.12.2013, 02:47 Uhr, schrieb Olivier Lamy : For some reasons I don't understand yet why defaultExclude=false doesn't work for CVS directories. Uh, isnt that supposed to be "yes" to enable the exclusion of default patterns? Gruss Bernd --

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-02 Thread Olivier Lamy
On 3 December 2013 11:18, Stephen Connolly wrote: > On Monday, 2 December 2013, Olivier Lamy wrote: > >> On 2 December 2013 22:34, Stephen Connolly >> > wrote: >> > -1, for the following reasons >> > >> > * No checksum of the source bundle in the email, per current vote email >> > format: FTR SHA1

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-02 Thread Stephen Connolly
On Monday, 2 December 2013, Olivier Lamy wrote: > On 2 December 2013 22:34, Stephen Connolly > > wrote: > > -1, for the following reasons > > > > * No checksum of the source bundle in the email, per current vote email > > format: FTR SHA1 of bundle I checked is > > a0fdae255eebc2dfbd0f973073f7c972

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-02 Thread Olivier Lamy
On 2 December 2013 22:34, Stephen Connolly wrote: > -1, for the following reasons > > * No checksum of the source bundle in the email, per current vote email > format: FTR SHA1 of bundle I checked is > a0fdae255eebc2dfbd0f973073f7c97284b5f9f9. > > * The source bundle does not build. > > If I look

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-02 Thread Stephen Connolly
-1, for the following reasons * No checksum of the source bundle in the email, per current vote email format: FTR SHA1 of bundle I checked is a0fdae255eebc2dfbd0f973073f7c97284b5f9f9. * The source bundle does not build. If I look at the difference between the tag and the source bundle I see the

[VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-02 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, We fixed 11 issues. The new feature is the jgit provider (based on jgit). Details: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10527&version=18783 Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-002/ Staged site: http://maven.apache.org/scm-archive

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9

2013-11-30 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
Thanks Robert, thats really great news!!! On 25.11.2013, at 22:41, Robert Scholte wrote: > Yes indeed, I have GitTortoise installed. > You may call it good news, but I've also started the Process Explorer (to > keep track of the problematic process) and now I've been able to run the > project

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9

2013-11-27 Thread Olivier Lamy
On Nov 26, 2013 8:41 AM, "Robert Scholte" wrote: > > Yes indeed, I have GitTortoise installed. > You may call it good news, but I've also started the Process Explorer (to keep track of the problematic process) and now I've been able to run the project three times in a row without failures. > So it

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9

2013-11-25 Thread Robert Scholte
Yes indeed, I have GitTortoise installed. You may call it good news, but I've also started the Process Explorer (to keep track of the problematic process) and now I've been able to run the project three times in a row without failures. So it's a bit frustrating that the result is inconsistent

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9

2013-11-25 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
I sometimes have the problem that the explorer extension tgitcache from Tortoise keeps handles open in git directories. Maybe your test machine has that installed? > Am 25.11.2013 um 19:46 schrieb "Robert Scholte" : > > I have an appointment tonight, will try it afterwards or tomorrow with a >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9

2013-11-25 Thread Robert Scholte
I have an appointment tonight, will try it afterwards or tomorrow with a clean checkout. Robert Op Mon, 25 Nov 2013 19:43:58 +0100 schreef Dominik Bartholdi : Thats really disappointing, specially as I have finally managed to get hold on a windows PC and I just run everything 10times in

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9

2013-11-25 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
Thats really disappointing, specially as I have finally managed to get hold on a windows PC and I just run everything 10times in row without any issues… :( I’m pretty much out of ideas :( If anyone has any hand he can share, that would be great! I tried with: Windows 7, Java 1.6.0_17-b04, maven 3.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9

2013-11-24 Thread Robert Scholte
Hmm, maybe I cheered too early. A second run gave me 6 errors. Still unsure what is keeping a lock of the files. Both 'mvn clean' and 'rmdir /S target' fail. F:\java-workspace\apache-maven-scm\maven-scm\maven-scm-providers\maven-scm-provi ders-git\maven-scm-provider-jgit>rmdir /S target target. W

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9

2013-11-24 Thread Robert Scholte
We're getting closer, only one error left: Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.926 sec <<< FA ILURE! - in org.apache.maven.scm.provider.git.jgit.command.tag.JGitTagCommandTck Test testTagCommandTest(org.apache.maven.scm.provider.git.jgit.command.tag.JGitTagCom m

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9

2013-11-24 Thread Dominik Bartholdi
Hi everyone, I think I solved all the issues we had on windows with the jgit-provider @Robert can you have another try now? The build https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-scm/ currently fails, but this is related to an issue with the upload to the snapshot repository at https://repository.apache.o

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9

2013-10-29 Thread Olivier Lamy
for the record vote cancel. On 29 October 2013 17:20, Domi wrote: > I was pointed to Matthias Sohn (jgit commiter) let's see if he has an idea, > before we do a release of this. > His first thought was the WindowCache.reconfigure() - but Robert already > fixed that. > /Domi > >> Am 28.10.2013

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9

2013-10-28 Thread Domi
I was pointed to Matthias Sohn (jgit commiter) let's see if he has an idea, before we do a release of this. His first thought was the WindowCache.reconfigure() - but Robert already fixed that. /Domi > Am 28.10.2013 um 20:51 schrieb "Robert Scholte" : > > @Kristian: Brilliant data! > > @Dennis:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9

2013-10-28 Thread Robert Scholte
@Kristian: Brilliant data! @Dennis: the statistics have changed[1]. I managed to fix it a bit, but as Kristian mentioned: some parts are out of reach and can't be closed by our code (let's avoid reflection!). I believe that in this case the Windows behavior is the preferred one: if you op

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9

2013-10-28 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I just filed https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=420502 The bug seems to affect "most" jgit operations and is not limited to one single call/feature. I looked at the jgit codebase and to my understanding the file handles in question seem to be lacking a consistent deallocation strategy (

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9

2013-10-28 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Thanks a lot Kristian! Do I understand you correctly that the leak is in the jgit Checkout command? If so, there are probably more leaks in there since 9 of our tests fail, each testing a different command. Some tests do succeed though. So how do we proceed with this? Submit patches for jgit? Rel

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9

2013-10-28 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Finding this kind of leaks with my graciously provided OSS license of YJP is like stealing candy from children export MAVEN_OPTS="-Xms512m -Xmx2084m -XX:MaxPermSize=512m -agentpath:C:/java/yjp-12.0.6/bin/win64/yjpagent.dll=onexit=snapshot" c:/java/apache-maven-3.1.1/bin/mvn $@ Run test with forkM

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9

2013-10-27 Thread Olivier Lamy
Windauze one of the biggest pain of my life... So few people trying to fix that (perso I don't have any windauze env). And it looks no success. So what else now? Not releasing that until we get a fix from jgit. AFAICS the issue is because after testing we try to delete the local clone. Is it reall

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9

2013-10-26 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi Domi, I've given the tests another spin, but still with the same results. I found this thread: http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/jgit-dev/msg01959.html It seems to expose the same kind of problem. I've tried a couple of things, but still couldn't delete during the test. Maybe it gives yo

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9

2013-10-26 Thread domi
I updated jgit to the newest version - on MAC everything is still OK, but as I don't have windows box, I can't verify it… Robert, can you try it again with this version? /Domi On 25.10.2013, at 23:51, "Robert Scholte" wrote: > I can confirm the same issue on Windows 7. > Not being able to dele

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9

2013-10-25 Thread Robert Scholte
I can confirm the same issue on Windows 7. Not being able to delete a file often means that the outputstream wasn't closed after writing. The file seems to be generated by jgit, so I'm wondering if there's something which can be done by the scm-provider. Robert Op Fri, 25 Oct 2013 21:03:36

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9

2013-10-25 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi, It seems that this is not a new issue: https://builds.apache.org//view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-scm-windows/ Or more specifically: https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-scm-windows/org.apache.maven.scm$maven-scm-provider-jgit/ On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Dennis Lundbe

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9

2013-10-25 Thread Dennis Lundberg
-1 at the moment. The unit tests for the new jgit provider fails on Windows. Here's the surefire summary: Tests in error: JGitBranchCommandTckTest>BranchCommandTckTest.testBranchCommandTest:77 ╗ IO Fi... JGitChangeLogCommandTckTest>ScmTckTestCase.setUp:106->ScmTestCase.setUp:65 ╗ IO JGitCh

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9

2013-10-24 Thread Olivier Lamy
versions fixed in the site. On 25 October 2013 06:56, domi wrote: > There are some small issues on the docu of jgit: > http://maven.apache.org/scm-archives/scm-LATEST/maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-providers-git/maven-scm-provider-jgit/index.html > - nativ -> native > - Formatting of "Examples"

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9

2013-10-24 Thread domi
There are some small issues on the docu of jgit: http://maven.apache.org/scm-archives/scm-LATEST/maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-providers-git/maven-scm-provider-jgit/index.html - nativ -> native - Formatting of "Examples" + "changelog" titles - the versions in the snippets are wrong 1.8.1 -> 1.9 I

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9

2013-10-24 Thread Fred Cooke
+1 list looks good. Beware of jgit and symlinks, though, you can end up with a lot of disk and cpu churn because of it if not careful. On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 5:35 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hi, > We fixed 9 issues. The new feature is the jgit provider (based on jgit). > Details: > http://jira.

[VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9

2013-10-23 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, We fixed 9 issues. The new feature is the jgit provider (based on jgit). Details: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10527&version=18783 Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-027/ Staged site: http://maven.apache.org/scm-archives/