Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1 (Take 4)

2013-06-05 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 2013/6/1 Jason van Zyl : > Here are the release bits for 3.1.0-alpha-1: > > Release notes: > https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=18967 > > Staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-046/ > > Staged distribution: > https:/

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1 (Take 4)

2013-06-05 Thread Wayne Fay
Another late +1 from me. Looks good. I'm on vacation this week in Florida but found some time last night to run it against a handful of projects and didn't run into any issues. :) Wayne On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > Here are the release bits for 3.1.0-alpha-1: > > Rel

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1 (Take 4)

2013-06-04 Thread Mark Struberg
+1 did run it the last 2 days on many of my projects without any issues. LieGrue, strub - Original Message - > From: Brian Fox > To: Maven Developers List > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, 4 June 2013, 18:13 > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1 (Take 4) > > +1 >

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1 (Take 4)

2013-06-04 Thread Mark Derricutt
W00t - congrats to the Apache Maven Team Now... about that Maven 4.0 release... ;p Manfred Moser wrote: Awesome! Congrats to everyone involved. I am looking forward to adapting the Android Maven Plugin and releasing a new version asap! Manfred +1: Arnaud, Hervé, Brian, Baptiste, Mirko

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1 (Take 4)

2013-06-04 Thread Manfred Moser
Awesome! Congrats to everyone involved. I am looking forward to adapting the Android Maven Plugin and releasing a new version asap! Manfred > +1: Arnaud, Hervé, Brian, Baptiste, Mirko > > Vote passes. I will roll out the release later today. > > On Jun 4, 2013, at 12:13 PM, Brian Fox wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1 (Take 4)

2013-06-04 Thread Stephen Connolly
+1 (binding) On 1 June 2013 14:13, Jason van Zyl wrote: > Here are the release bits for 3.1.0-alpha-1: > > Release notes: > > https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=18967 > > Staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-046/ >

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1 (Take 4)

2013-06-04 Thread Jason van Zyl
+1: Arnaud, Hervé, Brian, Baptiste, Mirko Vote passes. I will roll out the release later today. On Jun 4, 2013, at 12:13 PM, Brian Fox wrote: > +1 > > On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: >> Here are the release bits for 3.1.0-alpha-1: >> >> Release notes: >> https://jira.cod

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1 (Take 4)

2013-06-04 Thread Brian Fox
+1 On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > Here are the release bits for 3.1.0-alpha-1: > > Release notes: > https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=18967 > > Staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-046/ > > S

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1 (Take 4)

2013-06-02 Thread Baptiste MATHUS
+1. 2013/6/2 Arnaud Héritier > +1 > > Le dimanche 2 juin 2013, Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit : > > > +1 > > > > Regards, > > > > Hervé > > > > Le samedi 1 juin 2013 09:13:17 Jason van Zyl a écrit : > > > Here are the release bits for 3.1.0-alpha-1: > > > > > > Release notes: > > > > > > https://jira.co

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1 (Take 4)

2013-06-02 Thread Arnaud Héritier
+1 Le dimanche 2 juin 2013, Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit : > +1 > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le samedi 1 juin 2013 09:13:17 Jason van Zyl a écrit : > > Here are the release bits for 3.1.0-alpha-1: > > > > Release notes: > > > https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=18 > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1 (Take 4)

2013-06-02 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
+1 Regards, Hervé Le samedi 1 juin 2013 09:13:17 Jason van Zyl a écrit : > Here are the release bits for 3.1.0-alpha-1: > > Release notes: > https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=18 > 967 > > Staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/reposi

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1 (Take 4)

2013-06-01 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 (non-binding) for (c726cdd3a9ad5c3a419e1171f8c1925e336ead18): - I successfully ran mvn verify site for some of my own projects (pom-only, one jar, multi-module). - the current trunk of maven-javadoc-plugin encountered some failing ITs. [ERROR] * additionnal-dependencies-non-aggregate/pom.xml [

[VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1 (Take 4)

2013-06-01 Thread Jason van Zyl
Here are the release bits for 3.1.0-alpha-1: Release notes: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=18967 Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-046/ Staged distribution: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ma

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-06-01 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
ok, the auto installer ant_maven.groovy script gets every released Maven version from our official release area [1] Then *any released* version will be available: once Maven 3.1.0-alpha-1 will be released, it will be shown by this script, ready to have many eyes, even if this release is only al

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-31 Thread Mark Derricutt
If one was to push this out for Jenkins to pick them - then this puts a cobwash on the other thread of reusing version numbers IMHO.If you're going to let alpha-1 bleed out to the greater internet, IT IS RELEASED :)IMHO. --Mark DerricuttSent with AirmailOn 31 May 2013 at 11:18:52 PM, Stephen Connol

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-31 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 31 May 2013 12:01, jieryn wrote: > Greetings, > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY > wrote: > > I don't know what you mean by "send pull requests to Jenkins", if you're > > talking about Apache's Jenkins instance or something more general from > the > > Jenkins project > > There

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-31 Thread jieryn
Greetings, On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > I don't know what you mean by "send pull requests to Jenkins", if you're > talking about Apache's Jenkins instance or something more general from the > Jenkins project There is something called the backend-crawler which locates c

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-30 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
I don't know what you mean by "send pull requests to Jenkins", if you're talking about Apache's Jenkins instance or something more general from the Jenkins project but I'm interested by the "it would be auto-installable" objective at least on Apache's Jenkins instance so I'll read any pointer

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-30 Thread jieryn
Greetings, On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > (Aside: not sure that we'll get that much more eyes for 3.1.0-alpha-x... I > think the eyes will only hit it when we get to 3.1.0...) It would be nice if someone sent pull requests to Jenkins so that it would be auto-installab

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-30 Thread Stephen Connolly
Go for it! (Aside: not sure that we'll get that much more eyes for 3.1.0-alpha-x... I think the eyes will only hit it when we get to 3.1.0...) On Thursday, 30 May 2013, Jason van Zyl wrote: > I'm going to stick to alpha-1. No one has looked at it save 10 people > which doesn't, to me, constitute

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-30 Thread Jason van Zyl
I'm going to stick to alpha-1. No one has looked at it save 10 people which doesn't, to me, constitute any reasonably sized population. I'll roll it out in the morning. On May 30, 2013, at 4:15 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > You are the release manager. My vote on respinning specifically state

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-30 Thread Stephen Connolly
You are the release manager. My vote on respinning specifically stated that any releases in progress, the release manager can decide. If it were me I'd call it 3.1.0-beta-1 as we have had enough eyes by now that its better than alpha... I'd also be happy going straight for the 3.1.0 end game... Bu

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-30 Thread Jason van Zyl
Ok, we're just waiting now for Stephen to summarize the vote and then when we figure out what to call it I'll roll out the release. On May 30, 2013, at 2:32 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/AetherClassNotFound > > page created > improvements welcome

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-30 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/AetherClassNotFound page created improvements welcome Regards, Hervé Le jeudi 30 mai 2013 09:10:50 Arnaud Héritier a écrit : > Perfect. Thx > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > MNG-5482 fixed: ok for me to go for take 4

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-30 Thread Arnaud Héritier
Perfect. Thx On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > MNG-5482 fixed: ok for me to go for take 4 > > when a plugin cannot be loaded due to missing Sonatype Aether class, hint > url > will be > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/AetherClassNotFound > > the Wiki articl

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-29 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
MNG-5482 fixed: ok for me to go for take 4 when a plugin cannot be loaded due to missing Sonatype Aether class, hint url will be http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/AetherClassNotFound the Wiki article still needs to be written... Regards, Hervé Le mercredi 29 mai 2013 09:34:46

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-29 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Arnaud Héritier wrote: >> >> But having said all that, if we can find a good way to flag versions as not >> released (e.g. a release history page or something) I am not against >> skipping version numbers. Might confuse people though if that meant that >> the firs

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-29 Thread Robert Scholte
DOAP issues have been fixed. Let's wait for Hervé before spinning a new release. Robert Op Wed, 29 May 2013 01:21:52 +0200 schreef Jason van Zyl : I'll see if Robert wants to fix the DOAP file and I'll respin tomorrow after he's commented. On May 28, 2013, at 7:17 PM, Stephen Connolly

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-29 Thread Jason van Zyl
Sure, go for it. The less confusing to users the better. On May 29, 2013, at 1:36 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > I'd like to work on Arnaud's idea of error message enhancement in case a > plugin fails because of unavailable Sonatype Aether: if you can let me 12 > more > hours from now, I'll do it

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-29 Thread Olivier Lamy
Yup tomcat does it. compare http://archive.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-7/ with http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/ and http://archive.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-6/ with http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/ 2013/5/29 Kristian Rosenvold : > Isn't the main sour

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-29 Thread Stephen Connolly
I am fine with it if there is a clear page which shows the status of each release (i.e. linked from the downloads page: http://maven.apache.org/download.cgi) And if we want to go that way, I say let's just drop all the alpha crap. and go for 3.1.0 straight. My point is that there is a trade off..

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-29 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Isn't the main source of confusion here that the "vote" thread is not detached from the previous thread and that "Take X" is not added to the subject ? Kristian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For addit

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-29 Thread Arnaud Héritier
> > But having said all that, if we can find a good way to flag versions as not > released (e.g. a release history page or something) I am not against > skipping version numbers. Might confuse people though if that meant that > the first release of Maven 3.1.0 was 3.1.4 (i.e. if we had not been doi

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-29 Thread Olivier Lamy
2013/5/29 Stephen Connolly : > On 29 May 2013 06:49, jieryn wrote: > >> Greetings, >> >> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY >> wrote: >> > I'd like to work on Arnaud's idea of error message enhancement in case a >> > plugin fails because of unavailable Sonatype Aether: if you can let

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-29 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 29 May 2013 06:49, jieryn wrote: > Greetings, > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY > wrote: > > I'd like to work on Arnaud's idea of error message enhancement in case a > > plugin fails because of unavailable Sonatype Aether: if you can let me > 12 more > > hours from now, I'll

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-29 Thread Arnaud Héritier
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > There were method signature changes as well, so its not just a package > rename IIRC > Ok that explains it I remember there were some threads about it but I didn't read all of them. > > > On 29 May

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-29 Thread Stephen Connolly
There were method signature changes as well, so its not just a package rename IIRC On 29 May 2013 08:57, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Arnaud Héritier wrote: > > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY > > wrote: > > > >> good idea: can you open a Jira issue? > >> > > > > Done : https://jira

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-29 Thread Jörg Schaible
Arnaud Héritier wrote: > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY > wrote: > >> good idea: can you open a Jira issue? >> > > Done : https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5482 > Another probably more stupid idea : Wasn't it possible to use the shade > plugin or something like this to provid

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-29 Thread Arnaud Héritier
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > good idea: can you open a Jira issue? > Done : https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5482 Another probably more stupid idea : Wasn't it possible to use the shade plugin or something like this to provide a version of aether under the old grou

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-29 Thread Mark Struberg
alpha-1 to n works fine imo. We should not loose pace by holding up the effort with such minor stuff. LieGrue, strub - Original Message - > From: Baptiste Mathus > To: Maven Developers List > Cc: > Sent: Wednesday, 29 May 2013, 8:47 > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apach

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-28 Thread Baptiste Mathus
Le 29 mai 2013 08:07, "Mirko Friedenhagen" a écrit : > > On May 29, 2013 7:49 AM, "jieryn" wrote: > > > > Greetings, > > > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY > wrote: > > > I'd like to work on Arnaud's idea of error message enhancement in case a > > > plugin fails because of unavai

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-28 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
On May 29, 2013 7:49 AM, "jieryn" wrote: > > Greetings, > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > I'd like to work on Arnaud's idea of error message enhancement in case a > > plugin fails because of unavailable Sonatype Aether: if you can let me 12 more > > hours from now, I'l

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-28 Thread jieryn
Greetings, On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > I'd like to work on Arnaud's idea of error message enhancement in case a > plugin fails because of unavailable Sonatype Aether: if you can let me 12 more > hours from now, I'll do it tonight Version numbers are cheap. Can't we ju

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-28 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
good idea: can you open a Jira issue? notice, at a first pass, improving content of http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/PluginContainerException to explain the special case of Aether is easy. But I'll try to have a dedicated link tonight: I know that the code will go in DefaultExce

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-28 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
I'd like to work on Arnaud's idea of error message enhancement in case a plugin fails because of unavailable Sonatype Aether: if you can let me 12 more hours from now, I'll do it tonight Regards, Hervé Le mardi 28 mai 2013 19:21:52 Jason van Zyl a écrit : > I'll see if Robert wants to fix the

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-28 Thread Brett Porter
Pushed a small additional fix for typo and clarification based on the names in the POMs. On 28/05/2013, at 4:07 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > This should suffice for the notice: > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=maven.git;a=commitdiff;h=b0a83f62 > > On May 28, 2013, at 5:48 PM, Steph

CANCELLED Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-28 Thread Jason van Zyl
I'll respin in the morning with an identifying subject line. On May 28, 2013, at 7:27 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > OK. You should probably send out a Cancel notice for this vote and when > launching the take 4 (I think this will be take 4 but I could be wrong) > vote I recommend putting take 4

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-28 Thread Stephen Connolly
OK. You should probably send out a Cancel notice for this vote and when launching the take 4 (I think this will be take 4 but I could be wrong) vote I recommend putting take 4 in the subject line as Gmail folded the -044 staging repo into the same thread as -038 so it was harder for some people to

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-28 Thread Jason van Zyl
I'll see if Robert wants to fix the DOAP file and I'll respin tomorrow after he's commented. On May 28, 2013, at 7:17 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > Yep looks fine to me. If you want to respin now, from _my_ PoV *should* > be no issues now... of course who knows what will crop up with the n

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-28 Thread Stephen Connolly
Yep looks fine to me. If you want to respin now, from _my_ PoV *should* be no issues now... of course who knows what will crop up with the next review ;-) On 29 May 2013 00:07, Jason van Zyl wrote: > This should suffice for the notice: > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=maven.git

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-28 Thread Jason van Zyl
This should suffice for the notice: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=maven.git;a=commitdiff;h=b0a83f62 On May 28, 2013, at 5:48 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > From my PoV the only outstanding issue is that the NOTICE.txt does not > reflect the fact that it is now Eclipse Aether and no

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-28 Thread Stephen Connolly
>From my PoV the only outstanding issue is that the NOTICE.txt does not reflect the fact that it is now Eclipse Aether and no longer Sonatype Aether. I am unclear what the exact wording that is required, I am hoping that somebody else can correct the file. All the license header issues are, to my

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-28 Thread Jason van Zyl
It's very easy to cut another release. If all the fixes are in that the PMC wishes it takes minutes to roll the release again. On May 28, 2013, at 4:43 PM, Robert Scholte wrote: > Some additional remarks: > - The copyright doesn't include current year (I've already fixed that on the > trunk) >

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-28 Thread Robert Scholte
Some additional remarks: - The copyright doesn't include current year (I've already fixed that on the trunk) - doap:generate fails: The generated DOAP doesn't respect ASF rules. Just to be sure I understand correctly: these alpha-versions will never be released. They are created so users can

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-28 Thread Robert Scholte
Done, see http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/commit/e1807abf Op Tue, 28 May 2013 21:02:24 +0200 schreef Stephen Connolly : Go for it. I committed the license header fix-ups Not sure myself what the exact wording is that should go in the NOTICE.txt but I know it is wrong... Th

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-28 Thread Stephen Connolly
Go for it. I committed the license header fix-ups Not sure myself what the exact wording is that should go in the NOTICE.txt but I know it is wrong... Therefore AIUI that is a blocker for the PMC permitting the release as is... In any case if the rest of the PMC do not see it as a blocker migh

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-28 Thread Robert Scholte
One small comment regarding the packaging.html files: IMO any package.html under src/main/java should be replaced package-info.java, because it doesn't make sense to have html-files between the java-sources. Robert Op Tue, 28 May 2013 10:38:07 +0200 schreef Stephen Connolly : [x] Buil

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-28 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Would it help to catch NoClassDefFoundError DefaultBuildPluginManager.executeMojo and if it's anything in the org/sonatype/aether/ space, give a warning about requiring newer plugin? Kristian 2013/5/28 Arnaud Héritier : > For now I had no issue with this release after an upgrade of few plugins >

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-28 Thread Arnaud Héritier
For now I had no issue with this release after an upgrade of few plugins In the future (another Alpha ..) couldn't you catch such error and provide a more user friendly message asking to upgrade the plugin : [INFO] Dependency-reduced POM written at: /Users/arnaud/Code/eXo/platform-public-distribu

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-28 Thread Stephen Connolly
[x] Builds from source bundle [x] Builds some complex projects [x] Contains correct LICENSE.txt [ ] NOTICE.txt correctly attributes 3rd party components (See observation 1) [?] All source files, where appropriate, contain the ASL header (See observation 2) [?] Binary archives bundled within the sou

RE: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-28 Thread Sievers, Jan
Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1 Tested on my Tycho (0.17.0 and latest staged 0.18.0) build and it fails but I think this is a Tycho issue. Regards Jeff On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Baptiste MATHUS wrote: > OK, you're right. Jason's cancellation mail was

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-28 Thread Jeff MAURY
Tested on my Tycho (0.17.0 and latest staged 0.18.0) build and it fails but I think this is a Tycho issue. Regards Jeff On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Baptiste MATHUS wrote: > OK, you're right. Jason's cancellation mail was > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/201305.mbox/br

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-28 Thread Baptiste MATHUS
OK, you're right. Jason's cancellation mail was http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/201305.mbox/browser and is actually for -038. Gmail has merged threads for me so I mixed up things. Thanks 2013/5/28 Stephen Connolly > I think staging 044 is the respin > > > On 28 May 2013 08:

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-28 Thread Stephen Connolly
I think staging 044 is the respin On 28 May 2013 08:10, Baptiste MATHUS wrote: > I *think* that vote was also cancelled, isn't it? > > > 2013/5/27 Hervé BOUTEMY > > > +1 > > > > works fine for me > > > > Regards, > > > > Hervé > > > > Le samedi 25 mai 2013 08:51:00 Jason van Zyl a écrit : > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-28 Thread Baptiste MATHUS
I *think* that vote was also cancelled, isn't it? 2013/5/27 Hervé BOUTEMY > +1 > > works fine for me > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le samedi 25 mai 2013 08:51:00 Jason van Zyl a écrit : > > Here are the release bits for 3.1.0-alpha-1: > > > > Release notes: > > > https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/R

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-27 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
+1 works fine for me Regards, Hervé Le samedi 25 mai 2013 08:51:00 Jason van Zyl a écrit : > Here are the release bits for 3.1.0-alpha-1: > > Release notes: > https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=18 > 967 > > Staging repository: > https://repository.apache

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-25 Thread Mark Derricutt
n Zyl [mailto:ja...@tesla.io] Envoyé : samedi 25 mai 2013 14:51 À : Maven Developers List Objet : [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1 Here are the release bits for 3.1.0-alpha-1: Release notes: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=18 967 Staging reposito

RE: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-25 Thread Eric Barboni
update dependency shared:maven-dependency-tree from 2.0 to 2.1 Regards, Eric -Message d'origine- De : Jason van Zyl [mailto:ja...@tesla.io] Envoyé : samedi 25 mai 2013 14:51 À : Maven Developers List Objet : [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1 Here are the release bits for 3.1.0-al

[VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-25 Thread Jason van Zyl
Here are the release bits for 3.1.0-alpha-1: Release notes: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=18967 Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-044/ Staged distribution: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ma

CANCELLED Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-25 Thread Jason van Zyl
And one more time. The snapshot repository is still in there. On May 23, 2013, at 2:02 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > Here are the release bits for 3.1.0-alpha-1: > > Release notes: > https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=18967 > > Staging repository: > https://

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-25 Thread Jason van Zyl
Not intentional, I'm working in a branch from the first time I cut the release and I changed that one. I'll re-cut it shortly. On May 25, 2013, at 3:25 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > the snapshot repository in parent pom is still here: IIUC, it was one of the > reason you cancelled previous vote >

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-25 Thread Mark Derricutt
Well that's just showing off now isn't it :) Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: I deployed Maven 3.1.0-alpha-1 site with itself:) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apa

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-25 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
the snapshot repository in parent pom is still here: IIUC, it was one of the reason you cancelled previous vote is this intentional? what impact does it have? Regards, Hervé Le jeudi 23 mai 2013 14:02:44 Jason van Zyl a écrit : > Here are the release bits for 3.1.0-alpha-1: > > Release notes:

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-25 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
I deployed Maven 3.1.0-alpha-1 site with itself :) Regards, Hervé Le samedi 25 mai 2013 17:30:50 Mark Derricutt a écrit : > +1 Looking good for me on my multi-module OSGi builds, > clojure-maven-plugin and ITs, releases made to both projects and so far > nothing jumping out at me - tho I'm not b

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-24 Thread Mark Derricutt
+1 Looking good for me on my multi-module OSGi builds, clojure-maven-plugin and ITs, releases made to both projects and so far nothing jumping out at me - tho I'm not building any maven sites or anything. Jason van Zyl wrote: Thanks. On May 23, 2013, at 6:40 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: site

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-23 Thread Jason van Zyl
Thanks. On May 23, 2013, at 6:40 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > site published (sync pending): > http://maven.apache.org/ref/3.1.0-alpha-1 > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le jeudi 23 mai 2013 16:52:13 Jason van Zyl a écrit : >> If you are to test the source you're suppose to actually test the source

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-23 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
site published (sync pending): http://maven.apache.org/ref/3.1.0-alpha-1 Regards, Hervé Le jeudi 23 mai 2013 16:52:13 Jason van Zyl a écrit : > If you are to test the source you're suppose to actually test the source > distribution. > > If you want to test via the sha1 here you go: > 32d720ea0

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-23 Thread Jason van Zyl
If you are to test the source you're suppose to actually test the source distribution. If you want to test via the sha1 here you go: 32d720ea0c669d4f55c0f71e4f3e054695648732 If someone else can publish the site I'd appreciate it. On May 23, 2013, at 4:26 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > What i

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-23 Thread Stephen Connolly
What is the tag or git hash (as votes are on source not on binary builds) and is the site staged? On Thursday, 23 May 2013, Jason van Zyl wrote: > Here are the release bits for 3.1.0-alpha-1: > > Release notes: > > https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=18967 >

[VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-23 Thread Jason van Zyl
Here are the release bits for 3.1.0-alpha-1: Release notes: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=18967 Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-038/ Staged distribution: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ma

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-07 Thread Jason van Zyl
The vote for 3.1.0-alpha-1 is cancelled. There is a snapshot repository in the parent POM and the vote has gone on for far longer than acceptable. Hervé go ahead and update any versions of the POMs you like, I have some small changes I'm going to make and when you're happy with the updated plugi

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-04 Thread Jason van Zyl
Sure, update all the plugins. We might as well do all that maintenance work now before the next release. I can look at making an enforcer rule. It's been something I've been meaning at looking at is breaking out all the checks in the release plugin to enforcer rules so they can be used anywhere.

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-04 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
uh, I didn't see this one :( if the check can be automated through an enforcer rule, this would be a Good Thing (TM) I finally found my way with maven-dependency-tree (vote in progress) + dependency:tree (re-added verbose mode, which was a big users expectation). And since I have some time this

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-04 Thread Jason van Zyl
I will cancel the vote and respin it. No one has looked that hard: there's a snapshot repository in the top-level POM. I haven't made any noise as Hervé is trying to release all the prerequisites so that some of the standard plugins don't fail. On May 2, 2013, at 5:16 PM, Stephen Connolly wr

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-02 Thread Stephen Connolly
Currently it's +1 (binding): Hervé & me Some other +1's and -1's I'd expect the release manager for ths release to have made some noise by now (as any release manager should) On Thursday, 2 May 2013, Stephen Connolly wrote: > I think we are just waiting for one more binding vote from a PMC mem

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-02 Thread Stephen Connolly
I think we are just waiting for one more binding vote from a PMC member... But somebody should double check the count On Thursday, 2 May 2013, ceki wrote: > Hello all, > > Out of curiosity, are there any other non-resolved issues holding up this > release? > > Best regards, > > On 23.04.2013 12:2

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-02 Thread ceki
Hello all, Out of curiosity, are there any other non-resolved issues holding up this release? Best regards, On 23.04.2013 12:24, Stephen Connolly wrote: +1 (binding) for 3.1.0-alpha-1 The following issue needs to be resolved before I will vote +1 on a non-alpha release: http://jira.codehau

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-04-27 Thread Stuart McCulloch
On 27 Apr 2013, at 18:52, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > -1 (non binding) > > I've found an issue with an integration of my plugin developments which works > with Maven 3.0.X without any problem but with Maven 3.1-alpha-1 it fails. > I've created a gist (https://gist.github.com/khmarbaise/5473941)

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-04-27 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
-1 (non binding) I've found an issue with an integration of my plugin developments which works with Maven 3.0.X without any problem but with Maven 3.1-alpha-1 it fails. I've created a gist (https://gist.github.com/khmarbaise/5473941) which shows the whole debug output following only an excerpt

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-04-19 Thread Stuart McCulloch
Not sure, but I've just logged https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=406056 in the Tycho project so it's at least tracked. On 19 Apr 2013, at 07:53, Anders Hammar wrote: > Does anyone (Igor?) know if there is work going on to make Tycho work with > this? > > /Anders > > > On Fri, Apr

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-04-19 Thread Anders Hammar
Does anyone (Igor?) know if there is work going on to make Tycho work with this? /Anders On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > back to the vote > +1 > > - maven-report-exec 1.1 makes m-site-p work with this release: no need to > wait > for m-site-p 3.3, we can add instructions

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-04-18 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
back to the vote +1 - maven-report-exec 1.1 makes m-site-p work with this release: no need to wait for m-site-p 3.3, we can add instructions on how to use p-site-p 3.x + maven- report-exec 1.1 like http://svn.apache.org/r1467751 - maven-dependency-tree 2.1-SNAPSHOT makes dependency:tree, shade an

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-04-09 Thread Andrei Pozolotin
this will work as well, thank you for the idea. Original Message Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1 From: Nigel Magnay To: Maven Developers List Date: Tue 09 Apr 2013 03:47:21 AM CDT > This keeps coming up, over and over and over. > > e.g: > http://ma

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-04-09 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
that's it, it works thank you Stuart: I knew I was missing something like this = few code but major structure :) Regards, Hervé Le mardi 9 avril 2013 12:30:31 Stuart McCulloch a écrit : > On 9 Apr 2013, at 03:33, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > I just did the reimport and changed API to let the code

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-04-09 Thread Stuart McCulloch
On 9 Apr 2013, at 03:33, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > I just did the reimport and changed API to let the code compile [1] > > but I get Guice provisioning exceptions during tests: probably something > stupid in initialization, but I don't know what to do > Can you help me at this step, please? You ne

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-04-09 Thread Nigel Magnay
rc/main/java/org/apache/karaf/tooling/features/InstallKarsMojo.java#L215 > > which contradicts the dependency resolution rules and really does not work. > > hence my request to "relax". is there any other ways to address this need? > > Andrei > > Origi

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-04-08 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
I just did the reimport and changed API to let the code compile [1] but I get Guice provisioning exceptions during tests: probably something stupid in initialization, but I don't know what to do Can you help me at this step, please? Regards, Hervé [1] https://github.com/hboutemy/maven Le mard

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-04-08 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le dimanche 7 avril 2013 22:29:29 Jason van Zyl a écrit : > On Apr 7, 2013, at 7:32 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > while working on site publication, I found that all my work on > > maven-aether- provider unit tests had simply been pruned when merging > > Aether. I will need to re-do the work, step

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-04-07 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Apr 7, 2013, at 7:32 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > while working on site publication, I found that all my work on maven-aether- > provider unit tests had simply been pruned when merging Aether. I will need > to > re-do the work, step by step :( > I don't think you need to redo anything. If y

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-04-07 Thread Mark Derricutt
Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: while working on site publication, I found that all my work on maven-aether- provider unit tests had simply been pruned when merging Aether. I will need to re-do the work, step by step:( Hervé - if this is all in git, you should be able to still find all your commits via "gi

  1   2   >