> >Also, if there is open discussion about changes to the pom, are there
> >plans to address any of the requests for project.xml changes in the
> >jira? (i have a personal interest in MAVEN-954, and would like to
> >see more meta-data in the elements. In a corporate
> >environment, phone number
Erdfelt,
Also, if there is open discussion about changes to the pom, are there
plans to address any of the requests for project.xml changes in the
jira? (i have a personal interest in MAVEN-954, and would like to
see more meta-data in the elements. In a corporate
environment, phone number, dep
> We can make it without tag.
>
> For example it is just enough to put download URL of javamail to
> http://www.ibblio.org/maven/javamail/poms/javamail-1.1.pom
> and every project can profit from this.
>
> Anyway - I am _not_ proposing that we should drop tag.
Heh. *whew*.
But having the po
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 04:43, Michal Maczka wrote:
> Vincent Massol wrote:
>
> >Ok, after the discussion on the thread titled "[Proposal] Project
> >deliverables definition in POM", it seems we agree on adding a
> >element in the POM for now. As not everyone has answered, I'd like to
> >propose a
Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
Michal Maczka wrote:
Other thinng I was thinking of is to introduce element
javadocUrl will point to URL when project's javadocs are accessible.
This can be used for liniking project's javadocs with javadocs of
other projects
(http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/toold
Michal Maczka wrote:
Other thinng I was thinking of is to introduce element
javadocUrl will point to URL when project's javadocs are accessible.
This can be used for liniking project's javadocs with javadocs of other
projects
(http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/tooldocs/windows/javadoc.html
Vincent Massol wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Michal Maczka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 November 2003 10:44
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adding type element in POM
[snip]
When any changes to POM will be introduced should we increment it to
4?
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Michal Maczka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 13 November 2003 10:44
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adding type element in POM
[snip]
>
> When any changes to POM will be introduced should we increment it to
>
Vincent Massol wrote:
Ok, after the discussion on the thread titled "[Proposal] Project
deliverables definition in POM", it seems we agree on adding a
element in the POM for now. As not everyone has answered, I'd like to
propose a vote for this. If it passes, I can implement it quickly.
Here's my
Ok, after the discussion on the thread titled "[Proposal] Project
deliverables definition in POM", it seems we agree on adding a
element in the POM for now. As not everyone has answered, I'd like to
propose a vote for this. If it passes, I can implement it quickly.
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
10 matches
Mail list logo
