Re: [PROPOSAL] Release plan for the Site Plugin

2008-09-08 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Lukas Theussl wrote: > Sounds good to me. I haven't quite followed the discussion on release > plans recently but it's still itching me to get doxia released. Great > Just a few comments: > > - I proposed on the doxia-dev list to release the alpha branch as 1.0 > final but haven't gotten any fee

Re: [PROPOSAL] Release plan for the Site Plugin

2008-09-08 Thread Lukas Theussl
Sounds good to me. I haven't quite followed the discussion on release plans recently but it's still itching me to get doxia released. Just a few comments: - I proposed on the doxia-dev list to release the alpha branch as 1.0 final but haven't gotten any feedback. I think it's a good idea, dox

Re: [PROPOSAL] Release plan for the Site Plugin

2008-09-07 Thread Brett Porter
+1 to all, with one small addition/alteration to (2). I would pursue 2.1 along the "current" codeline. As far as doxia upgrades go, I would prefer we investigate a proper separation in Maven core for 2.2 (or if anyone can get it done faster, 2.1). On that note, to date I don't understand ex

[PROPOSAL] Release plan for the Site Plugin

2008-09-07 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hello With the new release plan in place for Maven core I think we need to make a similar plan for Maven Site Plugin. Because Maven 2.1 will upgrade to Doxia 1.0-beta-1, the Site Plugin needs to do the same at some point. We just need to find the right point in time for it. Here's what I propose,