On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 6:17 PM, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> As I'm sure you've noticed from the discussion on this list and my commit
> logs, I've been working to solve a problem between concrete interpolation of
> the POM at project-construction time and the need to u
Brett Porter wrote:
That said, this solution does sound a bit heavy handed. Even though we
have a bunch of ITs, something about this feels like it might break
something else. Do you have any thoughts on areas of risk outside what
the ITs already cover?
I'd say the places currently most at r
Hi John,
I haven't looked at the code, but angling at it purely from the
proposal... it does make sense - the problem in the related issues is
forking lifecycles. In general, under the current structure, keeping
the pre-interpolated model and applying that after forking would make
sense.
Hi everyone,
As I'm sure you've noticed from the discussion on this list and my
commit logs, I've been working to solve a problem between concrete
interpolation of the POM at project-construction time and the need to
update plugin configurations to reflect changing state in the project
instan
