On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 9:35 AM Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> * Support for XML entities / XInclude
Careful with that one! You might open a flood of security reports like
"If the included file looks like this, or that, then ..."
Jochen
-
Le lun. 28 août 2023 à 08:04, Olivier Lamy a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 22 Aug 2023 at 17:36, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I hope you guys have been able to rest a bit during the summer (for those
> > that are back to work already)...
> >
> > I've pushed a few important PRs
Hi,
On Tue, 22 Aug 2023 at 17:36, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I hope you guys have been able to rest a bit during the summer (for those
> that are back to work already)...
>
> I've pushed a few important PRs in the past months and I'd really like to
> get the discussion going arou
Interesting - I see between alpha-5 and alpha-7 - tiles-maven-pllugin
seems to work again (noticed this building alpha-8-SNAPSHOT).
That’s good to know - will make evaluating the new mixins easier as well.
--
"Great artists are extremely selfish and arrogant things" — Steven Wilson,
Porcupine T
On 23/08/2023 at 9:46:16 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> The two ITs for mixins are available at
>
> https://github.com/apache/maven-integration-testing/pull/280/commits/13173969007b5e3b307ef5b191ac2d52a23dce6c
>
Nice - that looks like it should work - does that unfold into the
effective-pom at a
The two ITs for mixins are available at
https://github.com/apache/maven-integration-testing/pull/280/commits/13173969007b5e3b307ef5b191ac2d52a23dce6c
Le mar. 22 août 2023 à 23:30, Mark Derricutt a écrit :
> Definitely keen on seeing this, or the approach taken - as Maven 4.x
> breaks the existi
Definitely keen on seeing this, or the approach taken - as Maven 4.x
breaks the existing usage of tiles-maven-plugin so having something
supported, that covers the same featureset would be good.
Where in GIthub can I see the IT’s mentioned here?
On 22/08/2023 at 7:32:12 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrot
FWIW, I don't have an issue with XML in general, just the style we use.
An as aside, I find it amusing to watch the JSON folks reinvent each and
every wheel that XML has been using for decades.
Gary
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023, 10:34 AM Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> @Gary Gregory thing is that we regu
@Gary Gregory thing is that we regularly hear that
but nobody (as in "not significantly enough") embraced polyglot so means
the verbosity is something you note but don't really care after all
probably (not 100% sure it would help to solve that since attributes have
kind of the same cons, ie make t
One of Maven's pain points (a criticism hear at least) it's verbosity due
to the XML style where almost everything is an element. If I can more
succinctly list my dependencies, I would consider that a first win in this
new Era that will be highly visible to even the most casual user :-)
Hopefully t
@Gary it is the stage "you can do whatever you like on your side", even a
pom.properties flavor would work. I assume one of the most requested
feature will be to flatten attributes more than inlining them
("org.apache.foo:bar:1.2.3") but on the core side the challenge can be to
not break too fast a
Not directly, but a simple extension could allow that...
Le mar. 22 août 2023 à 12:33, Gary Gregory a
écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> Would any of these changes allow me to write my POM's XML dependencies in a
> single element where the GID, AID, and version are attributes (and not
> child elements)?
>
>
I should have said "primitive" attributes plus Strings (and maybe
Durations).
Gary
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023, 8:03 AM Elliotte Rusty Harold
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 10:33 AM Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> ="2.13.0" ... />
> >
> > In general, I want the XML to more OO, where XML elements are object
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 10:33 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
="2.13.0" ... />
>
> In general, I want the XML to more OO, where XML elements are objects and
> attributes are, well, attributes.
That dog won't hunt for reasons that are not specific to Maven. In OO
attributes can be arbitrarily complex stru
Hi all,
Would any of these changes allow me to write my POM's XML dependencies in a
single element where the GID, AID, and version are attributes (and not
child elements)?
In general, I want the XML to more OO, where XML elements are objects and
attributes are, well, attributes.
Gary
On Tue,
Globally it looks good, the only minor detail I would make is that instead
of inlining params in methods considered as API (extension points, the
model reader for ex) I would use a "request" object so read(a, b) would
become read(req) to enable use to make it evolving more reliably instead of
relyi
Hi everyone,
I hope you guys have been able to rest a bit during the summer (for those
that are back to work already)...
I've pushed a few important PRs in the past months and I'd really like to
get the discussion going around those. Those are major changes that I
think we should introduce in Ma
17 matches
Mail list logo
