The later, I think.
Is it reasonable to simply ditch FastMap from the bridge, and plan to
add a javolution dependency to each place we find a use of FastMap?
That would be my recommendation now that you ask.
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> why not copy their tests... o
why not copy their tests... or are you suggesting that the replacement
is to use the class directly?
On 12 June 2011 21:01, Benson Margulies wrote:
> This is just a copy of a class from javolution with the package name
> changed. Javolution is BSD licensed. So, I propose to add the
> dependency,
This is just a copy of a class from javolution with the package name
changed. Javolution is BSD licensed. So, I propose to add the
dependency, create a pass-through class in the plexus package, and
write no tests, on the theory that the javolution people have adequate
tests for themselves.
---
