Re: [1/2] git commit: o Remove Assignee and Fix-Version columns from Jira report (we're using onlyCurrentVersion=true anyway), use surefire-${project.version} as path name in surefire-archives

2014-10-31 Thread Andreas Gudian
it to people.apache.org and commit manually from there - only takes some minutes then. ;-) Am Freitag, 31. Oktober 2014 schrieb Hervé BOUTEMY : > > - surefire-archives/surefire-LATEST > > +surefire-archives/surefire-${project.version} > > > > are you sure it's a good id

Re: [1/2] git commit: o Remove Assignee and Fix-Version columns from Jira report (we're using onlyCurrentVersion=true anyway), use surefire-${project.version} as path name in surefire-archives

2014-10-31 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
> - surefire-archives/surefire-LATEST > +surefire-archives/surefire-${project.version} > are you sure it's a good idea not to follow others components structure [1] Regards, Hervé [1] http://maven.apache.org/developers/website/deploy-component-reference-documentation.html

Re: Project.version too contextual

2013-05-24 Thread Fred Cooke
y, and I still need to apologise to you for my last >>> > mistake, there is something like @{} in use in one of the (core?) >>> plugins? >>> > I seem to remember trying to use it elsewhere and being disappointed >>> :-) >>> > >>> > Regards, >

Re: Project.version too contextual

2013-05-24 Thread Robert Scholte
being disappointed :-) > > Regards, > > Fred. > > [1] http://maven.apache.org/ref/3.1.0-alpha-1/maven-model-builder/ > > > Le vendredi 24 mai 2013 06:43:35 Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > Project.version seems evaluate

Re: Project.version too contextual

2013-05-24 Thread Fred Cooke
; > > > Regards, > > > > Fred. > > > > [1] http://maven.apache.org/ref/3.1.0-alpha-1/maven-model-builder/ > > > > > Le vendredi 24 mai 2013 06:43:35 Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > > > Projec

Re: Project.version too contextual

2013-05-24 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
> > Regards, > > Fred. > > [1] http://maven.apache.org/ref/3.1.0-alpha-1/maven-model-builder/ > > > Le vendredi 24 mai 2013 06:43:35 Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > Project.version seems evaluated by pom and not from

Re: Project.version too contextual

2013-05-24 Thread Fred Cooke
ne of the (core?) plugins? I seem to remember trying to use it elsewhere and being disappointed :-) Regards, Fred. [1] http://maven.apache.org/ref/3.1.0-alpha-1/maven-model-builder/ > > Le vendredi 24 mai 2013 06:43:35 Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > > Hi guys, > > > > Pro

Re: Project.version too contextual

2013-05-24 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
gt; > > Yes, that's what i expected but ATM in TomEE we have > > hardcoded version and for half of the project it > > matches the project.version (but only half :(). > > > > That's not blocking at all but if maven could get this kind of feature > > (

Re: Project.version too contextual

2013-05-24 Thread Brett Porter
f the project it > matches the project.version (but only half :(). > > That's not blocking at all but if maven could get this kind of feature > (maybe #{project.version}) it would be really great > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <http

Re: Project.version too contextual

2013-05-23 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Yes, that's what i expected but ATM in TomEE we have hardcoded version and for half of the project it matches the project.version (but only half :(). That's not blocking at all but if maven could get this kind of feature (maybe #{project.version}) it would be really great *Romain M

Re: Project.version too contextual

2013-05-23 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
yes, it is the expected behaviour see [1] for complete documentation of the model building algorithm: project.version is evaluated during "model interpolation", which happens after inheritance AFAIK, there is no feature to evaluate before inheritance: this would require a new not

Project.version too contextual

2013-05-23 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi guys, Project.version seems evaluated by pom and not from the pom it is defined (at least in a multi modules project without a single version). So basically you can get a version very different from the expected one. If this is the expected behavior, could it be another variable to force the

Re: git commit: fix site deploy for svnpubsub using site:stage with ${project.artifactId}-archives/${project.artifactId}-${project.version} will expand values in addition of parent so sucks for multi

2013-01-02 Thread Robert Scholte
ation > Robert > > Op Sat, 22 Dec 2012 00:29:15 +0100 schreef : >> Updated Branches: >> refs/heads/master fe5c0331b -> 67ecba8ab >> >> fix site deploy for svnpubsub >> using site:stage with >> ${project.artifactId}-archives/${project.artifac

Re: git commit: fix site deploy for svnpubsub using site:stage with ${project.artifactId}-archives/${project.artifactId}-${project.version} will expand values in addition of parent so sucks for multi

2013-01-01 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
of using ${project.artifactId} variable: I dreamt a little too much on the pattern simpification > > > Robert > > > > Op Sat, 22 Dec 2012 00:29:15 +0100 schreef : > >> Updated Branches: > >> refs/heads/master fe5c0331b -> 67ecba8ab > >> &g

Re: git commit: fix site deploy for svnpubsub using site:stage with ${project.artifactId}-archives/${project.artifactId}-${project.version} will expand values in addition of parent so sucks for multi

2012-12-23 Thread Robert Scholte
o file:///Users/olamy/dev/sources/maven/maven-release/target/staging/../../maven-release-manager-archives/maven-release-manager-2.5-SNAPSHOT/maven-release-manager this is not correct ${project.artifactId}-archives/${project.artifactId}-${project.version} then scm:svn:https://svn.apache.org/repos/

Re: git commit: fix site deploy for svnpubsub using site:stage with ${project.artifactId}-archives/${project.artifactId}-${project.version} will expand values in addition of parent so sucks for multi

2012-12-22 Thread Olivier Lamy
ile:///Users/olamy/dev/sources/maven/maven-release/target/staging/../../maven-release-manager-archives/maven-release-manager-2.5-SNAPSHOT/maven-release-manager this is not correct ${project.artifactId}-archives/${project.artifactId}-${project.version} then scm:svn:https://svn.apache.org/rep

Re: git commit: fix site deploy for svnpubsub using site:stage with ${project.artifactId}-archives/${project.artifactId}-${project.version} will expand values in addition of parent so sucks for multi

2012-12-22 Thread Robert Scholte
ads/master fe5c0331b -> 67ecba8ab fix site deploy for svnpubsub using site:stage with ${project.artifactId}-archives/${project.artifactId}-${project.version} will expand values in addition of parent so sucks for multi modules projects. Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/maven-

Re: ${project.version}

2009-11-13 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
Great, thanks! On Nov 13, 2009, at 11:55 AM, Brian Fox wrote: In snapshots that used to be a problem but was fixed ~2.0.6ish. The properties aren't interpolated on deploy so it works ok. On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: A while back this would not have been a safe thi

Re: ${project.version}

2009-11-13 Thread Brian Fox
In snapshots that used to be a problem but was fixed ~2.0.6ish. The properties aren't interpolated on deploy so it works ok. On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > A while back this would not have been a safe thing to do.  Will this now > work correctly? > > > Regards, > Alan >

${project.version}

2009-11-13 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
A while back this would not have been a safe thing to do. Will this now work correctly? Regards, Alan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org