Hi
Rat now has a variety of components built using a variety of tools in
a variety of languages.We're looking to move to Apache CMS at the
project level, integrating Maven site builds into subversion. The
extension mechanism plugging subversion into wagon scm seems to be a
little buggy. Easier to
Hi Everyone :-)
Over in Rat-land[1] we've started working on Whisker, a tool to assist
assembled applications[2] with licensing wrangling based on a
licensing descriptor. As well as generating LICENSE, NOTICE (and - one
day - other licensing related materials), Whisker aims to validate
that each r
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 5:50 AM, Mark Derricutt wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I was thinking again the other day about how mixins could be introduced to
> maven to improve/fix some of the issues found with the rigid parent/child
> lineage of poms.
Maintaining common meta-data without mixin's is a major PI
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> go for it
+1
Robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> The vote on wagon only attracted two binding +1 votes. Now what? A new
>> vote, since this one is formally closed?
>
> The 72 hour waiting time is a minimum, you can certainly let
2011/7/11 Arnaud Héritier :
> Hi Robert,
>
> There is a problem of sync (I think) between xircles and Jira.
> I just added you manually in maven-developers group in Jira and I opened
> an issue on codehaus side (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/HAUS-2099)
I'm happy to use http://issues.apache.or
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:50 AM, Kasun Gajasinghe wrote:
>> On Jul 4, 2011, at 11:48 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>> > After many problems, I've now opted to uninstall the official Maven
>> > and Ant packages (and Eclipse...), and use instead a set of scri
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> look, what you are trying to do is move an object of infinite mass, keeping
> the lever length and force applied finite. good luck, it will be fun for us
> watching from the sidelines... fundamentally maven is about downloading
> dependenci
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> On Sunday, July 03, 2011 7:19:36 PM Benson Margulies wrote:
>> So, I'm a mostly a monkey here, but it seems very sensible to me.
>> Perhaps Dan Kulp would chime in?
>
> It sounds reasonable to me. I know I copied one of the transforms into CXF
A number of feature requests [1][2] could be implemented in an elegant
way by introducing an interface (ResourceMerger, say) similar to
ResourceTransformer. I'm happy to dive in and provide integration and
unit tests for this change, plus implementations for the requested
features if the consensus
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> I'm working now on an integration test for
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSHADE-94
Done
Robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apa
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> The problem I reported with svn was local to my checkout; my checkin
>> had succeeded.
>>
>> I've applied all the patches with tests
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> The problem I reported with svn was local to my checkout; my checkin
> had succeeded.
>
> I've applied all the patches with tests, and even written tests for
> two without tests. I've invited two others to provide tests, and
> there's one i
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I'll play patch monkey. Name those JIRA.
:-)
[1] patches the documentation to add descriptions for the resource
descriptors which worked well for me. Moving on to prepare test cases
and fixes for issues discovered.
Robert
[1] http://ji
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>> I'm looking for smart merger of NOTICEs and LICENSEs. How is this
>> currently implemented?
>
> For the NOTICE stuff, you can look at the
> org.apache.maven.plugins.shade.resource.ApacheNoticeResourceTransformer
> which several projects use
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I'll play patch monkey. Name those JIRA.
:-)
I've submitted a documentation patch [1] to let users know it exists.
I'm out of typing time now but I'll step up with some more later
today.
Robert
[1] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSE
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:47 AM, ant elder wrote:
> If you can mange to get some patches applied and a release of the
> shade plugin done that would be fantastic. MSHADE-88 for me and I've
> another fix to different scoped dependencies which i can submit if
> theres a chance someone might appl
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:52 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>> I think the shade plugin does something like this.
>
> Looks like it does...
I've submitted [1] a documentation patch to help users of assembly to
find
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> The JIRA count is not a reliable indication of anything. Lots of us
> use shade in production. The JIRA count can indicate a plethora of
> improvement suggestions, or a bunch of uninvestigated complaints.
True. That's why I spent a few m
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> The JIRA count is not a reliable indication of anything. Lots of us
> use shade in production. The JIRA count can indicate a plethora of
> improvement suggestions, or a bunch of uninvestigated complaints.
>
> Don't get me wrong, please do
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:52 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> I think the shade plugin does something like this.
Thanks
I've taken a look and this seems the right place to start but I'll
probably need to do some development...
There are 21 open issues [1] and (by my count) 8 patches (which are
probabl
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:52 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> I think the shade plugin does something like this.
Looks like it does...
Thanks :-)
Robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional comman
(If support for this use case already exists then apologies in advance
but I suspect it's not supported and that I'll need to hack some extra
code...)
specific use case:
assemble a jar containing all dependencies without losing legal meta-data
example:
LICENSE and NOTICE in META-INF must be pre
(Apoligies for allowing this to drifting off topic after I failed to
make my main point)
IMHO bait-and-switch licensing isn't something to panic about today
but better license management is something that Maven should think
about enabling. This would offer users protection from similar tactics
in
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> The legal risk involved in downloading and using a jar of code pushed
> to central under false pretenses is very small.
I live in the UK. That's now untrue here.
Robert
---
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:03 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
> None of this discussion is really relevant for this list... except maybe that
> pointing to a URL for a license in the POM is not a good idea.
This is really what I wanted to raise here (just a bit difficult
without context)
> If someone
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> just an idea: what about extending the maven-release-plugin to ask for a
> license if the pom doesn't contain a section?
In principle, this would be a good feature to add to a verification
tool like Rat.
In this case, JSW has a section
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> There's no such thing as a 'retroactive license change', though
> perhaps the Tanuki-person has managed a sufficient approximation. Is
> there?
IMO enough of a sufficient approximation to worry :-/
(more detail in line)
> Once upon a ti
(This is continuation of a thread from 2008[1]. It's now impacting the
release of Apache James 3. If the topic is too far OT please shout ;-)
The JSW artifacts in Maven Central [2] now seem to lack a public
license (in other words, a unilateral license allowing the public to
distribute and downlo
Hi
I'm taking a look at adding summary reporting to a plugin [1],
targeting maven 3. the plugin loads classes to introspect them, using
getCompileClasspathElements() from the project. This works ok in
non-aggregate mode and when the aggregate goal is called directly but
getCompileClasspathElements
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Brian Fox wrote:
>
> Ok, we'll cancel the oss.sonatype.org request, unless you still want
> us to host the repo for you. I left a comment on the upload request,
> we need the artifacts to be signed, everything else looks good.
cool
more generally, i know of a num
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
> ok create a "new project" issue here:
> https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/OSSRH and those interested in maintaining
> it can add a comment to the issue to get privs.
please take a quick look at
https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/OSSRH-39 and see
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
> If someone is interested in maintaining the poms and tracking their
> releases, we can set up a repository at oss.sonatype.org.
a lot of apache projects rely on bouncy castle releases for crypto.
i'd be willing to help maintain an off shore reposi
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
> For artifact checksums? They are not a security measure, so I don't think
> increasing their length is of benefit.
>
> Having read the same mail I'm guessing you did, it made me reflect and we
> probably should have kept using md5 for efficienc
just a heads up that maven may need to switch from SHA1 to SHA512 (or
higher). not sure how difficult that will be.
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mav
On 4/24/09, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> On 24-Apr-09, at 7:55 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Jason van Zyl
>> wrote:
>>> On 24-Apr-09, at 7:36 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>&
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> On 24-Apr-09, at 7:36 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Is sounds like the process used by our release plugin doesn't really
>>> match
>>> the way git works, so maybe we can change the
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Paul Gier wrote:
> Mark Struberg wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I thought in a similar direction. I think we can even let the maven-scm as
>> it is.
>> The problematic usecase is if we have a multi-module build and like to
>> release only one of the sub modules.
>>
>> John
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>
> +1 for moving to git.
>
> Jukka already mirrors a lot of projets on GitHub and there is already a
> git.apache.org domain too (not sure where this leads too).
>
> Jason is already convinced, but for all other sceptics:
> Basically the loca
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
> Ok I understand. The problem is for commercial products based on Eclipse. I
> forgot that.For plexus it's annoying but it mustn't be to difficult to
> solve. The number of committers is limited and the major part is in the
> maven's team.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jason's recently posted
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200902.mbox/%3cea7c752b-2f67-4329-b0c5-35ccff853...@sonatype.com%3e)
a warning about tightening up release verification. i think that this
is generally a good thing. i
On 8/6/08, Brian Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I said before, this was done by infra with no notice to us. The new
> policy of purging is theirs, not ours. See the infra archives if you
> would like to read about it.
It would be perfectly possible to publish long lived Milestones
provided th
On 7/23/08, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 22-Jul-08, at 8:55 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
>>
>> On 23/07/2008, at 4:23 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
On 7/23/08, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 22-Jul-08, at 8:55 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
>>
>> On 23/07/2008, at 4:23 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
On 7/23/08, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 23/07/2008, at 4:23 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've wanted to
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've wanted to pick up my work on this for some time and was prodded by the
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] threads to take another crack at this.
>
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Repository+Security (the issue and
> r
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In a discussion about LICENSE/NOTICE generation from maven remote resources
> plugin the result was a blocking issue in the pom content: there is no way
> to specify the copyright owner for a given artifact, it only allow
On 6/14/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 14 Jun 07, at 9:39 AM 14 Jun 07, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> that's what I understood too, source release is mandatory and
> binary optional
>
This is a throwback to HTTPD where a source distribution made more
sense because of platform issue
On 5/6/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6 May 07, at 9:30 AM 6 May 07, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> Just FYI:
>
> There's another thread going on on the general incubator list about
> where
> incubating maven artifacts should go:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-g
On 5/6/07, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday 06 May 2007 14:10, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> > I strongly encourage Maven experts to chime in and make their
> > opinions known.
>
> I already did the last time we had a vote. What was the result of
> that vote and where is there another po
On 3/13/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Who here will be at ApacheCon in May? I know Jason is as he is
speaking. Anyone want to get together there?
i'll be there over the queens day weekend as well as the conference
- robert
---
On 1/11/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11 Jan 07, at 3:42 PM 11 Jan 07, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 1/11/07, John Tolentino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Everyone,
>
> hi john
>
>> You can now generate release reports using th
On 1/11/07, John Tolentino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Robert,
Can you have a plexus component for the license header auditing then?
i think so but we may need to think about the best way to do it...
RAT's half way through a redesign ATM but i'll move that onto a branch :-/
I can hook it
On 1/11/07, John Tolentino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Was thinking of integrating both docck and rat plugins by calling
their execute() methods.
Docck throws a MojoFailureException when documentation tests fails and
test results could be redirected to a file through the output
parameter. So inte
On 1/11/07, John Tolentino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not yet. Still looking for existing maven plugins that might be doing
this already. Not sure if the verifier plugin could do this for us.
there's quite a few wrinkles to release auditing which aren't
immediately obvious
RAT code's rubbish (
On 1/11/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11 Jan 07, at 3:42 PM 11 Jan 07, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 1/11/07, John Tolentino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Everyone,
>
> hi john
>
>> You can now generate release reports using th
On 1/11/07, John Tolentino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Everyone,
hi john
You can now generate release reports using the maven-swizzle-plugin.
have you implemented your header checked yet?
i'm interested in collaborating on release auditing (in particular for apache)
- robert
--
On 12/22/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Steve Loughran wrote:
>> Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>>> Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 19 Dec 06, at 12:28 PM 19 Dec 06, Steve Loughran wrote:
> Jason van Zyl wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Just checking in with fol
On 12/21/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 12/20/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> robert burrell donkin wrote:
>> > On 12/19/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> robert
On 12/20/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> On 19 Dec 06, at 12:28 PM 19 Dec 06, Steve Loughran wrote:
>
>> Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> Just checking in with folks to see if anyone is planning ApacheCon
>>> talks.
>>
>> 1. "fear the repository police". We
On 12/20/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
just some holiday fun ahead...
On 12/20/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> We are
> >>
> >> 1. planning an apache con EU talk, "fear the repository police".
> >
> > in suitable costumes, i hope ;-)
>
> nothing planned, but if
On 12/20/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 12/19/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> robert burrell donkin wrote:
>> > On 12/19/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 2. looking t
On 12/19/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 12/19/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>> I'd like to see POM auditing in there somewhere.
>
> +1
>
> henri's been talking about adding
On 12/19/06, John Tolentino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Been working on a tool to generate reports for release candidates and
this is a mock of what it should look like:
http://people.apache.org/~jtolentino/release-reports/MockReport.html
We can send this generated page to the dev l
On 12/19/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to see POM auditing in there somewhere.
+1
henri's been talking about adding this to RAT. IMHO this should be
implemented as a separate component so that it could be used by a
variety of applications: for example, it might be i
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPJAR-51?page=comments#action_53446 ]
Robert Burrell Donkin commented on MPJAR-51:
+1
using major.minor is just what we need for the commons.
later versions of the jar specification
(http://java.sun.com/j2se
Burrell Donkin
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPJAR-7?rc=1 commented out code to set the
Specification-Version manifect attribute. There seems to have been quite a bit
of debate about that bug. The result seems to be that the code was commented
out
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/maven/maven-1
obert Burrell Donkin
It would be very useful to be able to specify which plugins (and versions) are
required by the build. Apache projects are starting to specify these
dependencies in the standard project dependency section. This is bad in the
long run since it leads to Maven reporting inacc
maven-classic.css obscures external linked URLs on MSIE
---
Key: MAVEN-1682
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVEN-1682
Project: Maven
Type: Bug
Environment: MSIE on windows
Reporter: Robert Burrell Donkin
[PATCH] typo
Key: MAVEN-1614
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVEN-1614
Project: maven
Type: Improvement
Components: documentation
Reporter: Robert Burrell Donkin
Priority: Trivial
Attachments: maven-typo
Typo in using/index
--
This
[PATCH] two plugin related FAQs
---
Key: MAVEN-1613
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVEN-1613
Project: maven
Type: Improvement
Components: documentation
Reporter: Robert Burrell Donkin
Priority: Trivial
Attachments
[PATCH] release documentation maven.compile.target
--
Key: MAVEN-1612
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVEN-1612
Project: maven
Type: Improvement
Components: documentation
Reporter: Robert Burrell Donkin
[PATCH] release documentation
--
Key: MAVEN-1611
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVEN-1611
Project: maven
Type: Improvement
Components: documentation
Reporter: Robert Burrell Donkin
Priority: Trivial
Attachments
On 13 Apr 2004, at 13:42, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 04:17, robert burrell donkin wrote:
i seems to recall hearing something a while ago (on the grapevine)
about a new policy for maven plugins. i have done a bit of searching
but haven't turned anything up. what's t
hi
JaxMe is the apache web-services JAXB-compatible xml-object binder.
IIRC the current maven JAXB plugin uses the sun stuff which comes with
a difficult license. i'd like to make available a jaxme-based plugin
(completely under AL2.0).
i seems to recall hearing something a while ago (on the g
On 6 Apr 2004, at 23:37, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 16:54, robert burrell donkin wrote:
IIRC the plan was to phase out betwixt but i see there's still a
dependency in the build and some references in the code. is betwixt
going to be used for the upcoming release (and if so,
IIRC the plan was to phase out betwixt but i see there's still a
dependency in the build and some references in the code. is betwixt
going to be used for the upcoming release (and if so, where)?
(i've made quite a lot of progress on betwixt over the last few months
and can probably look at some
you should be able to get the code you need from CVS - you just need to do
an export based on the release tags.
having said that, it might be worth investigating the amount of work that
would be required to patch up the plugin's. you might find it easier to
fix those and upgrade.
- robert
On
78 matches
Mail list logo
