+1 (binding)
Ralph
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 4:59 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hello,
> Note as stated here [1], this vote in order to pass need "A majority
> of the PMC".
> AFAIK, this PMC is 22 people [2] and currently there is only 8 * +1.
>
> Thanks!
> --
> Olivier Lamy
> Talend: http://coders.t
Rats - I should have looked at Jira before posting. I was thinking this was
the checkbox to accept the license.
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 3:23 PM, ralph.goers @dslextreme.com <
ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> The patch bit should be done away with. It would be much better to just
The patch bit should be done away with. It would be much better to just have
a statement that says everything contributed is under the Apache license
with a link to the license.
2011/5/26 Arnaud Héritier
> I don't remember which level of admin I have on this instance but if we
> want to allow to
I apologize if you get this twice. My ISP has been doing some work on their
email and it isn't quite working properly.
I'm confused how the build can continue without the parent pom. I wouldn't
call the behavior "inconsistent", I would call it completely indeterminate.
The parent plugin could have
