Re: [DISCUSSION] JEP 238: Multi-Version JAR Files

: > > > > > Le samedi 11 avril 2015 10:54:34 Kristian Rosenvold a écrit : > > > > >> IDE support for multiple source trees seems quite far off ? > > > > > > > > > > IDE support for current situation, where we mix multiple Java API > &

Re: [DISCUSSION] JEP 238: Multi-Version JAR Files

4-11 10:54 GMT+02:00 Kristian Rosenvold : > IDE support for multiple source trees seems quite far off ? > > Kristian > > > 2015-04-11 8:51 GMT+02:00 Hervé BOUTEMY : > > Hi, > > > > Yesterday at DevoxxFR, Carlos Sanchez, Arnaud Héritier, Nicolas de Loof > a

Re: fix wagon http lightweight

e have been lots of changes under the hood. > I'd not be surprised if they have also changed the logging. But would need > to check that. > > LieGrue, > strub > > --- On Sun, 8/28/11, nicolas de loof wrote: > > > From: nicolas de loof > > Subject: Re: fix w

Re: fix wagon http lightweight

can't we use slf4j to redirect such log to whatever logging system ? 2011/8/28 Olivier Lamy > Hello > Not so easy for core distrib due to commons-logging dependency which is > exclude. > > -- > Olivier > send from a mobile > Le 28 août 2011 10:05, "nicolas de

Re: fix wagon http lightweight

e this would mean that we should be ready to release 2 or 3 new > wagon + maven versions pretty quickly... > > LieGrue, > strub > > --- On Sun, 8/28/11, nicolas de loof wrote: > > > From: nicolas de loof > > Subject: Re: fix wagon http lightweight > &g

Re: fix wagon http lightweight

lightweight-http-wagon http-wagon could replace it 2011/8/28 Mark Struberg > Hi Nicolas! > > Not really sure what you are talking of. Which parts/versions do you like > to deprecate and which part of wagon-webdav got deprecated? > > LieGrue, > strub > > > --- On

Re: fix wagon http lightweight

applied to trunk (maven-2.x). The changes you did needs java5, but > wagon-1.x is still java-1.4 only. Switching to java5 is one of the main > difference between wagon-1.x and wagon-2.x > > The patch should pretty much apply without much changes. > > txs and LieGrue, > strub &g

Re: fix wagon http lightweight

I just can't get git svn to work and push my changes to wagon 1.x branch feel free to pick-up those changes if you like them 2011/8/24 nicolas de loof > I'm testing a fix for WAGON-346<http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WAGON-346> and > WAGON-347 <http://jira.code

fix wagon http lightweight

I'm testing a fix for WAGON-346 and WAGON-347 Before I commit anything to svn I'd like your advice : see https://github.com/ndeloof/maven-wagon/tree/wagon-1.x The idea to make LightWeightHttpWagon thread-safe d

Re: Improvement in wagon-http (use http connection pooling from ASF httpclient)

+1 to set this as default why use system properties to set this flag and not use a per-instance configuration ? 2011/8/24 Olivier Lamy > Hello Folks, > I have just loaded an issue [1] regarding an improvement for wagon > http (the wagon http which use asf httpclient). > This small improvement wi

Re: svn commit: r1127427 - /maven/sandbox/trunk/plexus-utils-commons-bridge/plexus-utils-tck/src/test/java/org/codehaus/plexus/util/Base64Test.java

Fun to know we will have to hack commons-io to backport plexus-utils bugs ;) 2011/5/25 Stephen Connolly > These were Nicolas' tests, but a good catch and I've made the change. > > BTW, the aim here is to reproduce the bugs for the first go... so if > Plexus Utils is incorrectly using platform en

Re: POM 4+ was Re: Moving forward with mixins

+1, simple and efficient 2011/5/24 Stephen Connolly > deploy new poms as poms with classifier > > new maven tries to download pom with classifier... fails and falls > back to pom without > > old maven only ever sees pom without classifier > > 2011/5/24 Arnaud Héritier : > > It doesn't seem so ea

Re: svn commit: r1127056 - in /maven/sandbox/trunk/plexus-utils-commons-bridge: ./ plexus-utils-commons-bridge/ plexus-utils-commons-bridge/src/main/java/org/codehaus/plexus/util/ plexus-utils-tck/src

> +assertEquals("dGVzdA==", new Base64().encode("test".getBytes())); > > assertThat with the matchers is far nicer, but if you like keeping it > old-style I'm fine with that! > > I'm not used with matchers (maybe I should be deprecated and replaced by some nicolas-update-bridge), can you pl

Re: POM 4+ was Re: Moving forward with mixins

> > I think doing some sort of on-the-fly translation into a 4.0.0 POM purely > to be deployed for backwards compat would be enough here...though we may > want to explore how we could make Maven smart enough to say, "I can't read > this POM, use a later version" or somesuch... > > Why only consider

Re: Anyone want to help?

Oups, moved to https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Plexus-utils+replacement 2011/5/24 Olivier Lamy > 2011/5/24 nicolas de loof : > >> > >> +1 and Nike it: Just do it(tm) > >> > > > > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Plex

Re: Anyone want to help?

> > +1 and Nike it: Just do it(tm) > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Plexus-utils+replacement

Re: Anyone want to help?

I'd be pleased to join, (let's drop this dinosaur) Should we setup a wiki page to know who is working on wich part, let contributors pick-up tasks, and trace progess ? Should we clone the svn repo to github / apache extras so that non-apache contributors can help (I'm an optimistic naive guy :P)

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.8

+1 2011/3/10 Olivier Lamy > +1 > > Thanks ! > -- > Olivier Lamy > http://twitter.com/olamy > http://www.linkedin.com/in/olamy > > 2011/3/9 Kristian Rosenvold : > > Hi, > > > > We solved 16 issues: > > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541&version=17039 > > > > The ab

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0.3

+1 Le 1 mars 2011 09:28, Arnaud Héritier a écrit : > +1 > > Arnaud > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Mark Derricutt wrote: > > > -1 non binding - I had that null version issue earlier. Now home and > will > > try to reproduce it with a currently nightly. > > > > > > > > -- > > "Great artists

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resources Plugin version 2.5

+1 2011/2/26 Hervé BOUTEMY > +1 > > Hervé > > Le jeudi 24 février 2011, Dennis Lundberg a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > We solved 5 issues: > > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11145&styleName= > > Html&version=16232 > > > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: How to compile code using maven

Don't consider Maven as a scripting engine Maven works based on conventions, and plugins use them to avoid configuration and scripting Don't try to override conventions as you do in compiler, war plugin. Follow them and discover how the plugins can naturaly run in your build without anything to co

Re: [PROPOSAL] Auto-Mirror Selection for Maven 3.x

I really like this feature suggest, and it would be a must-have if also backported to maven2 ! Having to maintain mirroring based on declared repositories ID is a pain, especially when transitive dependencies pull multiple IDs for the same repo URL. From your schema, it seems the routing rules are

Re: svn commit: r1069599 - /maven/pom/trunk/asf/pom.xml

2011/2/11 Jesse Farinacci > Hi, > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:58 AM, nicolas de loof > wrote: > > It does, since version 2.3, but the version set by super-pom is more > > conservative > > Maybe you suggested Apache POM should set a recent compiler plu

Re: svn commit: r1069599 - /maven/pom/trunk/asf/pom.xml

> > > By that logic, which I happen to agree with, then shouldn't the > compiler plugin start using 1.5 by default then? > It does, since version 2.3, but the version set by super-pom is more conservative Maybe you suggested Apache POM should set a recent compiler plugin version ? Nicolas > > -

Re: Create a enforcer-incubator-rules project (was:Re: MENFORCER-19 (enforce dependencyManagement))

a requirement that every mojo that fails a build be rolled into > > the enforcer plugin. Failing that, you'd have to pull all the logic > > out into a shared component. > > > > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 8:16 AM, nicolas de loof > > wrote: > > > Hi folks, >

MENFORCER-19 (enforce dependencyManagement)

Hi folks, I'd like to work on MENFORCER-19, org.apache.maven.plugin.dependency.AnalyzeDepMgt has all the necessary code to create an EnforcerRule "EnforceDependencyManagement", but I wonder how we should manage such code duplication. Copy/paste some hundred lines from dependency plugin into enforc

Re: '+1' vs 'I agree'

2011/1/26 John Casey > > Apologies if my addition to the veto thread was what touched this off. :-) > It was a combination of using a phone for email for the first time (yes, I > know, I must be some kind of Luddite), I also sent my first mail from my first web-enabled mobile phone yesterday -

Re: Invite Evgeny Mandrikov to join Maven committers

+1 Le 26 janv. 2011 09:40, "Arnaud Héritier" a écrit : > > +1 > > Arnaud > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Lukas Theussl wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > -Lukas > > > > > > > > Olivier Lamy wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> I propose Evgeny Mandrikov as a new committer. > >> He as done a lot of patches f

Re: svn commit: r1062210 - /maven/maven-3/trunk/pom.xml

Can I suggest that such debate moves to the PMC list ? Not sure discussion about licensing and in/out hosting of core components should occur here 2011/1/25 Jason van Zyl > > On Jan 25, 2011, at 11:03 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > > > On 25 January 2011 15:47, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > > >> On

Re: Regarding maven 3 integration with Hudson

take a look at Olivier blog about maven3 support on hudson http://olamy.blogspot.com/ 2010/12/15 amit pugalia > Hi, > > I'm facing issues when using Maven 3 with latest build of Hudson. > The maven plugin doesn't seem to be compatible with Maven 3. > It throws errors as, > > > C:\hudson1\home\pl

Re: Use of standards in the Maven core

I may be wrong regarding maven3-core, but AFAIK most code (including some plugins) related to POM parsing use Xpp3Reader, as we don't provide an abstraction API for POM parsing. Such a migration to JAXB (or other), without consideration to the technical beneficts, would require a compatibility laye

Re: [ANN] Apache Maven 3.0 Released

aren't "software" and "late" some sort of synonyms ? 2010/10/8 Jason van Zyl > A week late, but better then most of my predictions :-) > > On Oct 8, 2010, at 9:59 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > > > Thanks god, this didn't become a new Perl 6 ... :-) > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0

+1, works fine for me Nicolas 2010/10/4 Greg Akins > +1 > > Ran against all my projects successfully > > On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Benjamin Bentmann > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware > of > > any major regression so let's try

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Site Plugin 3.0-beta-2 for maven 3

Link to migration doc on index page is wrong "/#migrate.html, should be /migrate.html) 2010/9/5 Tony Chemit > +1 > > Le Sat, 4 Sep 2010 23:06:51 +0200, > Olivier Lamy a écrit : > > > Hi, > > We solved 2 issues : > > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11146&version=1669

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Compiler Plugin 2.3.2

+1 Nicolas 2010/9/5 Tony Chemit > +1 > > Le Sat, 04 Sep 2010 16:21:50 +0200, > Benjamin Bentmann a écrit : > > > Hi, > > > > We solved 1 issue: > > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11130&version=16731 > > > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > > > htt

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

+1 (non binding) works fine with gwt-maven plugin 2010/9/2 Hervé BOUTEMY > +1 > > Hervé > > Le lundi 30 août 2010, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here > > we go! > > > > Apart from another few regression fixes, this

Re: Fwd: maven3 embedder

just use the HPPT (not "S") url http://svn.sonatype.org/spice/trunk/maven-performance-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/performance/tests/p001/P001EmbedderTest.java 2010/8/10 Steffen Stundzig > hi, > > thanks igor. For the second I need a login. Do you have a guest account > or something else

Re: Aether questions answered for JAX

Do you plan to also use Aether for Provisio ? I read at http://www.scribd.com/doc/29909925/Managing-Run-Times-With-Proviso that it uses P2 for provisioning, but this may be outdated Cheers, Nicolas 2010/8/9 Jason van Zyl > Some more public information for those interested in Aether: > > http://

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Site Plugin 3.0-beta-1 for maven 3

+1 (non binding) Nicolas 2010/8/7 Olivier Lamy > Hi, > In order to have a good companion to the coming Apache Maven 3.0-beta-2 > release. > I'd like to release Maven Site Plugin 3.0-beta-1 for maven 3. > We solved 10 issues : > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11146&v

Re: Merging in our Aether and Guice changes to Maven 3.x

Could it be supported by a JSR ? Not a lightweight process, even considering JSR-330 was out after 6 month, but the most agnostic way to group community efforts. Aether could then be proposed as RI 2010/8/4 John Casey > On 8/4/10 10:39 AM, nicolas de loof wrote: > >> Ivy G

Re: Merging in our Aether and Guice changes to Maven 3.x

Ivy Guys could be interested in such a "neutral" repository API, as they also support both m2 and proprietary repo format. 2010/8/4 John Casey > On 8/3/10 2:21 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We have two major pieces that we, Sonatype, would like to merge into Maven >> 3.x trunk. >> >> T

Re: Merging in our Aether and Guice changes to Maven 3.x

> > > > I have always had concerns about plexus being pretty much only adopted by > > Maven as far as I can see, and essentially being a maven core component, > > except it isn't > > +1 > > Guice allready as its own large community of users and maintainers. > It's a general 'purpose' API. > > Aethe

issue using properties in dependencies

Hi, I just was warned about a strange behaviour in dependency resolution. Having 3 projets A, B, C C creates an artifact with a classifier, beeing configured as a user setting "env" property (using jar-plugin classifier parameter). Running mvn install on C creates C-1-.jar B has a dependency on

Re: [MDEP-269] please review

> nexus-maven-plugin, not the maven-dependency-plugin. > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 8:39 AM, nicolas de loof > wrote: > > I tried to write an alternate implementation of MDEP-269 using nexus > indexer > > API, based on samples found on sonatype blog. > > > > I

Re: [MDEP-269] please review

> > I get an error when running the indexUpdater > : java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: > org.eclipse.jetty.client.security.Authorization - I can't find a dependency > to this eclipse plugin in nexus-indexer POM.xml > > > This one is solved, I wasn't looking at the correct POM :-/ sory Nicolas

Re: [MDEP-269] please review

please close the issue. > > Note: In issue above MD5 hashes are mentioned, but MD5 is not supported > anymore, not on index. Only SHA1 hashes are. > > Thanks, > ~t~ > > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:35 PM, nicolas de loof > wrote: > > > I discussed with the author of a

Re: [MDEP-269] please review

2010/6/18 Tamás Cservenák > I don't get it, what do you mean by "repository index generated by Nexus > ... > doesn't include the artifact hash"? > > What makes you think hash is not on the index? > > Thanks, > ~t~ > > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:52 AM

[MDEP-269] please review

Hi folks, I'm working on MDEP-269 - convert a legacy lib/*.jar to maven I've attached a patch to Jira as I'd like your opinion on the way to support this use case. My patch uses Nexus REST API to query the repository manager for artifacts based on local

Re: Maven3 with guice was Re: Maven 3 tests

I built and used it also on few projects without any issue, including some custom plugins I'm +1 to switch to Guice, just a note : as Spice uses a modified Guice release, with patch proposed to Guice SVN, should we wait for a new Guice release with those changes included ? 2010/6/9 Olivier Lamy

Re: svn commit: r950989 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-checkstyle-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/checkstyle/DefaultCheckstyleExecutor.java

+1 to remove this "feature". A module is expected to build either with it's parent POM in parent directory or by donwloading it from repo, so relying on such * search-in-parent-folder* feature is a bad practice. Nicolas 2010/6/3 Olivier Lamy > Hi, > We are two who don't like this hack :-) > So

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Site Plugin version 2.1.1

+1 Le 3 juin 2010 10:52, Arnaud Héritier a écrit : > +1 > > Arnaud Héritier > eXo - Software Factory Manager > > > > On Jun 3, 2010, at 9:59 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > > > +1 > > > > 2010/5/31 Dennis Lundberg : > >> Hi, > >> > >> We solved 7-8 issues (I'm not sure if MSITE-440 is resolved or not)

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Doxia and Maven Doxia Site Tools version 1.1.3

+1 2010/5/25 Lukas Theussl > > +1 *2! > > -Lukas > > > Dennis Lundberg wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> To allow Maven Site Plugin 2.1.1 to be released, I'd like to release >> Doxia 1.1.3. >> >> We solved 10+1 issues: >> >> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10780&version=15924 >> >

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Antrun plugin version 1.4

+1 Le 25 mai 2010 10:11, Arnaud Héritier a écrit : > +1 > > On May 25, 2010, at 4:20 AM, Paul Gier wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We solved 13 issues: > > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11125&version=14641 > > > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > > > htt

dependency plugin vs dependency report

Hi, I just noticed the dependency report has (at page end) a list of dependencies with the repo ID they where retreived from I wonder if the maven-dependency-plugin could also display such (usefull IMHO) info using a new "outputRepository" parameter Cheers, Nicolas

Re: Concurrency in m3 - a status report

What about adding such concurrency metadata aside plugin artifact in local repository, either by extending metadata.xml or using a new concurrency-metadata.xml file ? In such case users/repo maintainers could easily "tag" plugin as (not) beeing thread-safe 2010/4/26 Stephen Connolly > On 26 Apr

Re: Concurrency in m3 - a status report

> > > The issue is http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4642, and as an > alternative solution we could > simply make a list somewhere that blacklists/whitelists/greylists plugins, > as long as there's a reasonable > way to update such a list. Maybe something enforcer-like; > > org.codehaus.plexus:p

Re: Concurrency in m3 - a status report

> > Plugins > = > I have only managed to find "real" concurrency problems in the EAR > plugin and modello as of yet. Modello is fixed in trunk, ear is > not started AFIK. > > All the other stuff I've seen in the core plugins relate to the > plexus-issues. > > Our jira issue is from a user w

Re: Re : MNG-4483

+1 for .mvn and backward compatibility with .m2 if not found 2010/4/22 Julien HENRY > +1 > > > > - Message d'origine > > De : Paul Benedict > > À : Maven Developers List > > Envoyé le : Jeu 22 avril 2010, 17 h 14 min 15 s > > Objet : MNG-4483 > > > > 3.0-beta-1 being a beta release, i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

+1 works fine on my test-projects 2010/4/22 Igor Fedorenko > +1 > > Works for Tycho (although I had to fix a couple of sloppy tests) and few > our internal projects I work on. > > -- > Regards, > Igor > > Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We solved 39 issues: >> >> http://jira.codehaus.or

Re: MRELEASE-261 - regression ?

done http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-546 2010/4/13 Deng Ching > Hi Nicolas, > > Please open a new one, note it as a regression and link it to MRELEASE-261 > to avoid problems in the fix versions :) > > Thanks, > Deng > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:04

MRELEASE-261 - regression ?

Hi I get some regressions with maven-release-plugin related to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-261 Here is a testCase to demonstrate the issue. This is the same testCase as the existing one BUT the parent project is not first one in the reactor project list public void testGetComm

Re: m3// and plugins with improper singleton handling

Do we have any top-level jira for thread-safety and // build issues ? I myself got failures in // build with AspectJ plugin 2010/4/12 Kristian Rosenvold > I found the bug in the modello plugin that was breaking /any/ build using > modello in multi-modules; and I'm fairly sure the same kind of is

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Compiler Plugin 2.3

Cool ! +1 2010/4/11 Jason van Zyl > On Apr 11, 2010, at 2:02 AM, nicolas de loof wrote: > > > Will this change be supported in m2eclipse ? I mean : will m2e detect the > > maven-compiler-plugin 2.3+ version and set JRE1.5 classpath container ? > > > > Configurator

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Compiler Plugin 2.3

Will this change be supported in m2eclipse ? I mean : will m2e detect the maven-compiler-plugin 2.3+ version and set JRE1.5 classpath container ? 2010/4/10 Stephen Connolly > +1 > > Sent from my [rhymes with tryPod] ;-) > > On 10 Apr 2010, at 12:40, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > Hi, >> >> This was

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Compiler Plugin 2.2

+1 2010/4/1 > +1 > > > Hi, > > > > We solved 6 issues: > > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11130&version=16097 > > > > Staging repo: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-00< > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-008/> > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-7

+1 Still partisant of a "milestone" naming convention to avoid assumptions on code quality and stability. 2010/3/10 Olivier Lamy > +1 (IMHO we could change the name to at least beta as it works really > fine :-) ). > > 2010/3/9 Benjamin Bentmann : > > Hi, > > > > We solved 22 issues: > > > http

Re: annotations support in compiler mojo

Would such a dedicated plugin only apply annotation processing or replace compiler plugin ? This may implies duplicate configuration for compiler + annotation-processing plugins. Also consider slower build process as javac will need to parse source code 2 times. (late) +1 for annotations support i

Re: [VOTE] Release MavenCheckstyle plugin version 2.5

+1 2010/2/8 Olivier Lamy > Hi, > I'd like to release maven-checkstyle-plugin version 2.5. > It's a small release to make it working with maven 3. > > We solved 1 issue: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHECKSTYLE-123 > > Staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/mave

Re: Maven 3 alpha status

could we use "milestone" as names in replacement for "alpha", so that we get more early-adopter to test the (pre)release and detected regressions ? I can understand the difficulty to suggest a build tool with "alpha" in version name. Would you install Windows 8 alpha on your @work computer ? ;) 2

Re: [VOTE] Release Surefire 2.5 (take 3)

+1 Nicolas 2010/1/16 Hervé BOUTEMY > +1 > > Hervé > > Le mercredi 13 janvier 2010, Stephen Connolly a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > We solved 16 issues: > > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541&version=14 > > 119&styleName=Html > > > > There are still a couple of issues

Re: Releasing maven-eclipse-plugin

Same issue on my project using m2eclipse <= 0.9.8 0.9.9 introduce many improvements that makes m2eclipse compliant with large multi-modules projets Nicolas 2010/1/14 Daniel Kulp > > > Can we at least get a snapshot staged with your changes so I can double > check > that it doesn't break the CX

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Clean Plugin 2.4

+1 Nicolas 2010/1/14 Vincent Siveton > +1 > > Vincent > > 2010/1/10 Benjamin Bentmann : > > Hi, > > > > We solved 2 issues: > > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11128&version=14882 > > > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > > > http://jira.codehaus.or

Re: [VOTE] Release Surefire 2.5 (take 3)

+1 Nicolas 2010/1/13 Kristian Rosenvold > +1 > > Nice work dealing with all the trouble yesterday. > > Kristian > > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Stephen Connolly < > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We solved 16 issues: > > > > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Re

Re: maven-gwt-plugin 1.2 documentation

; > In the doc reference to the gwt-maven-plugin are still to 1.1. > > > > 2010/1/11 nicolas de loof : > > This doc is up-to-date. > > > > the 1.2 version is not dedicated to gwt 2.0, it just support this version > as > > GWT >= 1.4 > > > > 20

Re: maven-gwt-plugin 1.2 documentation

This doc is up-to-date. the 1.2 version is not dedicated to gwt 2.0, it just support this version as GWT >= 1.4 2010/1/11 Henri Gomez > Hi to all, > > I'll do some GWT 2.0.x application and get a look at > > http://mojo.codehaus.org/gwt-maven-plugin/ > > The documentation is still mainly for pl

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Compiler plugin version 2.1

links in left menu are all broken, maybe this is just a staging issue Cheers, Nicolas 2009/12/30 Stephen Connolly > Hi, > > We solved 11 issues: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11130&version=12304&styleName=Html > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: m3 alpha 5 feedback

right, I'll setup a simplified demo project 2009/12/2 Benjamin Bentmann > nicolas de loof wrote: > > Maven 2.2.1 deploys fine with same POM >> > > Then please fill an issue with a demo project. > > > > Benjamin > > --

Re: m3 alpha 5 feedback

Maven 2.2.1 deploys fine with same POM 2009/12/2 Benjamin Bentmann > nicolas de loof wrote: > > I'm using maven3-alpha-5 and get a deploy:deploy error on >> people.apache.org (maybe related to MNG-4241 ?) >> >> [INFO] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal >>

m3 alpha 5 feedback

Hi, I'm using maven3-alpha-5 and get a deploy:deploy error on people.apache.org (maybe related to MNG-4241 ?) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-deploy-plugin:2.4:deploy (default-deploy) @ fonzie --- [INFO] WAGON_VERSION: 1.0-beta-2 [INFO] [INFO] -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-5

+1 2009/11/23 Arnaud HERITIER > +1 > > Arnaud Héritier > Software Factory Manager > eXo platform - http://www.exoplatform.com > --- > http://www.aheritier.net > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > On 2009-11-23, at 11:33 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Checkstyle plugin version 2.4

+1 2009/11/12 Mark Hobson > Hi, > > The big new feature in this release is an upgrade to Checkstyle 5.0, > which brings Java 5 compatibility. > > We solved 6 issues: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11127&version=15336 > > There are still a couple of issues left in

Re: devoxx?

I do, 5 days Nicolas 2009/11/3 Stephane Nicoll > Hey guys, > > Who's coming at the devoxx conference this year? > > _o/ > > S. > > -- > Large Systems Suck: This rule is 100% transitive. If you build one, you > suck" -- S.Yegge >

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Plugin Tools 2.5.1

+1 Welcome Qdox update needed for better Java5 support (some generics issues ...) 2009/10/4 Benjamin Bentmann > Hi, > > We solved 10 issues: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=15018&styleName=Html&projectId=11139 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > >

schema for plugins and assisted POM edition

Just found this article http://blog.springfuse.com/2009/09/better-way-to-handle-maven-plugin.html on maven plugin configuration using a dedicated XML schema. This could be a nice enhancement to plugin-tools to generate an XML schema for mojos parameters as part of the plugin site, to help POM editi

Re: [vote] Invite Stephen Connolly to join Maven committers

+1 Nicolas 2009/9/7 Hervé BOUTEMY > +1 > > Hervé > > Le lundi 07 septembre 2009, Arnaud HERITIER a écrit : > > Hi all, > > I'd like to propose giving commit access to Stephen Connolly. > > He is already a committer @ Mojo for many monthes and did a great work > on > > several plugins. > >

deploy on apache.snapshots ?

Hi, I'd like to migrate commons-monitoring to use the new plexus-based apache.snapshots I can login to this instance with my apache ID, but can't deploy with this setup : apache.snapshots https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots Did I missed something ? Cheer

Re: [VOTE] Commit access for Igor Fedorenko

+1 2009/7/29 Brian Fox > +1 > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Jason van Zyl > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Igor has been submitting patches for over a year now and in the last 12 > > weeks he's been submitting some very substantive changes to 3.x. > > > > Igor has done things like create a performa

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Javadoc plugin version 2.6

+1 2009/7/26 Vincent Siveton > 2009/7/26, Karl Heinz Marbaise : > > http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-javadoc-plugin-2.6/ > > > > > this links results in "Page not found"... > > You need to wait for the sync or to use the asf proxy. > > Cheers, > > Vincent > > --

Re: Removal of old-school reactor mode from Maven 3.x

Sure, this sounds like a ugly hack now we have a far clever wat to select modules to be built +1 for deprecation 2009/7/24 Benjamin Bentmann > Hi, > > Maven 2.x supports a CLI like > > mvn -r -D maven.reactor.includes=... -D maven.reactor.excludes=... > > to select sub directories of the curren

URGENT spam on jira

Can a Jira guru disable "ouigon8423" account that is creating SPAM issues : [jira] Created: (MBUILDHELPER-13)

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Remote Resources Plugin version 1.0.1

+1 2009/7/21 Arnaud HERITIER > +1 > Cheers, > > Arnaud > > # Arnaud Héritier > # Software Factory Manager > # eXo Platform > # http://www.exoplatform.com > # http://blog.aheritier.net > > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Jason van Zyl > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > This is a maintenance release o

Re: Stop support for legacy repository layout in 3.x

Legacy layout is still used at http://download.java.net/maven/1/ by some project, including some standard Java API (activation, mail, persistence...) can we expect them to migrate to http://download.java.net/maven/2/ ? Maybe some evangelism / lobbying could help ;) A repo manager can safely conver

Re: proposal for cleaning up 2.x series releases / trees

t;> months, and probably won't trust it. They'll need critical bug support >>> on >>> 2.0. We just need a window for migration, that's all. >>> >>> cheers, >>> Christian. >>> >>> On Jun 30, 2009, at 9:52 AM, nicolas de lo

Re: proposal for cleaning up 2.x series releases / trees

Brett Porter wrote: - remove the 2.1.1 version from JIRA and remove the 2.1.x SVN branch - > +1 - promote the 2.2.0 as the stable release on the site and push all bugfix > work towards 2.2.x > +1 - a 2.0.11 release to get those sticking to 2.0.x the 37 fixes already > committed there. > +1 -

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Fourth Attempt)

+1Nicolas 2009/6/29 Lukas Theussl > > +1 > > -Lukas > > John Casey wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I've resolved the issue with plexus-interpolation, reverified the ITs, and >> restaged the release. The URLs below have been updated. Let's see if we can >> get through this vote without further interruption

Re: [VOTE] Maven Wagon 1.0-beta-6

+1, let's have (yet another) milestone before a 1.0 final if this is usefull to release maven 2.2.0 2009/6/26 Benjamin Bentmann > John Casey wrote: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-011/ >> > > +1 > > > Benjamin > >

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-pdf-plugin version 1.0

Link to the staging site is wrong, it has been deployed on http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-pdf-plugin/ Cheers, Nicolas 2009/6/25 Lukas Theussl > > Hi, > > We solved 11 issues since the plugin was promoted from the sandbox: > > http://jira

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-pdf-plugin version 1.0

+1 nice work ! any chance you create a maven-msword-plugin now ? :) 2009/6/25 Lukas Theussl > > Hi, > > We solved 11 issues since the plugin was promoted from the sandbox: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11932&styleName=Html&version=15118 > > There are still a cou

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

Just as a side note, I don't thing the wiki page http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Maven+2.2.0+Release+Plan is up to date with current release candidate, is it ? Nicolas 2009/6/22 John Casey > I've added this sort of configuration, but I need to document it. I've got > a proposed next relea

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

+1 2009/6/18 Daniel Kulp > > +1 > > Tested with CXF and some of the profiles that don't work correctly with > 2.1.0 > work fine with 2.2.0. > > Dan > > > On Wed June 17 2009 8:50:02 pm John Casey wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm opening a new vote for Maven 2.2.0 after closing: > > > > http://jira.cod

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >