Re: Speeding up Maven

2018-04-18 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Just make sure you're not running low on entropy on your linux box, all sorts of weird slowdowns happen then. https://major.io/2007/07/01/check-available-entropy-in-linux/ Kristian 2018-04-16 11:28 GMT+02:00 Mark Raynsford : > With absolutely impeccable timing, I've had a coupl

Re: Questions about how to contribute to Plexus

2016-09-01 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I will take a look at your interpolation pr's this weekend unless someone picks it up before. Kristian 2016-09-01 0:46 GMT+02:00 Gabriel Belingueres : > Hi Robert: > > Regarding Plexus components, I created a couple of pull requests on > plexus-interpolator (and some relate

Re: [SUREFIRE] Surefire provider for JUnit 5?

2016-08-27 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Hi, Benedikt :) JUnit 5 provider is cool, yes please :) Providers have different language levels (the different modules have different language levels), and I am sure we can build with jdk8. jdk8 still supports the target 1.6, right ? Kristian 2016-08-27 11:23 GMT+02:00 Benedikt Ritter

Re: Contributing to Apache Maven

2016-06-30 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Just to be clear about this; only actual committers on the project are allowed to assign an issue to themselves. If you want to fix an issue you will just need to attach a patch to the jira or a pull request. Kristian 2016-06-30 12:30 GMT+02:00 Stian Soiland-Reyes : > If you have registered

Re: Maven Memory Consumption

2016-05-31 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
atter what...) Kristian 1. jun. 2016 12.15 a.m. skrev "Karl Heinz Marbaise" : > Hi, > > tested without the patch (-Xmx6g) ...run time for the test project more > than two 2 Minutes > > running with the patch (-Xmx1g): > > Run time ca. 27 seconds... > > also work

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shade Plugin version 2.4.3

2016-01-08 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 2016-01-07 18:59 GMT+01:00 Tibor Digana : > `+1 > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Tibor Digana-2 [via Maven] < > ml-node+s40175n5858080...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We solved 4 issues: > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317921&version=

Re: migrating Surefire to 3.0-RC1

2016-01-08 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I would recommend that you instead update the existing wiki page that we use to gather "tips" about migrating plugins: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Plugin+migration+to+Maven3+dependencies Kristian 2016-01-08 1:18 GMT+01:00 Tibor Digana : > Hi Andreas, >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.19.1 - TAKE 2

2015-12-31 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Verify does not work with surefire. K 31. des. 2015 15.52 skrev "Karl Heinz Marbaise" : > Hi Tibor, > > i have tried to test with Maven 3.0.5 via mvn -Prun-its clean verify and > got the following message: > > [INFO] > > [IN

Re: Retiring Maven Skins

2015-12-24 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Yes! +2 2015-12-24 11:03 GMT+01:00 : > yes, that's a good cleanup > > Regards, > > Hervé > > - Mail original - > De: "Michael Osipov" <1983-01...@gmx.net> > À: dev@maven.apache.org > Envoyé: Mercredi 23 Décembre 2015 21:30:28 > Objet: Retiring Maven Skins > > Hi folks, > > Hervé is quite

Automating upload(commit) to "dist" area ?

2015-12-24 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Is there any way we can do this to avoid manual steps in the release process ? K

Re: to delete windows build ?

2015-12-18 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Hervé > > Le vendredi 18 décembre 2015 07:53:19 Kristian Rosenvold a écrit : > > As long as shade is not released and updated it will probably come back. > > > > I actually checked all the plugins for file leaks and there were no other > > leaks in the code that was

Re: to delete windows build ?

2015-12-17 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
hade-p leaks: in such > > conditions, > > now that leaks are fixed, yes, let's just remove the code (or fix the > > plugin if > > another leak is found later) > > > > Regards, > > > > Hervé > > > > Le samedi 21 novembre 2015 15:13:15 K

Re: [DISCUSS] Java version requirement for Mavan 3.4.x

2015-12-14 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
practical point of view, it's slightly inconvenient to be the only project requiring jdk8 (but someone has to be first, so...) But initially it should be only the new provider with an upped language level. Kristian 2015-12-14 21:41 GMT+01:00 Andreas Gudian : > > JUnit 4 End Of Life &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Java version requirement for Mavan 3.4.x

2015-12-02 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
that's quite some time off. Stephen's comments about overall tool support for 1.6 is probably the most important thing here. I suspect the length of our stay on 1.6 minimum for plugins will be very very short. So I'd say move core to 1.8 and all plugins to 1.7 in 6 months time. Kristian

Re: [DISCUSS] Java version requirement for Mavan 3.4.x

2015-11-30 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
t enough. If we are to stay aligned with current practice, jdk8 should be a minor release. As for the actual topic of "should" we switch, i'm always in favour of moving forwards. But not in any religious sense. Kristian 2015-12-01 6:59 GMT+01:00 Mirko Friedenhagen : > +1

Re: Why can't dependency plugin "see" statics /and staticimports

2015-11-26 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
What I still dont understand is; the string might be inlined, but the "import" still seems to be visible in the bytecode. Shouldn't dependency:analyze consider this a "usage" ? Kristian 2015-11-25 10:31 GMT+01:00 Stephen Connolly : > Well here's a how do you do

Re: Why can't dependency plugin "see" statics /and staticimports

2015-11-25 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
t pool for the BarMain class. The dependency analyzer does not seem to catch this. I'm a bit of a n00b in this regard, anyone have any tips on how to do this ? Kristian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Why can't dependency plugin "see" statics /and staticimports

2015-11-24 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
ut.println("AZ " + Test2.AZAZ); } } Isn't this possible to detect or am I just a total n00b with asm ?? Kristian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: to delete windows build ?

2015-11-21 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I just fixed all of these leaks to use deterministic closing of all resources, so nothing gets closed in finalizers any more. To my understanding these calls to System.gc and any kind of retry logic can just be removed. So IMI it's a no-brainer, but sometimes there's more history behind

Re: to delete windows build ?

2015-11-21 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
like to remove, since the root cause in all likelyhood is fixed: For instance this; https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/xref/org/apache/maven/plugins/shade/mojo/ShadeMojo.html#L643 Any objections ? Kristian 5. nov. 2015 5.29 p.m. skrev "Tibor Digana" : > Thi

Re: Shade plugin from directories instead of jars in multimodule builds ?

2015-11-15 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Yeah, I sort of understand. But that really means there is no "good" use case for letting shade read classes from target/classes within the reactor(?) Kristian 2015-11-14 20:15 GMT+01:00 Igor Fedorenko : > Run the build with -X and see what mojos are executed for mshade171-b

Re: Shade plugin from directories instead of jars in multimodule builds ?

2015-11-14 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
ase is the plugin bound to in your project? > > -- > Regards, > Igor > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2015, at 06:45 AM, Robert Scholte wrote: >> Op Sat, 14 Nov 2015 11:53:41 +0100 schreef Kristian Rosenvold >> : >> >> > While working on MSHADE-171, I figured

Shade plugin from directories instead of jars in multimodule builds ?

2015-11-14 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
ust do "mvn clean package" it resolves to the jar file. I'm probably the last guy to realize this, but this patch is a dead end, right ? So we should probably just make shade a little more verbose about what's going on; that we actually require a jar file ? Kristian -

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.9

2015-11-12 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 2015-11-10 18:16 GMT+01:00 Jason van Zyl : > Hi, > > Time to release Maven 3.3.9! > > Here is a link to the issues resolved: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316922&version=12333074 > > Staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.8

2015-11-02 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Amazing flute section ! ROFL :) K 2015-11-02 23:46 GMT+01:00 Jason van Zyl : > One more time > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ry4ngf766N0 > > > On Nov 2, 2015, at 7:26 AM, Stephen Connolly < > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Well I was asked to remove the quick and dirty chec

Re: to delete windows build ?

2015-10-25 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Based on code review I found a large number of close-statements that were not in the mandated finally blocks, which would create resource leakage on kill. I fixed this in bb99b232da0e93f2772be6945a410ea9ba666c4f, hope this will help the situation on windows. Kristian 2015-10-23 17:26 GMT+02:00

Fwd: to delete windows build ?

2015-10-22 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
#x27;s the equivalent of kill -9 we're in trouble no matter what, but usually some softer means is used first) I'll montor for resurce leaks while killing processes this weekend to see if I can find anything. Kristian -- Forwarded message -- From: Tibor Digana Date: 201

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.19 (Take 2)

2015-10-18 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 2015-10-18 10:48 GMT+02:00 Hervé BOUTEMY : > +1 > (I don't know how I checked this release with its checksum but voted on the > wrong thread... but for sure, I'm voting on the second take only :) ) > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le jeudi 15 octobre 2015 03:48:00 Tibor Digana a écrit : >> Hi, >> >>

Re: Maven Core Branch Cleanup

2015-10-12 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Anyone wishing to retain these branches can just go ahead and fork the girhub repo, they' 2015-10-12 20:20 GMT+02:00 Jason van Zyl : > You can nuke all my branches. They are either integrated, irrelevant, or easy > to recreate. > >> On Oct 12, 2015, at 2:11 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: >> >> H

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven maven-plugin parent-pom version 28

2015-10-11 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 11. okt. 2015 2.56 a.m. skrev "Benson Margulies" : > Hi, > > 2 changes in JIRA. Many other commits. > > > ** Bug > * [MPOM-88] - yyy-LATEST deployment URL breaks site parent reference > menu > * [MPOM-89] - Unbalanced versions of Maven Invoker Plugin > > There are no pending issues I ca

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.19

2015-10-09 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
unterminated JVM using > non-daemon Threads in tests. > I will cancel the Vote, delete the staging repo and tag. I will test the > plugin in another real project and I will make improvements. > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Kristian Rosenvold < > kristian.rosenv...@gmail.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.19

2015-10-08 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I identified the commit that caused the breakage, cb97ba70cb9ebe685f8f2a06e87b538795b5dd9b. I dont have further time to find the bug right now, but I suspect this should be enough to find the problem. Kristian 2015-10-08 19:09 GMT+02:00 Kristian Rosenvold : > I created ht

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.19

2015-10-08 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
process ? We'll continue in the jira. I'm definitely -1 on this release until we can sort this out. Kristian 2015-10-08 18:54 GMT+02:00 Kristian Rosenvold : > 2015-10-08 16:55 GMT+02:00 Tibor Digana : >> @Kristian >> Can we switch to other mail thread "surefire 2.19

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.19

2015-10-08 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
2015-10-08 16:55 GMT+02:00 Tibor Digana : > @Kristian > Can we switch to other mail thread "surefire 2.19 hangs". I dont necessarily think this is a good idea. We are discussing a candidate for a release, and I believe this is the appropriate place to discuss these matters, since

Re: surefire 2.19 hangs

2015-10-08 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
This was on linux. I'll try to diagnose later tonight K 8. okt. 2015 5.32 p.m. skrev "Arnaud Héritier" : > When I was using windows I remember that unlocked was my friend : > http://www.emptyloop.com/unlocker/ > Maybe there are others tools nowadays … > The most important is to see which proc

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Assembly Plugin version 2.6

2015-10-08 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 2015-10-06 15:41 GMT+02:00 Benson Margulies : > Hi, > > We solved 1 issues: > > ** New Feature > * [MASSEMBLY-780] - Snappy supported > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MASSEMBLY-782?jql=project%20%3D%20MASSEMBLY%20AND%20status%20%

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.19

2015-10-08 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Upgrading maven core to 2.19 ( https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/maven.git) consistently hangs on org.apache.maven.artifact.handler.ArtifactHandlerTest, this works on 2.18. So I'm -1 until we can find out what's happening... Kristian 2015-10-08 10:47 GMT+02:00 Karl Hein

Re: Maven and JDK requirements in Surefire

2015-10-08 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Just for building 2015-10-08 9:24 GMT+02:00 Anders Hammar : > Ok, just to build or to use as well? > > 'prerequisites' is for usage. maven-enforcer-plugin with > requireMavenVersion=[3.0.5,) is for building. > > /Anders > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Kris

Re: Maven and JDK requirements in Surefire

2015-10-08 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Surefire requires 3.0.5 to build, due to bugs in earlier versions. Kristian 2015-10-08 9:04 GMT+02:00 Anders Hammar : > Why 3.0.5? > > We've had this discussion (in general for plugins) before and IIRC we > decided on 3.0. > > /Anders > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.19

2015-10-07 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Looking at the change it applies only to a single IT for a specific type of environment setting; are you keeping this vote open or respinning ? (Personally I think it's ok to keep it open if I understand it right) Kristian 2015-10-07 22:35 GMT+02:00 Tibor Digana : > Yesterday I clar

Re: Releasing the assembly plugin

2015-10-06 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
f assembly should be the way to go. If someone wants to do the work to switch to the maven-artifact-transfer methods (and probably gain full 3.0 compatibility instead of current 3.0.4), it might be a good way to achieve full checklist-driven development. Kristian 2015-10-06 8:29 GMT+02:00 Ander

Re: [VOTE] Retire Maven Eclipse Plugin / Donation to Mojohaus

2015-10-06 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 retire it 4. okt. 2015 11.19 a.m. skrev "Robert Scholte" : > Hi, > > during the latest upgrade of the plugin-parent I faced several issues with > the maven-eclipse-plugin. > It will take quite some time to fix these issues, but is it worth > maintaining it here? > Nowadays the Maven support for

Re: Releasing the assembly plugin

2015-10-05 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
no matter what. Kristian 2015-10-05 2:47 GMT+02:00 Benson Margulies : > I have my itch scratched on the 2.6 branch. If anyone else wants to > pull something else onto the branch before I release 2.6.0, please > speak up. > > On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Benson Margulies

Re: Full migration to Git

2015-10-02 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
This did not go well. I was able to get a full backup of asf svn up on my server, but unfortunately git-svn barfed on it. So I suppose some heavy filter-branching over the current git-svn clones is the only way to go, Kristian 2015-09-30 2:28 GMT+02:00 Barrie Treloar : > On 3 June 2015 at 18

Re: FOSDEM 2016

2015-09-28 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Jan 30-31 is in the prime skiing season. No can do :) Kristian 2015-09-27 22:25 GMT+02:00 Arnaud Héritier : > I think that Jenkins will be here too, thus I hope to have the opportunity > to come > > On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Robert Scholte > wrote: > >> Hi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Parent POM version 27

2015-09-21 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 2015-09-21 13:21 GMT+02:00 Olivier Lamy : > +1 > > On 21 September 2015 at 07:06, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We solved 13 issues: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311250&version=12329010 >> >> Changes since the last release: >> >> http://svn.apa

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Utils version 0.9 - TAKE 2

2015-09-20 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 2015-09-17 22:12 GMT+02:00 Tibor Digana : > Hi, > > We solved 4 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922&version=12332813 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MSHARED%20AND%20

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Utils version 0.9

2015-09-16 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
t; milestone >> in Jira and migrate these three issues we solved in 0.9. > > Why using 0.10 ? The release can be dropped from Nexus, cause it's a staged > release ...and make Take 2 of the 0.9 release..? > > Kind regards > Karl Heinz Marbaise > >> @Kristian Shall

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Utils version 0.9

2015-09-16 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
The problem is that ignoring the tests will still fail as long as you run the release on windows. I'll try to fix the testcases tonight. Kristian 2015-09-16 9:37 GMT+02:00 Tibor Digana : > I see ASF builds pass on Linux, but I am using Win with Java 5. > That's the reason wh

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Utils version 0.9

2015-09-16 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
will be ok) I assume the file https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/shared/trunk/src/test/resources/symlinks/src/symR does not become anything symlink-like when you check it out of svn on windows ? Kristian 2015-09-16 8:45 GMT+02:00 Karl Heinz Marbaise : > Hi Tibor, > > based on t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Utils version 0.9

2015-09-15 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 Note that I also added https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHARED-436 as fixed to the release, increasing the issues to 4. Kristian 2015-09-15 23:22 GMT+02:00 Tibor Digana : > Hi, > > We solved 3 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=1231

Read timeout from repository ?

2015-08-13 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
t;get" request at all ? (As Arnaud comments in the issue, it would appear to have been introduced somewhere after 3.1.1) Kristian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-m

Interleaving forks/tests

2015-07-25 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
resource conflicts, since no user code has yet been run. We'd certainly be using a little more resources, but it should be nothing out of the ordinary? WDYT ? Am I missing something ? Kristian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.5

2015-07-23 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
project that is "different" from the ones I am testing, and I'd really need a test project to find out what. Kristian 2015-07-23 15:58 GMT+02:00 Jörg Schaible : > Jörg Schaible wrote: > >> Hi Anton, >> >> Anton Tanasenko wrote: >> >>> Hi Jörg,

Re: Intend to release maven-assembly-plugin 3.0.0

2015-07-18 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
based filtering, creating > temporary files with extensions > > but Kristian fixed the filtering by switching from File based filtering to > Reader > based filtering for maven-assembly-plugin 2.5.1 > > Thank you Kristian :) > > I then removed the exclusions without any f

Re: Intend to release maven-assembly-plugin 3.0.0

2015-07-17 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
We were discussing which version to use for core dependencies. Assembly plugin will not be 3.0 unless you do it yourself. Kristian 2015-07-16 22:18 GMT+02:00 Robert Scholte : > The reason why you're not sure of the exact version explains why we ended > up with simply 3.0 :)

Re: Intend to release maven-assembly-plugin 3.0.0

2015-07-14 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Well I suppose you're right. The wiki document does not represent formal project policy anyway. Kristian 2015-07-14 21:58 GMT+02:00 Robert Scholte : > I'd say as much as possible. I'm completely aware that not all can be > removed, but a move from 2.x ot 3.x is THE mo

Re: Intend to release maven-assembly-plugin 3.0.0

2015-07-14 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
14. jul. 2015 21.04 skrev "Robert Scholte" mvn clean verify -Prun-its -Dinvoker.mavenHome=d:\apache-maven-3.0 fails on my machine > We are 3.0.3/4/5 minimum, which I believe is in accordance with our discussions. Cant remember exactly which versjon though :)

Re: Intend to release maven-assembly-plugin 3.0.0

2015-07-14 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
ot a code change, so I cant veto it. But it's as silly as it gets. I thought o.a.m.plugins was /supposed/ to be there, at least that's what I renamed everything to ? Kristian 2015-07-14 21:03 GMT+02:00 Robert Scholte : > Op Tue, 14 Jul 2015 20:46:50 +0200 schreef Krist

Re: Intend to release maven-assembly-plugin 3.0.0

2015-07-14 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
move. Kristian 2015-07-14 19:13 GMT+02:00 Karl Heinz Marbaise : > Hi Benson, > > I have taken a look and i see only a small change which is very good idea > to do so, but which means the upgrade to 3.0.0 does not make sense. > > An update to 3.0.0 indicates very important things to

Re: Intend to release maven-assembly-plugin 3.0.0

2015-07-14 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
sions, but I did this before your shared code had any features related to this. I also believe it has most of the cleanup done. Did you have anything particular in mind ? Kristian

Apache infrastructure and java6; https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDS-85

2015-07-07 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Fyi: This seems to be the cause of our current grief on jenkins builds. Kristian

Re: JAR/WAR file wasting memory if building with Maven

2015-07-06 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Note that the memory leak was fixed in 2.10.3 in https://github.com/codehaus-plexus/plexus-archiver/issues/6 . Issues #5 which Igor mentioned may or may not be the same problem. (Btw 3.x has not yet received this fix...) K 2015-07-02 23:25 GMT+02:00 Igor Fedorenko : > Maybe related > https:/

Re: svn commit: r1686969 - /maven/pom/trunk/maven/pom.xml

2015-06-23 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Welcome ! K 2015-06-23 8:16 GMT+02:00 Hervé BOUTEMY : > Welcome Manfred! > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le mardi 23 juin 2015 05:30:37 mmo...@apache.org a écrit : > > Author: mmoser > > Date: Tue Jun 23 05:30:37 2015 > > New Revision: 1686969 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1686969 > > Log: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Verifier Component version 1.6

2015-06-21 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 21. jun. 2015 21.14 skrev "Tibor Digana" : > Hi, > > We solved 4 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922&version=12331401 > > There is still one issue left in JIRA: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MSHARED%20AND%20resol

Re: [jira] [Commented] (MINVOKER-187) Cloned IT project must be writable

2015-06-19 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I am a bit surprised the proposed fix does the trick; I thought perforce checked out *every file* read only ? Kristian 2015-06-19 17:22 GMT+02:00 Karl Heinz Marbaise (JIRA) : > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINVOKER

Re: Broken build on maven-shared-utils

2015-06-17 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I fixed the root cause by upgrading assembly-plugin to 2.5.5 in r1686055, which includes proper symlinks in the zip. Did you make an issue for this ? Kristian 2015-06-17 15:10 GMT+02:00 Tibor Digana : > Under some unknown conditions the build fails on tests maven-shared-utils > with c

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Utils version 0.8

2015-06-17 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 This has probably been released a couple of times already in this state, so my 2NOK is just to make an issue. Kristian 2015-06-17 13:29 GMT+02:00 Tibor Digana : > I would report a bug in 0.9 assign it to me and continue the vote. > I believe you had such issue, but I trust the comma

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Utils version 0.8

2015-06-17 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
It's because the symlinks dont get packaged properly as a symlink inside source-jar. This is probably because an old version of maven-assembly-plugin has been used when building the source-jar Kristian 2015-06-17 10:09 GMT+02:00 Karl Heinz Marbaise : > Hi Tibor, > > i have a

Does maven-artifact-transfer really need to use reflection ?

2015-06-14 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
As long as each class is either sonatype-aether or eclipse-aether, it does not really need reflection ? K

Re: svn commit: r1685226 - in /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-assembly-plugin/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/assembly/artifact/ test/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/assembly/archive/phase/ test/java/o

2015-06-13 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Cool. I suppose not much other stuff uses that anyway :) K 2015-06-13 22:22 GMT+02:00 Robert Scholte : > Hervé already worked on the graph-stuff. It's part of the shared > maven-dependency-tree. > > Robert > > Op Sat, 13 Jun 2015 22:02:44 +0200 schreef Kristian Rosenv

Re: svn commit: r1685226 - in /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-assembly-plugin/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/assembly/artifact/ test/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/assembly/archive/phase/ test/java/o

2015-06-13 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
maven-artifact-transfer) that uses its own api + the eclipse aether api. I assume it's safe to load the eclipse aether api inside maven 3.0.x ? Kristian 2015-06-13 21:01 GMT+02:00 Robert Scholte : > There's no release yet, so we're even free to change/rename > classes/methods

Re: svn commit: r1685226 - in /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-assembly-plugin/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/assembly/artifact/ test/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/assembly/archive/phase/ test/java/o

2015-06-13 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
clude "download") or create a separate project for aether-neutral download/resolution of artifacts, containing stuff like my code from http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=r1685177 I dont have any idea of how much of this is spread all over the place already... Kristian

Re: Unable to Update to DOXIA 1.6 (latest)

2015-06-10 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I generally try to avoid more than 2, but hey - time to break records ! Kristian 2015-06-10 13:02 GMT+02:00 Stephen Connolly : > The only issue is if there is a problem in one of the projects then you may > need to respin all four... if you frame your vote email so that you can > re

Re: MANIFEST Handling in maven-jar-plugin / maven-archiver / plexus-archiver

2015-06-07 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
The sections should be preserved though, so that's definitely a bug. K 2015-06-07 19:17 GMT+02:00 Robert Scholte : > The following attributes are very handsome to be able to reproduce a build > based on sources > > Built-By: kama > Build-Jdk: 1.7.0_21 > Created-By: Apache Maven 3.1.1 > Archiver

Re: MANIFEST Handling in maven-jar-plugin / maven-archiver / plexus-archiver

2015-06-07 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
S; if you cannot add a class-path element to the manifest then ? You're wrong. Kristian 2015-06-07 19:09 GMT+02:00 Karl Heinz Marbaise : > Hi Igor, > > > On 6/7/15 6:57 PM, Igor Fedorenko wrote: > >> If I provide custom jar manifest, I expect the manifest to

Re: MANIFEST Handling in maven-jar-plugin / maven-archiver / plexus-archiver

2015-06-07 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
support ordering. I have been trying to decide for myself if we're mostly talking about people scratching their OCD and theoretical use cases here. To this date I have yet to see anything that really convinces me otherwise. Kristian 2015-06-07 18:57 GMT+02:00 Igor Fedorenko : > If I provi

Re: 3.0 versions in branches ?

2015-06-07 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
And I appreciate your work a lot. I've got the assembly-plugin migration in github and I'll just land that right on trunk once I'm happy with it. Kristian 2015-06-07 17:35 GMT+02:00 Robert Scholte : > Hi, > > I've made those branches to see how much work it is to

3.0 versions in branches ?

2015-06-07 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Do we really need to keep the 3.0 versions in branches ? Can't we just make a branch if we need to fix something in the 2.x range ? Kristian

[ANN] Apache Maven Assembly Plugin 2.5.5 Released

2015-06-05 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache Maven Assembly Plugin, version 2.5.5 The Assembly Plugin for Maven is primarily intended to allow users to aggregate the project output along with its dependencies, modules, site documentation, and other files into a single dis

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Assembly Plugin version 2.5.5

2015-06-04 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 2015-06-01 7:06 GMT+02:00 Kristian Rosenvold : > I'll re-publish the site tonight (vote stays open). > > Kristian > > > 2015-05-31 21:42 GMT+02:00 Karl Heinz Marbaise : > >> Hi Kristian, >> >> checked SHA1 Ok. >> >> Checked wi

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Maven Assembly Plugin version 2.5.5

2015-06-04 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Jason, Karl, Kristian +1 (non binding): none. I will promote the artifacts to the central repo and continue the release

Re: Full migration to Git

2015-06-03 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
FYI; I am setting up a full copy of asf svn (just 65GB) and will be trying some imports once this is ready Kristian 2015-06-02 0:39 GMT+02:00 Chris Graham : > > > Sent from my iPad > > > On 2 Jun 2015, at 12:16 am, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > > > I think we hav

Re: Full migration to Git

2015-06-01 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
someone has to do :) Kristian 2015-06-01 17:12 GMT+02:00 Jason van Zyl : > I wasn’t but that’s good. If you wanted to run the clone again is that an > issue? We just figure out the best way and then do it to all of them. > > > On Jun 1, 2015, at 10:48 AM, Kristian Rosenvold &l

Re: Full migration to Git

2015-06-01 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
You're probably aware the I have done a substantial number of git migrations. Hopefully someone out there has a simple way to fix this problem; If I was to do this I'd probably re-run the initial git svn clone from the SVN repository... Kristian 2015-06-01 16:40 GMT+02:00 Jason van Z

Re: Full migration to Git

2015-06-01 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
git clone https://github.com/apache/maven-plugins.git cd maven-plugins ls -al git checkout maven-shade-plugin-2.2 ls -al The root gets rewritten on the tags. Not nice. Mojo did not have this issue. Kristian 2015-06-01 16:27 GMT+02:00 Kristian Rosenvold : > No, the maven-plugins repo i

Re: Full migration to Git

2015-06-01 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
nd how this has been translated to git in the current git svn close. Mojo did not have this problem. Try this: git clone https://github.com/apache/maven-plugins.git Kristian 2015-06-01 16:16 GMT+02:00 Jason van Zyl : > I think we have that PoC with Mojo moving to Github no? Baptiste, was this >

Re: Full migration to Git

2015-06-01 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
this operation like you suggest, we really need a proof of concept filtering first. Kristian 2015-06-01 14:06 GMT+02:00 Jason van Zyl : > Maybe it best then to have everything mirrored to Git, if there are any > repos that are not. Turn off SVN and do any partitioning once everything is &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Assembly Plugin version 2.5.5

2015-05-31 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I'll re-publish the site tonight (vote stays open). Kristian 2015-05-31 21:42 GMT+02:00 Karl Heinz Marbaise : > Hi Kristian, > > checked SHA1 Ok. > > Checked with Maven 2.2.1, 3.0.5, 3.2.5, 3.3.3 > without any issue... > > so +1 from me... > > on the

Re: Releasing entire maven-shared as a single release ?

2015-05-31 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
5-31 20:24 GMT+02:00 Mirko Friedenhagen : > Hello Kristian, > > sorry for asking, could you be more specific: > - Should they all go to a common staging repository, so testing them > together is easier. > - Should there only be one vote process? > > What does combined mean f

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven Assembly Plugin version 2.5.5

2015-05-31 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Hi, We solved 3 issues:https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12332381&styleName=Text&projectId=12317220 This release fixes a somewhat nasty regression in 2.5.4 when creating jar files. Still 2.2.1 jdk 1.5 compatible. There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:https

Re: Releasing entire maven-shared as a single release ?

2015-05-31 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
hink putting components that have their > > own unique lifecycle into their its own repository is more the direction > we > > need to go in. Grouping everything together and releasing them together I > > believe runs counter to having a good separation of concerns in

Releasing entire maven-shared as a single release ?

2015-05-30 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I've been wondering if we should just give every component in maven-shared the same version number and always release all of the modules at the same time ? (this would influence an upcoming git migration....) Kristian

codehaus-plexus google group

2015-05-29 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Known for its immensely agreeable traffic levels, this is the new google group for plexus :) https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/codehaus-plexus Kristian

Re: Full migration to Git

2015-05-29 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I really dont even know how to use svn any more, so it's just irritating. All git is the way to go. K 2015-05-29 19:08 GMT+02:00 Manfred Moser : > I would love that... if I can avoid relearning more SVN I am all for it ;-) > > manfred > > Stephen Connolly wrote on 29.05.2015 07:56: > > > +1 for

Re: logging during multithreaded builds

2015-05-27 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
s issue. As for the actual question of logger implementations, I prefer trivial problems like trying to determine that P=NP. Kristian 2015-05-28 8:39 GMT+02:00 Anders Hammar : > I agree with Jason, it would be better to keep this outside of core (the > core distro). > > /Anders >

Re: [VOTE] Add Manfred Moser as committer

2015-05-13 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 13. mai 2015 8.55 a.m. skrev "Hervé BOUTEMY" : > Hi, > > I'd like to introduce Manfred Moser as committer for the Apache Maven > project. > > He's working on Android Maven plugin for years, has great discussions both > on > users and dev MLs, has a great attitude. > And he's just told he wants

Re: IDEA licenses for Maven committers

2015-05-12 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
It would appear there's a limit to the number of licenses: This invitation for *IntelliJ IDEA* by *Jason van Zyl* cannot be accepted. No assets left. Kristian 2015-05-12 13:20 GMT+02:00 Jason van Zyl : > Maven committers, > > Jetbrains has graciously provided a project wi

Re: [VOTE] Maven Site upgrade to maven-fluido-skin 1.4

2015-05-09 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 9. mai 2015 09.15 skrev "Karl Heinz Marbaise" : > Hi, > > here is my +1.. > > at least one more binding VOTEs... > > Kind regards > Karl Heinz Marbaise > On 5/7/15 7:59 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> i would like to update our main page http://maven.apache.org/ to the new >> Mave

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Fluido Skin Version 1.4 (Take 2)

2015-05-06 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 6. mai 2015 6.57 p.m. skrev "Karl Heinz Marbaise" : > Hi, > > i need two more binding VOTEs... > > > Kind regards > Karl Heinz Marbaise > On 5/3/15 8:57 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We solved 10 issues: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=1231

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >