Re: versioning

On 19 Dec 2006, at 17:50, Kenney Westerhof wrote: Hi, ir. ing. Jan Dockx wrote: Well, your schema does follow the Java standard (java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/versioning/spec/ versioning2.html#wp89936>). That might be a good default. Maven could apply a strategy pattern to allow

Re: versioning

Well, your schema does follow the Java standard (). That might be a good default. Maven could apply a strategy pattern to allow for other versioning schemes. Only 3 functions are needed, as far as I can see:

Re: versioning

r than the corresponding number of the supplied string the method returns true. If the number is less than it returns false. If the corresponding numbers are equal the next number is examined. That shouldn't be a problem... On 12/19/06, ir. ing. Jan Dockx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I belie

Re: versioning

I believe that Maven version number support should at least make it possible to apply the specification / implementation version numbering scheme that is part of the Java standard (java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/versioning/spec/ versioning2.html#wp89936>). On 19 Dec 2006, at 9:33, [EM

Re: [m2] New pre-package phase?

On 4 Dec 2006, at 16:51, Jason van Zyl wrote: On 4 Dec 06, at 9:59 AM 4 Dec 06, Ralph Goers wrote: Richard, I love this idea and hate it at the same time. The idea of using numbers, as I'm sure has been pointed out before, just seems awful. But I understand what you are driving at. If

Re: [m2] New pre-package phase?

On 4 Dec 2006, at 14:08, Richard van der Hoff wrote: Brett Porter wrote: Actually, before we jump into this, let's consider the use case at hand. While easily solved by pre-package at this point, we may find other needs. To take these suggestions even further, perhaps the idea of a fixed

Re: Eclipse plugin disambiguation

No, what he is asking is: "could somebody please explain calmly and clearly to me what the status is of support for Maven inside eclipse ". Which eclipse plugins are available, which should I use, which are defunct, and where are they really (the project, the source, the eclipse update site

Re: Releasing Maven 2.0.5

Not a developer, but a quick question on the topic: aren't these fixes for a large part in plugins, and not in the core? (As a user, hooray for the release schedule, BTW). On 2 Nov 2006, at 15:26, Wendell Beckwith wrote: I'm all +1 for more frequent releases too. However, this issue goes

alphaWorks : IBM Secure Shell Library for Java : Overview

alphaWorks : IBM Secure Shell Library for Java : Overview Any chance that this will be released under an OSS license? Candidate for Wagon? Or are the ssh problems with jsch fixed in the mean time? Met vriendelijke groeten, Jan Dockx PeopleWare NV - Head Office Cdt.Weynsstraat 85 B-2660 Hobok