-1
I saw no benefit cited to going to 21, only implicit new constraints to users
I just saw the logic we used to skip 11 and go to 17 reused because we did not
ship 4.0 yet
I prefer shipping 4.0 with constraints people expected for 4.0 during the
release candidates: we'll see on next releases
On 2025/02/06 08:25:44 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 at 08:56, Hervé Boutemy wrote:
> >
> > can we work on scaling the Jira to GH Issues first before diving into all
> > the
>
> What do you think about "scaling the Jira to GH Issues"?
where we are
https://cwiki.apache.org/conf
;t know why it did not happen in this migration
@Benjamin any idea?
>
> Le mer. 5 févr. 2025 à 08:23, Herve Boutemy a écrit :
>
> > if we don't copy, we can't search in one place: I'm often searching in
> > issues to get why we did something in the past
if we don't copy, we can't search in one place: I'm often searching in issues
to get why we did something in the past (that years later looks strange, but
history helps understand)
I'd love to let some time to try before admitting we can't keep it simple in
one single place once migrated
Regar
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/11/02 20:42:57 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 46 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317926&version=12354045
>
> There are still a couple of issues
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/10/29 09:50:40 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> This Resolver 2.0.3, respin 1 release is a bugfix release with several
> improvements as well.
>
> This release contains two important bug fixes regard
+1
Reproducible Builds near fully ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
the only small difference in my rebuild is the aggregate CycloneDX SBOM: I
don't know how you did, but in the reference files, if contains hash for the
plugin, which is supposed not to be built yet, hence in my reb
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 11 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/10/30 17:01:56 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 6 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317529&version=12355245
>
> There are still a couple of issues
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/10/25 16:00:21 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> NOTE: Read the details on this release here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Towards+Doxia+2.0.0+Stack
>
> we solved 3 issues:
> http
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix (and Maven 3)
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/10/25 06:17:45 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 13 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317122&version=12355155
>
> There are still a
here is my +1
yes, RB ok
for those interested, once released, rebuild will be done by a GitHub Action
and added to
https://github.com/jvm-repo-rebuild/reproducible-central/blob/master/content/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-artifact-plugin/README.md
yes, I don't rebuild any more on my own laptop
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/10/15 18:28:22 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 51 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922&version=12354043
>
> There are still a couple of issues l
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/10/14 20:48:19 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> This Resolver 2.0.2 release is a bugfix release with several
> improvements as well.
>
> Maven 4.x is picking up Resolver 2.x, while Maven 3.x remains a
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/10/12 19:48:50 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 69 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922&version=12354042
>
> There are still a couple of issues l
in each
> test looks odd if it is part of the repo itself, I always has seen this
> more as some kind of compatibility-test-kit that can be used independent
> of maven itself.
>
>
> Am 09.10.24 um 08:33 schrieb Herve Boutemy:
> > I understand how it adds complexity
>
I understand how it adds complexity
AFAIK, the interest of having a separate project of core ITs is to clear state
the Maven core version range for each test, to clearly document when things
were introduced / broken / fixed and even be able to run HEAD ITs against a
past release
is it the only
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/10/06 18:49:26 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 107 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317320&version=12354040
>
> There are still a couple of issues left i
> Does Maven Central show a broken URL due to some wrong assumption about
> variable substitution
yes, it seems it does not resolve effective POM but just displays immediate
build pom.xml content (ignoring inheritance and interpolation)
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/10/05 13:10:45 Gary Gregory wrote:
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 21 and Maven 4 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/10/04 17:13:49 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 4 issue:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922&version=12354753
>
> There are still a coup
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/10/01 15:38:25 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 25 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922&version=12354041
>
> There is one issue left in JIRA:
> h
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
for easy Reproducible Builds check command, see instructions at the end of
section
https://maven.apache.org/developers/release/maven-project-release-procedure.html#call-the-vote
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/09/28 18:09:00 Michael
+1
Reproducible Build fully ok this time: reference build done with JDK 8 on
Windows
thank you Michael
Hervé
On 2024/09/28 17:27:19 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 3 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317529&version=12355065
>
> There are s
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/09/26 09:34:28 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 3 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317926&version=12355133
>
> There are still a couple of issues le
+1
Reproducible Build not fully ok: reference build done on Windows with JDK 11
issue found in CycloneDX SBOM, that list wrong hashes of plexus-utils 4.0.2
(b3f486796c6bc4fcb625a083b0e4698ca35b0f19 instead of
9526a9548b302572f23337fcc217fb4cc713b9c3 from Maven Central)
cleaning local cache, reb
SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is perfect for Linux distributions, that do their own
distro-specific packages (.rpm, .deb, .apk, ...) from the upstream project by
adding some patches and some packaging instructions
=> having a general way to inject its own choice of timestamp through a
standardized environme
> So just to be clear, what is the really the end goal of enabling it by
> default? I know the advantages and benefits, but what would be the goal of
> having this opt-out instead of having it opt-in?
if you just build without adding any configuration nor any special (or old)
plugin, you'll get R
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/09/24 13:08:47 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> This issue fixes a lingering issue in the whole 3.2.x lineage, that
> resulted in "bad passphrase" on Windows OS with GPG signer.
>
> We solved 3 issues
> Or is the idea to have a *fixed* *default* timestamp for all builds?
yes, this is the idea: there is no other option I can imagine to get a
reproducible zip entries timestamp, whatever the precise value of the timestamp
it is
If anybody has any other algorithm idea (that supports wide reality
+1
great work, thank you Slawek
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/09/22 21:48:05 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 36 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317122&version=12351178
>
> Ther
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference binaries done with JDK 21 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/09/11 20:08:54 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> We solved 6 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317523&version=12354926
>
> There are still some issues in J
+1
thanks for the quick respin
this time, Reproducible Build fully ok: reference build done on *nix with JDK 21
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/09/11 07:27:32 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> respin #1 changes the staging repository, as my local repository
> contained some rogue Maven binaries (as r
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 22 on *nix
notice that using a LTS JDK for releases would be a good practice for easier
future rebuilds
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/08/20 21:49:24 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 16 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/sec
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/08/18 18:52:01 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> NOTE: Read the details on this release here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Towards+Doxia+2.0.0+Stack
>
> we solved 2 issues:
> http
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/08/18 19:12:34 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> NOTE: Read the details on this release here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Towards+Doxia+2.0.0+Stack
>
> we solved 3 issues:
> http
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/08/18 18:40:11 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> NOTE: Read the details on this release here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Towards+Doxia+2.0.0+Stack
>
> we solved 3 issues:
> http
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
side note: when rebuilt with "-DskipTests",
maven-checkstyle-plugin-3.5.0-source-release.zip output misses 2 files
available in reference =
maven-checkstyle-plugin-3.5.0/src/test/resources/plugin-configs/target/test-harness/c
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/08/19 15:34:43 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> NOTE: Read the details on this release here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Towards+Doxia+2.0.0+Stack
>
> we solved 4 issues:
> http
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/08/18 19:00:54 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> NOTE: Read the details on this release here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Towards+Doxia+2.0.0+Stack
>
> we solved 4 issues:
> http
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: build done with JDK 21 and Maven 4.0.0-beta-3 on
everything but maven-compiler-plugin where Maven 3 was used
this explains why maven-compiler-plugin documentation is not broken :)
notice that build poms *-build.pom were not checked, I'll need to improve
artifact:compar
near all documentations are broken, in general missing reports menu, half using
wrong skin
I don't know the root cause, but it's strange
if we do the release, I'd ask to not replace the current documentation with
these beta ones: keeping versioned in -archive is ok
I hope maintenance of these
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done on Windows with JDK 8
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/06/02 15:20:38 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 4 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317522&version=12353019
>
> There are still a couple of issues le
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done on Windows with JDK 8
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/06/02 14:48:44 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 5 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317223&version=12353877
>
> There are still a couple of issues le
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done on Windows with JDK 8
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/06/01 19:57:44 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 5 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922&version=12353160
>
> There are no issues left in JIRA:
> h
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done on Windows with JDK 8
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/06/01 20:50:56 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 2 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317527&version=12354463
>
> There are still a couple of issues le
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
notice that it is ok when rebuilding from source-release.zip, but rebuilding
from Git gave me different source-release.zip because I'm not building from
Windows
If someone can rebuild from Git on a Windows host and confirm the
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/04/29 21:51:30 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 4 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922&version=12354488
>
> There are no more issues left in J
it's part of the wider Maven Ecosystem Cleanup plan
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Maven+Ecosystem+Cleanup
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/04/30 00:01:57 Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi,
> I can see plenty of PRs with maven-compat removal.
> Maybe this could be explained and so more people co
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows with umask
022 (parent POM not upgraded)
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/04/26 14:51:35 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 2 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922&version=1235409
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/04/26 10:38:51 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> We solved 3 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317228&version=12354128
>
> There are still a couple of issue
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/04/26 12:21:16 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Note: This is the last alpha release, next one will be beta-1. This version
> is to be picked up by Maven 4 beta-1. It contains 2 important bug fixes a
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/04/26 10:38:49 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> We solved 5 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317524&version=12353548
>
> There are still a couple of issue
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/04/26 11:00:32 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Note: Maven Resolver 1.x lineage is in "bugfix only" maintenance mode.
>
> This Resolver 1.9.20 release is a bugfix release: A behaviour change
> intro
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference done with JDK 8 on Windows and umask 022
(parent POM not upgraded)
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/04/23 19:03:06 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 12 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317320&version=12354412
>
> T
here is my +1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 17 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/04/20 15:54:37 Hervé Boutemy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 3 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317921&version=12354342&styleName=Text
>
> Staging repo:
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on *nix
FTR: I'm quite happy this release benefits from 2 improvements injected into
latest parent POM:
1. with latest maven-source-plugin, umask does not impact he result any more
2. with latest plugin-tools, we have an automatic plugin
here is my +1
Reproducible Build ok: reference done with JDK 11 on *nix umask 002
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/03/29 07:04:07 Hervé Boutemy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 4 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12324322&version=12353681&styleName=Text
>
> Staging re
here is my +1
Reproducible Build ok: reference done with JDK 11 on *nix, umask 002
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/03/30 02:11:12 Hervé Boutemy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 3 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317820&version=12354176&styleName=Text
>
> Staging r
here is my +1
Reproducible build ok: reference done with JDK 11 on *nix and umask 002
@Tamas this umask is the cause of your issue. In the future, with MSOURCES-137,
we will be insensitive, which will avoid this little annoying precision
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/03/30 01:55:10 Hervé Boutemy wr
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix with umask 022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/03/29 12:20:16 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Note: This is an eighth (alpha-4 and alpha-9 was scrubbed) preview release
> of Resolver 2.0.0, that would allow any downstream consumers
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 11 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/03/27 06:44:40 Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to release Apache Maven Invoker plugin version 3.6.1
> We solved 3 issues (well that's what Jira says):
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNo
https://github.com/apache/maven-source-plugin/pull/24 does not seem to get any
positive traction: be it
MSOURCE-140 and MSOURCE-141 are assigned to 3.3.1 release but nobody wants to
work with me on it to solve something: it seems they are not a real problem
I won't hold the 3.3.1 release foreve
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference done with JDK 21 on *nix and umask=022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/03/24 22:36:30 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 3 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922&version=12353577
>
> There are still a couple o
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference done with JDK 21 on *nix and umask=022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/03/23 22:06:12 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Note: this is a bugfix release for
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MGPG-113
>
> We solved 3 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/sec
I use purge-local-repository sometimes, for some very specific tests
like copy* and unpack* are useful tools in a few builds
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/03/21 18:43:24 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Oliver: all, really?
> I wonder what you used for goals like "purge-local-repository",
> "resolv
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix with umask 022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/03/15 08:25:07 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Note: this is a bugfix release for
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MGPG-112
>
> We solved 2 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/j
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix with umask 022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/03/15 07:58:49 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 6 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317220&version=12354406
>
> There are still a c
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference done with JDK 21 on *nix and umask 022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/03/15 07:36:15 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 10 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317225&version=12354079
>
> There are still a couple
using 4.x scheme looks simple and working: ok there is an exception with site,
as there are always exceptions
what is important is system prerequisites history: remember for JDK
requirement? same for Maven version requirement
just need to finish work on MPLUGIN-511 and we'll get the documentatio
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Win umask 022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/03/09 20:38:43 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 7 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317320&version=12354091
>
> There are still a couple of iss
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix umask 022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/03/08 09:42:15 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> We solved 13 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317521&version=12354382
>
> There are still a couple
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix umask 022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/03/07 18:27:47 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 25 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317220&version=12353243
>
> There are still a coup
Maven 4 is now stable enough: we need to try
Reproducible Builds is there to help check more aspects (if people check output)
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/03/06 08:45:55 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> I'm not sure if we should build release version with Maven 4
>
> sob., 2 mar 2024 o 10:48 Guillaume No
On 2024/03/03 08:56:59 Herve Boutemy wrote:
> +1
>
> Reproducible Builds near fully ok: reference builds done with Maven 4, JDK 21
> and umask 022 on *nix
>
> check command: mvn -Papache-release clean -Dgpg.skip verify artifact:compare
> -Dreference.repo=https://repositor
+1
Reproducible Builds near fully ok: reference builds done with Maven 4, JDK 21
and umask 022 on *nix
check command: mvn -Papache-release clean -Dgpg.skip verify artifact:compare
-Dreference.repo=https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging
only issue is with maven-remote-resour
+1
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/02/28 07:30:07 Benjamin Marwell wrote:
> Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members!
>
> After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to
> start a vote in favour of setting the minimal Java bytecode target
> of Maven-Core 4 to 17 and hence require J
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done on *nix with JDK 21 and umask 022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/01/29 19:37:20 Benjamin Marwell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 6 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12321432&version=12349496
>
> There are still two is
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows with umask
022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/01/07 19:33:04 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IMPORTANT: This require the following staging repositories:
>
> * Maven Doxia 2.0.0-M9
>
> we solved 1 issue:
> https://issues.apache.or
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows with umask
022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/01/07 12:18:56 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 10 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317820&version=12353824
>
> There are still a c
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows with umask
022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/01/06 20:05:47 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 7 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317927&version=12354100
>
> There are still a co
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows with umask
022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/01/06 20:22:46 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 12 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317230&version=12354052
>
> There are still a c
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done on *nix with JDK 21 and umask 022
see instructions to check RB yourself on a release:
https://maven.apache.org/developers/release/maven-project-release-procedure.html#call-the-vote
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/12/15 21:04:29 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done on *nix with JDK 11
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/11/27 02:12:14 Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to release the Apache Maven Build Cache Extension 1.1.0.
> We've fixed 8 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=1235247
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done on Widonws with JDK 8 and umask 022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/11/18 09:23:43 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 3 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317320&version=12353864
>
> There are still a coupl
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix with umask 022
checked with mvn -Papache-release,run-its clean -Dgpg.skip verify
artifact:compare
-Dreference.repo=https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/11/17 23:27:27 Tamás Cserven
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on WIndows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/11/17 21:54:18 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 3 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317821&version=12353875
>
> There are still a couple of issues le
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 17 on *nix with umask 022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/10/23 06:11:22 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 4 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317224&version=12353735
>
> There are still a c
maven-core/default-bindings.html
On 2023/10/21 14:34:32 Herve Boutemy wrote:
> +1
>
> Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix with umask
> 022 and Maven 4.0.0-alpha-8 itself (yes...)
>
> a few remarks:
> - I'll add some updates to release notes lat
I just published the reference documentation built with Maven 3.9.5
Maven 4.0.0-alpha-8 breaks something in Maven Site plugin on site descriptor
download from repository...
On 2023/10/21 08:34:31 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Looks like documentation site does not use parent site descrip
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix with umask 022
and Maven 4.0.0-alpha-8 itself (yes...)
a few remarks:
- I'll add some updates to release notes later
- during tests, I found that an active repository configured in my settings.xml
had been added to the published
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 11 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/10/20 18:44:06 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 9 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317927&version=12353730
>
> There are still a couple of issues
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows with umask
022
For people interested in details, I had to use JDK 8 Temurin but not Zulu to be
able to reproduce the CycloneDX SBOM (because of the supported hasing
algorithms difference between the 2 distributions)
Regards
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows with umask
022
For people interested in details, I had to use JDK 8 Temurin but not Zulu to be
able to reproduce the CycloneDX SBOM (because of the supported hasing
algorithms difference between the 2 distributions)
Regards
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows with umask
022
For people interested in details, I had to use JDK 8 Temurin but not Zulu to be
able to reproduce the CycloneDX SBOM (because of the supported hasing
algorithms difference between the 2 distributions)
Regards
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/10/15 07:54:25 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 6 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317820&version=12353337
>
> There are still a couple of issues le
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/10/13 22:18:52 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IMPORTANT: This require the following staging repositories:
>
> * Doxia 2.0.0-M8
> * Maven Reporting API 4.0.0-M8
> * Doxia Sitetools 2.0.0-M13
> * Maven
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/10/13 20:58:45 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IMPORTANT: This require the following staging repositories:
>
> * Doxia 2.0.0-M8
> * Maven Reporting API 4.0.0-M8
> * Doxia Sitetools 2.0.0-M13
> * Maven
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/10/13 20:39:58 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IMPORTANT: This require the following staging repositories:
>
> * Doxia 2.0.0-M8
> * Maven Reporting API 4.0.0-M8
> * Doxia Sitetools 2.0.0-M13
>
> we so
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/10/13 20:10:42 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 3 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317320&version=12353711
>
> There are still a couple of issues le
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/10/13 19:43:17 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IMPORTANT: This require the following staging repositories:
>
> * Doxia 2.0.0-M12
>
> we solved 2 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Release
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/10/13 19:32:40 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 2 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317230&version=12353657
>
> There are still a couple of issues le
1 - 100 of 320 matches
Mail list logo
