Re: How do I merge pull request on GitHub?

2015-05-29 Thread Stevo Slavić
--> Apache GitHub mirror --> svn.apache.org > > > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Stevo Slavić wrote: > > On Apache Mahout project we have nice docs on the workflow to merge or > > reject PRs submitted to github mirror. Maybe it works for you too. > > > > Kind

Re: How do I merge pull request on GitHub?

2015-05-29 Thread Stevo Slavić
On Apache Mahout project we have nice docs on the workflow to merge or reject PRs submitted to github mirror. Maybe it works for you too. Kind regards, Stevo Slavic. On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > Hi > > I'm going through the issue list in JIRA for maven-pmd-plugin an

Re: How do I merge pull request on GitHub?

2015-05-29 Thread Stevo Slavić
https://mahout.apache.org/developers/github.html On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Stevo Slavić wrote: > On Apache Mahout project we have nice docs on the workflow to merge or > reject PRs submitted to github mirror. Maybe it works for you too. > > Kind regards, > Stevo Slavic.

Re: [VOTE] ASF Parent POM Version 17

2015-04-27 Thread Stevo Slavić
+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 9:08 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 10 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311250&version=12329009 > > Staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheapache-1005 >

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.2.3 Release

2014-08-13 Thread Stevo Slavić
+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 2:19 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > +1 > > On 12 August 2014 07:19, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Time to release Maven 3.2.3! > > > > This release contains the important change of switching to HTTPS > transport by default! Please test this release wi

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

2013-09-12 Thread Stevo Slavić
+1 (non-binding) tested on Apache Mahout trunk Kind regards, Stevo Slavic. On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > On Sep 10, 2013, at 12:16 PM, sebb wrote: > > > On 10 September 2013 16:33, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >> > >> -1 > >> > >> The src.tar.gz and src.zip files have lost

Re: [VOTE] All new (non-patch) releases of Maven Core after 30th Sep 2013 to require Java 6+

2013-07-23 Thread Stevo Slavić
+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Stephen Connolly > wrote: > > This vote is to cover the minimum required version of Java for Maven > Core. > > > > Maven Plugins produced by the Apache Maven Project tha

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0

2013-07-10 Thread Stevo Slavić
+1 (non-binding) Apache Mahout builds OK with Apache Maven 3.1.0. Kind regards, Stevo Slavić. On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Anders Hammar wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Didn't try any of the new stuff explicitly though. > > /Anders > > > On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at

Re: Maven Upload Requests separate binaries and sources jar restriction

2010-10-22 Thread Stevo Slavić
gt; > > > On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:20 PM, Brian Fox wrote: > > > >> That's not used anymore, you want this: > >> > https://docs.sonatype.org/display/Repository/Uploading+3rd-party+Artifacts+to+Maven+Central > >> > >> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at

Re: [ANN] Maven Site Plugin 2.1 Released

2009-12-22 Thread Stevo Slavić
Could 2.0.11 be released that would support using maven-site-plugin 2.1? Otherwise there would be no java <1.5 compatible stable maven that could use maven-site-plugin 2.1+. Regards, Stevo. On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Lukas Theussl wrote: > There is no recommendation to use anything as far

Re: Maven 3.0-alpha-5 and maven-archetype packaging

2009-12-07 Thread Stevo Slavić
Thanks, fixed, build passes in both maven 2 and 3. Regards, Stevo. On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Stevo Slavić wrote: > > It seems 3.0-alpha-5 is not compatible with current 2.0-alpha-4 version of >> maven-archetype-plugin - archetype:create-fr

Maven 3.0-alpha-5 and maven-archetype packaging

2009-12-07 Thread Stevo Slavić
Hello Maven developers, It seems 3.0-alpha-5 is not compatible with current 2.0-alpha-4 version of maven-archetype-plugin - archetype:create-from-project mojo creates archetype project with packaging maven-archetype, but that packaging seems not to be supported by / valid for 3.0-alpha-5 (see this

Re: Release plugin documentation request

2009-11-28 Thread Stevo Slavić
Hello David, Maybe you can find answers to at least some of questions in following articles: - http://www.vineetmanohar.com/2009/10/23/how-to-automate-project-versioning-and-release-with-maven/ - http://weblogs.java.net/blog/2008/08/31/using-maven-release-plugin Regards, Stevo. On

Re: Site Update for Maven 3.0-alpha-3

2009-11-12 Thread Stevo Slavić
IMO 2.1.0 should stay as it is, if I'm not mistaken, most recent stable release of maven which is compatible with Java 1.4. When maven 2.2.1 is configured as default external maven installation m2eclipse 0.9.9 refuses to build projects (like maven core plugins) which still require Java 1.4. Maybe 2

Re: maven-archetype-2.0-alpha-5 tag

2009-11-12 Thread Stevo Slavić
ajor as IMO this issue prevents archetype-plugin from being fully adopted, especially in (closed source) corporate environments. Regards, Stevo. On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Brett Porter wrote: > Nice catch, I've removed it. > > On 12/11/2009, at 7:22 PM, Stevo Slavić

maven-archetype-2.0-alpha-5 tag

2009-11-12 Thread Stevo Slavić
Hello Maven developers, I'd like just to inform you that while checking out maven archetype I've noticed that there is a maven-archetype-2.0-alpha-5 tag created in April 2009; most recent release is 2.0-alpha-4 from September 2008, and current trunk is 2.0-alpha-5-SNAPSHOT, so this existing maven-

Re: [m2eclipse-user] Re: Maven, M2Eclipse, Nexus @ Eclipse DemoCamp in Budapest

2009-06-17 Thread Stevo Slavić
When in Szeged, why not come by to Novi Sad as well? :) Regards, Stevo. 2009/6/16 Tamás Cservenák > Also, two of us will be at University of Szeged on Friday 19th, doing > the same "we'll be doing some demos and chatting with folks". The beer > will came later, most probably at the evening. > >