Stefano Bagnara ha scritto:
Wendy Smoak ha scritto:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Petar Tahchiev
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
this is Petar Tahchiev from the Jakarta Cactus team. Our release
depends on
fixing the 345 issue of the Assembly plugin and releasing a new
version of
this
Wendy Smoak ha scritto:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Petar Tahchiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
this is Petar Tahchiev from the Jakarta Cactus team. Our release depends on
fixing the 345 issue of the Assembly plugin and releasing a new version of
this plugin. I have created several patches a
Jason van Zyl ha scritto:
On 3-Aug-08, at 9:05 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 04/08/2008, at 1:46 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Look at the analytics, zero traffic.
I didn't expect them to be high on traffic, but you should put them
somewhere else before dumping them outright.
They are not low, th
maybe you can consider
some improvement in the next pom models.
Stefano
Stefano Bagnara ha scritto:
Jukka Zitting ha scritto:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm simply saying that I agree with David that each package should
ha
Piotr Tabor ha scritto:
What is the status of the maven-grafo-plugin?
I found this:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Interactive+Dependency+Graphs
and this:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/sandbox/trunk/shared/grafo/grafo-maven-plugin/
They have been touched 15 months ago: is
What is the status of the maven-grafo-plugin?
I found this:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Interactive+Dependency+Graphs
and this:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/sandbox/trunk/shared/grafo/grafo-maven-plugin/
They have been touched 15 months ago: is this dead? moved elsewhere? A
I just noticed that during release/deployment we lose our site.xml
license header! (furthermore it changes the encoding, loose the declared
namespaces, and many other informations written in the site.xml)
I don't know what is the plugin that rewrites the site.xml (deploy ?
release ?) so I'm writin
Jason van Zyl ha scritto:
>
> If you are using the IDE integration how is it going to know where to
> find the sources and javadocs for debugging. That's one simple case.
> By adding a tweak to make the deployment diverge from the standard you
> potentially ruin the integration with other tooling.
Jason van Zyl ha scritto:
> I'm not sure this is something we want to encourage before the patches
> are applied. Keeping the sources and javadoc JARs together seems like
> a good thing to do. The sources and javadocs located in different
> locations doesn't seem to make much sense to me and there'
Is this similar to what m2clipse plugin already do when I run "Enable
Maven2 support" on my right click menu for my eclipse project and then
run "update sources" ?
Stefano
Syte Beimin ha scritto:
> First of all I hope this is the right place to send my patch to.
> At my company we're used to che
Jason van Zyl ha scritto:
> On 14 Jun 07, at 2:32 PM 14 Jun 07, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>>
>> I have some statistic of downloads for Apache JAMES Server (email
>> server).
>>
>> We distribute both binary and source distributions:
>> [...]
>
> Do you a
Jason van Zyl ha scritto:
>
> On 14 Jun 07, at 10:36 AM 14 Jun 07, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
>
>> I'm not talking about what our users do, I'm talking about what the
>> ASF policy seems to be
>>
>
> Ask five people and you'll get five different answers.
>
> Bottom line is who cares, I'll keep adapt
Jason van Zyl ha scritto:
>
> On 14 Jun 07, at 10:36 AM 14 Jun 07, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
>
>> I'm not talking about what our users do, I'm talking about what the
>> ASF policy seems to be
>>
>
> Ask five people and you'll get five different answers.
>
> Bottom line is who cares, I'll keep adapt
Jason van Zyl ha scritto:
>
> On 14 Jun 07, at 9:34 AM 14 Jun 07, Wendy Smoak wrote:
>
>> On 6/14/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Took me a few minutes so it doesn't hurt, I just exported the tag,
>>> zipped it up, signed, and checksummed it:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~
Jason van Zyl ha scritto:
>
> On 14 Jun 07, at 9:37 AM 14 Jun 07, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>
>> Wendy Smoak ha scritto:
>>> On 6/14/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Took me a few minutes so it doesn't hurt, I just exporte
Wendy Smoak ha scritto:
> On 6/14/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Took me a few minutes so it doesn't hurt, I just exported the tag,
>> zipped it up, signed, and checksummed it:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/maven-2.0.7/
>
> Thanks. Almost there... it needs LICENSE an
Jason van Zyl ha scritto:
>
> On 14 Jun 07, at 8:31 AM 14 Jun 07, Brian E. Fox wrote:
>
>> I'm no lawyer, but since the tag is publicly available from SVN, why
>> wouldn't that be sufficient? It would be convenient for some I suppose,
>> but I doubt it's a requirement.
>
> Took me a few minutes
Brian E. Fox ha scritto:
> I'm no lawyer, but since the tag is publicly available from SVN, why
> wouldn't that be sufficient? It would be convenient for some I suppose,
> but I doubt it's a requirement.
AFAIK if you don't release the source code in a package with LICENSE and
NOTICE file then no o
Emmanuel Venisse ha scritto:
> Team,
>
> What do we do for this issue? Do we move it to the next version or do
> you want to see it resolved in 2.0-beta-6?
My preference as *user* is to have 2.0-beta-6 out asap.
If I understood it correctly MRELEASE-128 is not a regression introduced
since 2.0-b
Jason van Zyl ha scritto:
> I started trying to reference artifact pages in the spec I've written up
> for the artifact resolution and I found it impossible to really find
> anything so I took John's initial outline for the taxonomy that makes up
> our subject matter and I made an attempt to align
> FYI, I added jar plugin config for manifest
> specification/implementation entries to the maven-parent pom for v6.
>
> Does anyone think it will cause problems? I know there were issues
> with multi-line descriptions, but I believe the jar plugin was fixed
> to use 'name' instead.
In Apache JA
Wendy Smoak ha scritto:
> Is the remote resources plugin also intended for assemblies?
>
> I have it configured to include license/notice in all the jars, but I
> also need to get the files into the top level of the Archiva and
> Continuum .tar.gz distributions.
>
> Any advice?
I've had the same
Hi all,
I'm a PMC member of the Apache JAMES project.
Few months ago we worked together with Cliff Schmidt on Legal/licensing
issues and our JAMES Server product and the result was that we had to
add this text in the bottom of our *LICENSE* file:
-
23 matches
Mail list logo
