-llr mvn option and see how it
> goes?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> 2013/8/9 Stanislav Ochotnicky
>
> > During rebuild of our Java packages for Fedora 20 we have encountered an
> > interesting issue with Maven 3.1.0[1]
> >
> > When pom.xml is referencing assemblie
3.0.5 works fine.
I couldn't see anything in the release notes that would suggest this change was
intentional, but before I file a bug maybe someone can correct me.
Attached is a simple reproducer prepared by Mikolaj Izdebski
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991454
--
Stan
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Olivier Lamy
> Talend: http://coders.talend.com
> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.o
ing
format-patch(es).
That said, the code should IMHO be split into repositories depending on
their releases (i.e. code that gets releases simultaneously should be in
one repo, code that has multiple parts which get their own release tags
should be in separate repos)
--
Stanislav Ochotnicky
Softw
consider dropping support for JRE
> 1.5 (given that 1.6 is nearing EOL) in which case we would probably retain
> a link to the last version that only requires JRE 1.5 such as we are
> currently doing for JRE 1.4 (i.e. the 2.0.11 link). Whether we would drop
> the 2.0.11 link at that point
re there any specific outstanding issues that need this change to solve?
Nothing specific, just looking 10 years into the future where Maven 2.x
still lives happily.
--
Stanislav Ochotnicky
Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno
PGP: 7B087241
Red Hat Inc.
*
there will come a time where 2.0.11 and 2.2.1 will have to die (i.e not
be featured as download options). I would guess the transition would
start at least then.
--
Stanislav Ochotnicky
Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno
PGP: 7B087241
Red Hat Inc. htt
maven-artifact-manager
* maven-error-diagnostics
* maven-model
* maven-monitor
* maven-plugin-descriptor
* maven-plugin-registry
* maven-profile
* maven-project
* maven-toolchain
--
Stanislav Ochotnicky
Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno
PGP: 7B087241
Red Ha
;
5. Send message
Most email clients allow you to add additional headers (at least
Thunderbird used to last time I checked), but for specifics you'll have
to look at docs for your client.
--
Stanislav Ochotnicky
Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno
PGP: 7B087241
Red Hat Inc.
://brettporter.wordpress.com/
>> http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter
>> http://twitter.com/brettporter
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>--
>Brett Porter
>br...@apache.org
>http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
>http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporte
cted. I don't want
>any specific modifications made to the existing build process to accommodate
>RPMs. I think a separate build would be more useful as it will be specific to
>the task at hand and people can use it as they like to produce RPMs for
>themselves if they so choo
o if there's no easy way to upgrade. That is why
>I would think that the Maven folks would be interested in this, but it
>sounds like it's not a priority.
>
>Thanks for your response, Manfred, and for everyone else's input in this
>thread.
I like your approach. Ku
Quoting Jos Backus (2012-03-16 19:55:31)
>Hi Stanislav,
>
>On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky
> wrote:
>> Quoting Jos Backus (2012-03-15 21:04:00)
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>I'm trying to install Maven 3 in automatically generated CentOS VM
&
t;from scratch" and therefore BuildRequires tag is
pointless in them.
I assume you have a specific use-case, but it doesn't seem valid from
the information you provided. Why do you want to rebuild the rpm after
the maven-rpm-plugin is done with it?
--
Stanislav Ochotnicky
Software
e. Biggest issue would probably be that
some of our current binary rpms in F17 and rawhide are built using
OpenJDK 7 with target set to 1.7 so you won't be able to use them with
1.6 VM.
We do have 3.0.4 currently and quite a few plugins, but if you go this
way I'd suggest to ask questi
lnerability? You bundled just the binary right?
3. Develop fix for each of identified versions
4. test, deploy, etc
END LOOP
Good luck to your security response team.
Before I forget: Merry Christmas and happy New Year everyone (no
sarcasm here :-) )
--
Stanislav Ochotnicky
Software Engi
about updated deps one
way or the other, but it would be nice to have it stated in the
release notes if possible.
So: pretty please do this :-)
--
Stanislav Ochotnicky
Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno
PGP: 7B087241
Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
maven.test.skip" string, referencing
> "test" scope directly and few other ugly things so I know it can't be
> included as it is. I'd be willing to work on it more, but first I'd like
> your opinion on the general PoC idea so I don't waste time with some
d as it is. I'd be willing to work on it more, but first I'd like
your opinion on the general PoC idea so I don't waste time with something
you'd consider pointless in the end :-)
Regards,
--
Stanislav Ochotnicky
Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno
PGP: 7B08724
Hi,
ReactorReader used ArtifactUtils in some places, but in others created
keys/versionless keys on its own. This inconsistency could cause
problems in the future. Attached patch fixes this problem.
--
Stanislav Ochotnicky
Associate Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno
PGP
org/objectweb/asm/*Writer*
--
Stanislav Ochotnicky
Associate Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno
PGP: 71A1677C
Red Hat Inc. http:
org/objectweb/asm/*Writer*
----
--
Stanislav Ochotnicky
Associate Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno
PGP: 71A1677C
Red Hat Inc. http:
22 matches
Mail list logo
