files? All the output I get from svn diff
seems to do the same as the patch I provided to you yesterday.
Ryan
On 5/22/07, Ryan Daum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just want to point out one more thing, and that is that the class
TagScmResult has two constructors, one of which accepts the l
During further use/testing of the mercurial provider (maven-scm-provider-hg)
I discovered that the "tag" command was missing. I've just fixed this.
Please see the patch attached to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-319
Thank you,
Ryan Daum
--
Ryan Daum
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
S
ttp://people.apache.org/~evenisse/stage/repo/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eevenisse/stage/repo/>
>
> Tag:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/scm/tags/maven-scm-1.0-rc1/
>
> So, let's try 72h +1/+0/-1. Please cast your votes!
>
> Here my +1
>
> Emmanuel
>
>
--
Ryan Daum
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Developer, Toronto
647.724.5232 x 2073
Question: for non-empty directories, does the test assume that the directory
itself shows up as an addition? Or just the files in it?
Ryan
On 4/12/07, Ryan Daum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/12/07, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If it ignore the ad
't a better place for the "isAllowEmptyDirectoryAdd" be on the
AbstractScmProvider?
Ryan
But we can add a "isAllowToAddEmptyDirectory()" method in the AddCommand and
use it in ScmTestCase
Emmanuel
Ryan Daum a écrit :
> Many revision control systems (Mercurial i
ial side effects here.
Is it really the intention of maven-scm to enforce this behaviour, or can we
have a per-SCM-provider configuration which declares whether to test this
behaviour?
Thanks, Ryan
--
Ryan Daum
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Developer, Toronto
647.724.5232 x 2073
out as part of?
Ryan
On 4/4/07, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
et tested of course ;)
Emmanuel
Emmanuel Venisse a écrit :
> They need to be updated with latest code of maven-scm-api.
>
> Emmanuel
>
> Ryan Daum a écrit :
>> What is the procedure
