Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.1.0-RC3

RC3 (https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-5078cd01de9bd9/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/2.1.0-RC3/) Looks good on my corporate builds. No problem here with this version. Two complicated projects (50+ subprojects) works great. Regards, P

Re: maven-grafo-plugin status

happens that many people use the two together... which IMHO is wrong but people need to decide for them selves On Fri, 06 Jun 2008 02:46:55 Piotr Tabor wrote: Hi Stefano, The message really looks very ugly, but it means that the graph plugin does not support aggregated projects (parents pom

Re: maven-grafo-plugin status

Hi Stefano, The message really looks very ugly, but it means that the graph plugin does not support aggregated projects (parents pom) yet. Try to do find the project pom (packaging: jar,war,ear) that depends on everything else and than call the same operation within the directory. Currently t

Re: maven-grafo-plugin status

x27;t time to work on it for last 8 months, but I'm still willing to. I will appreciate your feedback. Thanks, Piotr Tabor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [vote] release maven war plugin 2.1-alpha-1

Tested it in some projects. +1 [not-binding] Thank you, Piotr Stephane Nicoll pisze: > Hi, > > I'd like to release maven war plugin 2.1-alpha-1. This version brings > a complete refactoring of the packaging as well as the overlay > mechanism. One can now specify the order in which overlays are a

svn commit: r578582 - in /maven/components/trunk/maven-core/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/ main/resources/META-INF/plexus/ test/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/)

ms. I am out of ideas what to do to reproduce it. Thank you, Piotr Tabor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ITs

fix for MNG-1323, breaks trunk horribly when everything >> is clean. I ran the ITs after Piotr did but doing so with everything >> clean doesn't work. Time for Hudson. > I am really sorry for those above. I will take a look into this during t

Re: EJB-client optional in war produces different result

>> this later if no one knows off hand.) >> >> I think that you are talking about this issue: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2871 It was applied to trunk (2.1-SNAPSHOT). I hope it will be applied to (2.0.x). Thank you, Piotr Tabor --

Re: MNG-2871 - internal dependencies and phases below "package"

or trying to copy a jar. In the package phase, the artifact is > resolved to the jar in the target folder. In >install, the artifact has > the file in the local repo. > > --Brian > > -Original Message- > From: Piotr Tabor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wedn

MNG-2871 - internal dependencies and phases below "package"

uot; after upgrading version's number... So it leads to "mvn release:prepare" failure in case of ejb-client dependencies. Thank you, Piotr Tabor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [MNG-3043] Allow 'mvn test' to work with test-jar dependencies in a reactor

Hi Jamie, Please, look at this issue: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAR-75 (Jason - please, look at this issue / patch) I think that If it is applied and you do the tests after "package" phase (run mvn package to fire the tests), the test's will use the "new"

Re: MNG-1323 - discussion about available fixes

I prepare more statistics: I tested the problem on two projects: * it0124 (from MNG-1323) ( 3 artifacts) * medium_real_project(40 artifacts) The current version on maven (2.0.8-SNAPSHOT) with "-X -o": it0124 : 9 seconds; 8 seconds; 9 seconds (all didn't finish because of the MNG

Re: MNG-1323 - discussion about available fixes

I prepare more statistics: I tested the problem on two projects: * it0124 (from MNG-1323) ( 3 artifacts) * medium_real_project(40 artifacts) The current version on maven (2.0.8-SNAPSHOT) with "-X -o": it0124 : 9 seconds; 8 seconds; 9 seconds (all didn't finish because of the MNG

Re: MNG-1323 - discussion about available fixes

hm? >> >> -john >> >> >> On Jul 12, 2007, at 11:29 AM, Piotr Tabor wrote: >> >> > John Casey pisze: >> >> While #3 might have the best performance in terms of speed, I really >> >> wonder about memory performance. Leaving all those o

Re: MNG-1323 - discussion about available fixes

John Casey pisze: > While #3 might have the best performance in terms of speed, I really > wonder about memory performance. Leaving all those old antrun plugin > instances laying around but still reachable means that in very large > projects that use antrun, we'll have some pretty significant memor

MNG-1323 - discussion about available fixes

ut I'm sure it is to be worked out) Am I right? Please comment... At least to motivate me to work on this issue further. Thanks, Piotr Tabor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Maven Diagram Maker

Peter Kolbus wrote > First: My experience so far has been that Prefuse can create simple > shapes (boxes, ellipses, etc) and does an excellent job with those in > forced ("spring-loaded") layouts, but won't be appropriate for shapes as > complex as UML classes and components, since Prefuse shapes a

Re: Maven Diagram Maker

Ralph Goers pisze: > Piotr Tabor wrote: >> Done: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Maven+Diagram+Maker > I'm not sure that Jimi's license is acceptable according to > http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html. You would need to get > verification tha

Re: Maven Diagram Maker

D]> wrote: >> >> On 5/11/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > On 11 May 07, at 2:08 PM 11 May 07, Barrie Treloar wrote: >> > >> > > On 5/11/07, Piotr Tabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> I would like to pro

Re: Maven Diagram Maker

Done: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Maven+Diagram+Maker Piotr Tabor Jason van Zyl pisze: > I still think a summary in the wiki is the best place to start. This > will get lost amidst the noise. > > > On 11 May 07, at 4:22 AM 11 May 07, Piotr Tabor wrote: > >

Maven Diagram Maker

ferent in implementation, so they will force me to develop and create a truly universal framework. Thanks, Piotr Tabor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: M206 Regression: Build is broken

Piotr Tabor napisał(a): > David J. M. Karlsen napisał(a): > >> Hi - I expirience the same - but only when running a multiproject: >> >> parent >> -ejb-project (generating ejb and ejb-client) >> -client-project (using ejb-client) >> >> If

Re: M206 Regression: Build is broken

k on the issue - by I need the opinion if there exists more general solution then my workaround. Thanks, Piotr Tabor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: M206 Regression: Build is broken

Hello, It can be connected with the bug: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2871 (it's old bug - since at least 2.0.4). I will try to repeat it/look at it today evening. Piotr Tabor Jörg Schaible napisał(a): Hi Jason, thank for your comment, where do I find the staged version? I&#

Re: New developer proposition

Jason van Zyl napisał(a): On 13 Mar 07, at 4:10 AM 13 Mar 07, Piotr Tabor wrote: Hello, I would like to join the Maven team and help you fixing bugs in the project. Lots of people submit patches. Generally if you have shown a sustained effort over a period of time one of us will

New developer proposition

sks and bugs to correct. I wish fixing them will teach me the Maven sourcecode construction. I'm a student of Warsaw University and my CV is here: http://students.mimuw.edu.pl/~pt214569/Tabor_Piotr-CV-eng.pdf Thanks, Piotr Tabor