+1
I agree. Furthermore, I'd like to see the maven-plugin Jira issues also
move to this new list.
Pete
On Wed, 2004-05-12 at 12:50, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As activity is growing amongst the plugins I think it would be wise to
> setup a separate plugin mailing list. The mail regarding m
+1
The AspectJ plugin was long overdue for a rewrite.
On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 13:32, Vincent Massol wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following my post on the subject of "Is it possible to accept a new
> committer for a specific plugin?", I'd like to propose Carlos as a
> maven-plugins committer. Carlos has provi
+1
On Mon, 2004-05-10 at 19:57, Brett Porter wrote:
> Note that this vote has dependencies on these votes:
> - Release of maven-jelly-tags 1.0
> - Release of all maven plugins
> And is conditional on the successful rsolution of MAVEN-1275 which I will
> test after checking the patch and before sta
+1
On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 10:53, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> As part of work on the maven2 component Trygve has been super helpful
> and pretty much knows the components inside and out now including being
> able to change the master model and regenerate everything for use in the
> other comp
Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would like to nominate Brett, Michal and Vincent for the Maven PMC
+1, +1, and +1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Emmanuel Venisse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For respect name convention for goal in plugins, I think we do cut java
> plugin to java, jar and clean plugins.
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comm
