+1
On 4/15/07, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
As Mike Perham pointed out the Clover license for the release clover
plugin (ie v2.3) has expired. Thus the urgency to release version 2.4.
Here's the release notes for 2.4:
** Bug
* [MCLOVER-45] - Excluded file
What is the point of this? It doesn't seem to add much value from my POV.
-- Forwarded message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Apr 5, 2007 9:44 PM
Subject: [jira] Subscription: Design & Best Practices
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Issue Subscription
Filter: Desi
I'm not aware of any. If it's not here, it doesn't exist.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/
On 4/3/07, Tim Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can anyone tell me what the state of PVCS integration is.
I recall some discussions a while ago that a provider for PVCS
I don't think this applies to Perforce but thanks for keeping me in the loop.
mike
On 3/21/07, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mike,
I don't know if Perforce checkout files in the current directory or in a subdirectory for
a "view", but if it's in a subdirectory like clearcase, it
+1
On 3/20/07, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any chance of getting another PMC member to look at this and vote on it.
Also on the maven-remote-resources-plugin vote as well. Both only have
2 binding PMC votes.
-
T
The key question to me is: are existing 2.0.5 builds going to be
better or worse after this upgrade? I would prefer to see less
speculation and more bits. Put out a Maven 2.0.6 snapshot that people
can try with their project and get reports from the people in this
thread. If no one has problems
+1
On 3/16/07, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
As Mike Perham pointed out the Clover license for the release clover
plugin (ie v2.3) has expired. Thus the urgency to release version 2.4.
Here's the release notes for 2.4:
** Bug
* [MCLOVER-45] - Excluded file
+1 (of course!)
On 3/16/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Patrick has, for at least a couple months, been working on MNG-1577,
has written extensive tests, changed and altered patches for anything
and everything that's been asked of him. He worked with Mike and
Ralph discussing t
A will get D 2.0. Yes, our build depends heavily on this behavior.
I'm ok with it going into 2.0.6 as long as it is noted in the release
notes. Based on the number of votes the issue has, this is a major
problem for a lot of people. I can't imagine any reasonably sized
build which has not enco
+1
On 3/15/07, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to release version 2.2 of the PMD plugin. It's been over 8
months since the last release and this is a fairly significant
improvement addressing 14 JIRA items.
---
Personally I believe a release is needed ASAP. Users should not use
SNAPSHOTs and no releases work anymore.
On 3/15/07, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Mike,
Clover plugin 2.4-SNAPSHOT has a license valid till 30th of January
2008.
Maybe this warrants a release of the plugin?
I'm not sure how much I can do in the next two weeks as we are
finishing a release and I'm on vacation the last week of March. I
will discuss with Patrick tomorrow whether he can provide some help in
brainstorming the best solution to the issue and setting up Continuum
here locally for testing pu
The license for the clover plugin expired some time ago. Is an update
in the works?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I believe the patch is very very similar for the branch but the
sandbox code was for the trunk code as of a few weeks ago. Patrick is
out on vacation this week and back on Monday. I know we found two
bugs in the patch while using it internally over the last month that
are not fixed in the sandbo
I was hoping I wouldn't have to "remind" you with a baseball bat this time. :-)
We've found two issues with our patch in the two weeks we've been
using Maven with it applied locally. We'll have an updated sandbox
for you to review shortly.
mike
On 2/15/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
No. 2.0.5 is expected in the near future.
On 1/22/07, edovale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there any plan to release maven 2.1 in the near future?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
+1
Tested against our build and appears to work identically to 2.0.4.
On 1/12/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
The entire release is staged here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/maven-2.0.5/
The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here:
http://people.apache
John, can you give us a sample of what the final report looks like?
On 1/11/07, John Tolentino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Everyone,
You can now generate release reports using the maven-swizzle-plugin.
Here's the related documentation:
http://people.apache.org/~jtolentino/staging_site/maven-
+1
I'm all for more frequent releases. I believe the 2.0.5 snapshot
works ok with our build. Ship it!
On 1/10/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I want to call a vote for 2.0.5. All the issues that are going to get
done are done. We'll release and move on.
I would like to star
, they generate the report using data from
the reactor projects.
AFAIK parent projects are executed _after_ the modules anyway. So this comes
down to report plugins supporting aggregation themselves, right?
Mike Perham wrote:
> There's a case (aggregating reports) where it would be useful
There's a case (aggregating reports) where it would be useful to have
a parent project's site generate AFTER the children's site is
generated. Would it be possible and/or easy to add an report
lifecycle event which is called on the parent reports after the
children are processed?
mike
-
+1
On 1/4/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Vote to operate as
- requiring 2/3rds of the PMC to vote (13), with a majority within
those votes for it to pass (ie, add them all and if the result is >
0). Other votes would be welcome with reasons as advisory, but not
binding.
- Votes
changes.xml is also very useful where module:JIRA project is not 1:1.
We have jira projects for each subsystem, not module.
On 12/27/06, Jeff Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I like the changes page as a "simplified, user-friendly" list of notable changes
made for each release. The defect/RFE
We use the changes plugin but only the changes.xml report generator.
+1 on your changes.
On 12/26/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Is anyone actually using this because I'd like to sync this up with
the reporting we're doing for voting. The JIRA stuff in the changes
plugin is n
To be fair to Graham, I think it would be reasonable to go to the
mailing list and say "There hasn't been an httpd release in 6 months.
Would you guys consider releasing it sometime soon?" I assume that's
the intent of his original message.
mike
On 12/11/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
I verified the release plugin and a few scm plugin operations worked
by hand for the Perforce provider. I would like to hear confirmation
from others if they have time to compile the source and test it out
with Continuum, etc.
On 12/5/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Make sure we sy
+1
On 12/5/06, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
I'd like to release 1.0-beta-4.
We have 41 issues fixed in it since April 2006, and lot of them fix some pb in
plugins that use Maven-SCM (release, changelog plugins and continuum)
+1 from me.
This is a long standing and popular issue in JIRA.
On 12/3/06, Ole Ersoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
If I override a dependency
in a child pom, and then
run
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comma
If you don't use the Perforce SCM provider, you can delete this email now. :-)
I've updated the Perforce SCM provider to provide auto-correction of
invalid depot locations. This happens frequently in two scenarios:
1) you branch a module but forget to update the SCM URL from the trunk
location
There's one fix I need to get into the Perforce provider before it
goes into a new release plugin. I'll commit to getting it done this
weekend if you'll hold off on building the beta-4 snapshot.
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-229
mike
On 11/30/06, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
Slow and deterministic always wins over (slightly) faster and
non-deterministic IMO. A sort is negligible compared the acrobatics
PMD performs so I say go ahead and add it.
On 11/6/06, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Personally, I prefer the sort. I hate reports and such that would be
+1
But I would prefer to see an upgrade to PMD 3.8 before release.
On 11/5/06, Joakim Erdfelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
It has been 3 months since the last release of the maven-pmd-plugin,
Since then, there has been a refactoring of the excludes logic to bring
harmony to the pmd and cpd
MNG-2340 and MNG-1577 are both on my must fix list before release. I
still need to test the latest patch for 1577.
mike
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
I think we should nominate him for sainthood too. :-)
On 10/19/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Over the last month Dan has been helping a great deal with the Maven
bootstrap and integration testing which are not for the faint of
heart. He's been great at communicating solu
+1
There's a lot of good fixes in there.
On 10/4/06, Vincent Siveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
The latest Javadoc plugin release was in may.
I think that it is still in good shape. We solved 18 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11138&styleName=Html&versio
he conflict resolution
strategies to make this configurable in Maven 2.1.
- Brett
On 19/09/2006, at 12:58 AM, Mike Perham wrote:
> We constantly have version selection problems where Maven's random
> version selection bites us. This would almost always be solved if
> Maven would sel
We constantly have version selection problems where Maven's random
version selection bites us. This would almost always be solved if
Maven would select the greater of the two versions. Why doesn't Maven
do this instead of picking randomly?
---
Xdoclet plugin is subclassing a class in the Antrun plugin. This
antrun class has an injected property that works when used as part of
an antrun execution but is null when xdoclet plugin is executed.
Should this work?
public abstract class AbstractAntMojo
extends AbstractMojo
{
/**
*
t; wrote:
On 8 Sep 06, at 11:29 AM 8 Sep 06, Mike Perham wrote:
> We are walled off from the public repo in order to control our
> dependencies very closely. Until recently, if I found that we needed
> a new package, I would just suck down the contents by using wget:
>
>
We are walled off from the public repo in order to control our
dependencies very closely. Until recently, if I found that we needed
a new package, I would just suck down the contents by using wget:
wget -nd -l 1 -r
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons-attributes/commons-attributes-api/2.2/
The
+1
Anything is better than what is currently out there in the wild.
On 9/6/06, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello
The changes plugin has not had a release since it was moved here from
the Mojo project. Since then 49 issues has been closed:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNa
You might try this instead of ibiblio:
https://maven-repository.dev.java.net/nonav/
On 8/23/06, Joerg Hohwiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
what is the actual state about javax JARs at ibiblio?
I have seen that javax.mail is available as
Continuum needs to check out your source to its working directory. It
does this by creating a clientspec.
mike
Prashanth Krishnamurthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/22/2006 05:09:48
PM:
> Hi,
>
> Why does continuum create a perforce client specs when
> it does a build ? ( ex :
> Admin
The LSU mirror is missing commons-collections 3.2. I'm worried that there
are other missing parts or it has not sync'd in the 2 months since 3.2 was
added to the repo. Is there any contact info for them or can someone
forward this note to them?
http://ibiblio.lsu.edu/main/pub/packages/maven
http://downloads.planetmirror.com/pub/maven2 does not seem to work. It
returns an HTML response for everything. I got the URL here:
http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-mirror-settings.html
mike
+1!
"Stephane Nicoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/22/2006 08:35:35
AM:
> +1
>
> Stéphane
>
> On 8/22/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > There are 39 issues that have been resolved since the last release of
> > the JAR plugin:
> >
> > http://jira.codehaus.org/sec
Welcome aboard!
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/22/2006 07:08:14 AM:
> Hi all,
>
> The Maven PMC has voted to add Dennis Lundberg to the PMC. Please
> join me in welcoming him!
Unfortunately my area is not the OWL-part of our system, but I sit right
next to the guys that do use it. :-) We have been using Jena but are
replacing it with our own impl to minimize large external dependencies. I
would suggest you take a look at it; it has worked ok for us for the last
y
Sorry, we use a ton of OWL here and so I'm used to using it as a synonym
for RDF.
http://www.w3schools.com/rdf/rdf_owl.asp
mike
"Hilco Wijbenga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/16/2006 03:55:09
PM:
>
> > Just as a compiled binary is a "binary snapshot" of
> > the code at a point in time, we
Good point, John. Hilco, your proposal sounds good in the context of a
single VM invocation when everything is in-memory. How does this extend to
reporting over time? Just as a compiled binary is a "binary snapshot" of
the code at a point in time, we need to take a "report snapshot" with al
I'm fine with Archiva instead of Curator too.
Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/14/2006 09:47:29 AM:
> Brett,
>
> I change my vote. I vote now for Archiva
>
> Emmanuel
>
> Brett Porter a écrit :
> > We currently have:
> >
> > Curator: 13
> > Librarian: 2
> > Archiva: 7
> >
> >
+1
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/09/2006 11:18:38 PM:
> Hi,
>
> Currently, v2 of the parent does not have the correct paths to upload
> to, but v3 includes the CPD check which is breaking at least the Maven
> build and the IDEA plugin.
>
> I would like to propose that we releas
FYI I didn't even know this mailing list existed until this thread.
Subscription requested... So my guess is there are other committers in the
same boat as me.
mike
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/09/2006 11:43:03 PM:
> So... not much response on this.
>
> We separated notifica
Curator +1, sounds good to me.
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/09/2006 06:57:25 PM:
> Please vote for one of the following names:
>
> [ ] Archiva
> [ ] Curator
> [ ] Librarian
> [ ] Nexus
> [ ] Repository Manager (ie, don't change it)
>
> I'm going to add the following votes for
You're in like Flynn, Den.
mike
Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/08/2006 03:15:54 PM:
>
> I don't have permission to change that file. It would be great if
> someone could help me get this added. Here's my developer element:
>
>
>
>dennisl
>Dennis Lundber
I would think you should be added as a committer to pom/maven/pom.xml. If
you don't have permission to change that file, send me the
snippet and I'll add you.
mike
+1
Great to have another committer familiar with Perforce.
-Original Message-
From: John Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 7:54 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [vote] Jeff Jensen as Maven Plugins committer
+1
On 7/30/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECT
Can someone look at this? I've debugged the problem - see the issue -
but I have no idea what the fix is.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Perham (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 2:08 PM
To: issues@maven.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Updated: (MASSEMB
Agreed. This would be very cool to see integrated.
-Original Message-
From: David J. M. Karlsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 9:14 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Developed a RAD6 extention of maven-eclipse-plugin
Cool - this should probably be merged
What does it do above and beyond the normal eclipse plugin? I ask
because we are using RAD here and it works fine with the normal plugin.
-Original Message-
From: Richard van Nieuwenhoven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 8:13 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Dev
svn diff to create diffs + TortoiseSVN to apply patches
-Original Message-
From: Barrie Treloar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 6:35 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: What patch program do people use on Windows XP?
I've done some work at home (on a Windows XP
Dennis, I just added an issue I would like to see fixed before
promotion.
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHANGES-50
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Lundberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 12:52 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [vote] Promote maven-changelo
http://maven.apache.org/plugins links to dependency but that site does
not exist.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please use the Maven users list for user questions.
-Original Message-
From: Maiskar, Vikram V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 7:42 AM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Using maven 2.0
Hi,
I need to write maven scripts with 2.x version, such that I can do all :
co
If only there was some sort of service which allowed you to "search" the
"Internet" for web pages associated with a unique term.
;-)
-Original Message-
From: Milos Kleint [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 2:10 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release
Shouldn't it be 1.0-alpha-1 or beta if you are just throwing it out
there to get feedback?
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 8:39 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Release DOAP 1.0 plugin
Hi,
I whipped up a small D
+1
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 4:11 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [vote] Dennis Lundberg as a Maven Committer
Hi,
I'd like to propose Dennis Lundberg as a Maven committer. It's already a
committer on maven pl
Please use the maven user list for user questions in the future.
I'm not sure but I don't believe jar-plugin 2.0 allows this. jar-plugin
2.1 should and I just posted a note asking for a release if possible. I
would question why the software is failing on unknown manifest entries.
It really shou
What's holding up jar plugin 2.1? There's a huge number of
fixes/improvements and the documentation is light-years better.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To test MNG-1245 you can just replace your maven-project-2.0.4.jar in
MAVEN_HOME/lib with the SNAPSHOT I attached to the issue and see if the issue
goes away or changes.
-Original Message-
From: Jörg Schaible [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 8:07 AM
To: Maven Dev
Done.
-Original Message-
From: Maria Odea Ching [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 8:17 PM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Review Javadoc Plugin Documentation
Hi Everyone,
I've made some changes in the javadoc plugin. Could someone please
review it? :)
--
Done, with small changes.
-Original Message-
From: Allan Ramirez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 10:31 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Review of install plugin
Hi everyone,
Just updated the docs of the install plugin. I hope you dont mind if you
take a look
src/site/apt/example/
like-this.apt
likeThis.apt
likethis.apt
I know it's anal but can a benevolent dictator just declare one as the
standard? I prefer to former but don't care one way or the other.
javadoc and install currently have all three represented. :-)
-
I would like to see plugins be made a little more independent from
Maven. You know how J2EE code is difficult to test due to the need for
a container? Well, Maven is the container for plugins and that need for
a container makes it more difficult than necessary to test and reuse
plugins. There's
I think Maven 2.1 needs to differentiate between the original project
sources and "currently effective" generated sources. Report plugins act
on the former, build plugins on the latter. I don't know that it is
possible to solve this problem in 2.0.x.
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Mass
Please correct me if I'm misunderstanding something (since it's been months
since I looked at clover) but isn't the heart of the problem that you add the
clover source to the project sources? I don't think you should do this. It's
not technically part of the project source and source reports s
eed 3 binding +1 votes ?
Mvgr,
Martin
Mike Perham wrote:
> Binding +1: Mike, Brett
> Non-Binding +1: Fabrice
>
> I will release it today and update the site docs.
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Mike Perham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July
Binding +1: Mike, Brett
Non-Binding +1: Fabrice
I will release it today and update the site docs.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Perham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 2:31 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [vote] release maven-pmd-plugin 2.1
I think PMD is
stalled to get the latest site), or roll back to 1 if there is a
problem with the circular dependencies.
- Brett
On 7/07/2006 5:30 AM, Mike Perham wrote:
> I think PMD is in good shape. We've upgraded to PMD 3.7, added a
bunch
> of tests and upgraded the documentation. Can someone tell m
I guess I ham-fisted it cause it worked when I tried it just now. Maybe
maven took a smoke break and installed the jar a few minutes later. :-)
-Original Message-
From: jerome lacoste [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 11:11 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: ru
me lacoste [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 9:37 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: running docck
On 7/7/06, Mike Perham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can someone update this page with instructions on how to run docck on
a
> plugin?
>
> http://docs.codehaus.o
Can someone update this page with instructions on how to run docck on a
plugin?
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Maven+Plugin+Documentation
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
I think PMD is in good shape. We've upgraded to PMD 3.7, added a bunch
of tests and upgraded the documentation. Can someone tell me how to run
the docck checker so I can verify the docs before publishing the site?
The RC snapshot binary is maven-pmd-plugin-2.1-20060706.192528-1.jar.
Roadmap wit
Looks like Brett committed draft 2 of the doc update in MWAR-48 and someone
published the site, bugs and all. So the war site documentation needs to be
polished and published ASAP. You can read through the patches attached to that
issue and see if they provide the info you need.
-Original
The more I think about it, the more I agree with this. I believe we
will need to start using this -n versioning for POM fixes. It's easy to
develop and test a java module but screw up the POM and make it unusable
to the public. How long and how many revisions did it take for us to
get hibernate
Would someone mind updating me to PMC member in the root Maven POM at
pom/maven/pom.xml or give me permission to do it myself?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Kenney Westerhof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, July 01, 2006 2:59 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: [RANT] This Maven thing is killing us
>
>
> > Perhaps we can have a rule that every dependency MUST have
> a declared
> > and
"I'll spare you the details on that one"
This does nothing to solve the problem. We can't fix what we don't know
about.
The quality of the repository metadata has always struck me as something
that will make or break the long-term success of Maven. We can only
document it as best as possible -
I assume it handles @since on both goals and individual parameters
within a goal?
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 11:05 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: [vote] apply MNG-2406 (r417931) to maven-2.0.x branch
>
>
gt; developer... maybe someone here knows of a similar page meant
> for a user?
>
>
> Mike Perham wrote:
> > For required parameters, it would be nice to know what the
> default value
> > is right there at the top instead of having to navigate down to the
> > details.
For required parameters, it would be nice to know what the default value
is right there at the top instead of having to navigate down to the
details. Also as a new user, I would think it would be unclear how
"expression" maps to the default value. A cheat sheet or glossary might
be nice at the bo
I fixed everything I felt comfortable changing. There's a few more
issues with patches and it needs doc work and unit tests. I can do the
former but I still haven't figured out the plugin test stuff yet.
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday,
I can continue to work with Jochen.
Jochen, if you want to go through JIRA and send me pointers to issues
you think are ready, please do. I'll have a few hours to spend on this
tomorrow night.
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2
I would think the main thing to consider is whether those docs reflect
the latest release. Documenting features which have not been released
yet is a no-no.
> -Original Message-
> From: Dennis Lundberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2006 5:37 PM
> To: Maven Develope
+1 Sounds reasonable.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Carlos Sanchez
> Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 3:42 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: [VOTE] Release maven-project-info-reports-plugin 2.0.1
>
> I'd like to release the
all in the same version (at least for
> now) so it's more easy to update them in
> projects that use them.
>
> Emmanuel
>
> Mike Perham a écrit :
> > Can you summarize why? Do they all have outstanding fixes
> deserving of
> > a release? Or are you just
Can you summarize why? Do they all have outstanding fixes deserving of
a release? Or are you just keeping them all versioned with the same
version (1.0-beta-1)?
> -Original Message-
> From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 9:22 AM
> To: Maven D
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2006 7:07 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: [vote] move maven-archiver from components to shared
>
> I propose that we move v2.1 of maven-archiver to the /shared/
> area of SVN. I th
> indents) rather than pushing the original message down? It would
certainly make interleaving replies easier.
-Original Message-
From: Kenney Westerhof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2006 1:27 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Commit MJAR-38
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006
This is a patch against 2.0.x maven-archiver which allows the user to
override the default manifest entries placed by Maven and also cleans
all manifest entries of linebreaks so invalid manifests with linebreaks
are not created. We will also need to push this down to the jar plugin
but do we want
1 - 100 of 438 matches
Mail list logo
